[ceph-users] Re: Ceph Squid released?

On 4/29/24 08:50, Alwin Antreich wrote: well it says it in the article. The upcoming Squid release serves as a testament to how the Ceph project continues to deliver innovative features to users without compromising on quality. I believe it is more a statement of having new memb

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph Squid released?

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 09:06, Robert Sander wrote: > On 4/29/24 08:50, Alwin Antreich wrote: > > > well it says it in the article. > > > > The upcoming Squid release serves as a testament to how the Ceph > > project continues to deliver innovative features to users without > > comprom

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph Squid released?

On 4/29/24 09:36, Alwin Antreich wrote: Who knows. I don't see any packages on download.ceph.com for Squid. Ubuntu has them: https://packages.ubuntu.com/noble/ceph Regards -- Robert Sander Heinlein Consulting GmbH Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin https://www.heinl

[ceph-users] Re: [EXTERN] cache pressure?

there might be situations/dicrectories for which it makes a lot of sense that they are watched for changes and vscode is informed about these. So excluding the entire cephfs might not always be a good idea. But I guess you need to find out. Dietmar On 4/27/24 16:38, Erich Weiler wrote: Actua

[ceph-users] Re: Impact of large PG splits

The split process completed over the weekend, the balancer did a great job: MIN PGs | MAX PGs | MIN USE % | MAX USE % 322 | 338 | 73,3 | 75,5 Although the number of PGs per OSD differs a bit the usage per OSD is quite good (and more important). The new hardware also arrived, so

[ceph-users] Re: which grafana version to use with 17.2.x ceph version

Hi, cephadm stores a local copy of the cephadm binary in /var/lib/ceph/{FSID}/cephad.{DIGEST}: quincy-1:~ # ls -lrt /var/lib/ceph/{FSID}/cephadm.* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 350889 26. Okt 2023 /var/lib/ceph/{FSID}/cephadm.f6868821c084cd9740b59c7c5eb59f0dd47f6e3b1e6fecb542cb44134ace8d78 -rw-r-

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph Squid released?

On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 11:50 PM Alwin Antreich wrote: > Hi Robert, > > well it says it in the article. > > > The upcoming Squid release serves as a testament to how the Ceph project > > continues to deliver innovative features to users without compromising on > > quality. > > > I believe it is m

[ceph-users] Re: rbd-mirror failed to query services: (13) Permission denied

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 8:28 PM Stefan Kooman wrote: > > On 23-04-2024 17:44, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 7:45 PM Stefan Kooman wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> We are testing rbd-mirroring. There seems to be a permission error with > >> the rbd-mirror user. Using this user to q

[ceph-users] Re: ceph recipe for nfs exports

Hi you all, I did the changes suggested but the situation is still the same, I set the squash to "all", since I want only "nobody:nogroup" ids but I can't understand where the path should point. If I understood it well, I pass a far disks ( unpartitioined and so unformatted ) to the osd da

[ceph-users] Re: ceph recipe for nfs exports

On 4/29/24 17:21, Roberto Maggi @ Debian wrote: I can mount it correctly, but when I try to write or touch any file in it, it returns me "Permission denied" Works as expected. You have set squash to all, now every NFS client is mapped to nobody on the server. But only root is able to write

[ceph-users] Re: MDS Behind on Trimming...

Hi Xiubo, Is there any way to possibly get a PR development release we could upgrade to, in order to test and see if the lock order bug per Bug #62123 could be the answer? Although I'm not sure that bug has been fixed yet? -erich On 4/21/24 9:39 PM, Xiubo Li wrote: Hi Erich, I raised one

[ceph-users] Re: MDS Behind on Trimming...

On 4/30/24 04:05, Erich Weiler wrote: Hi Xiubo, Is there any way to possibly get a PR development release we could upgrade to, in order to test and see if the lock order bug per Bug #62123 could be the answer?  Although I'm not sure that bug has been fixed yet? I think you can get the test