Hi,
Cool, thanks!
As for the global_id_reclaim settings:
root@proxmox01:~# ceph config get mon
auth_allow_insecure_global_id_reclaim
false
root@proxmox01:~# ceph config get mon
auth_expose_insecure_global_id_reclaim
true
root@proxmox01:~# ceph config get mon
mon_warn_on_insecure_global_id_r
I decided to try to bring the mon back manually after looking at the
logs without any findings. It's kind of ugly but it worked. The
problem with that approach is that I had to take down a second MON to
inject a new monmap (which then includes the failed MON), restart it
and do the same for
Hello team,
I failed to login to my ceph dashboard which is running pacific as version
and deployed using ceph-ansible . I have set admin password using the
following command : "ceph dashboard ac-user-set-password admin -i
ceph-dash-pass" where ceph-dash-pass possesses the real password. I am
gett
Have you tried to enable it?
# ceph dashboard ac-user-enable admin
Zitat von Michel Niyoyita :
Hello team,
I failed to login to my ceph dashboard which is running pacific as version
and deployed using ceph-ansible . I have set admin password using the
following command : "ceph dashboard ac-u
Thank you very much Sir , now it works.
Michel
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:55 AM Eugen Block wrote:
> Have you tried to enable it?
>
> # ceph dashboard ac-user-enable admin
>
> Zitat von Michel Niyoyita :
>
> > Hello team,
> >
> > I failed to login to my ceph dashboard which is running pacific
Hello, Ceph users,
I would like to use my secondary Ceph cluster for backing up RBD OpenNebula
volumes from my primary cluster using mirroring in image+snapshot mode.
Because it is for backups only, not a cold-standby, I would like to use
erasure coding on the secondary side to save a disk
Shiming in here, just so that it’s indexed in archives.
We’ve have a lot of issues with tombstones when running RGW usage logging and
when we
trim those the Ceph OSD hosting that usage.X object will basically kill the OSD
performance
due to the tombstones being so many, restarting the OSD solves
I found the internal note I made about it, see below.
When we trim thousands of OMAP keys in RocksDB this calls
SingleDelete() in the RocksDBStore in Ceph, this causes tombstones in
the RocksDB database.
These thousands of tombstones that each needs to be iterated over wh
On 01.02.24 00:20, Matthew Melendy wrote:
In our department we're getting starting with Ceph 'reef', using Ceph
FUSE client for our Ubuntu workstations.
So far so good, except I can't quite figure out one aspect of subvolumes.
AFAIK subvolumes were introduced to be used with Kubernetes and ot
Happy Friday all. I was hoping someone could point me in the right
direction or clarify any limitations that could be impacting an issue I
am having.
I'm struggling to add a new set of hosts to my ceph cluster using
cephadm and orchestration. When trying to add a host:
"ceph orch host a
Hi cephers,
I've been looking into better balancing our clusters with upmaps lately,
and ran into upmap cases that behave in a less than ideal way. If there
is any cycle in the upmaps like
ceph osd pg-upmap-items a b b a
or
ceph osd pg-upmap-items a b b c c a
the upmap validation passes,
Chris,
Thanks for all the investigations you are doing here. We're on
quincy/debian11. Is there any working path at this point to
reef/debian12? Ideally I want to go in two steps. Upgrade ceph first
or upgrade debian first, then do the upgrade to the other one. Most of
our infra is already
Hi group,
Today I conducted a small experiment to test an assumption of mine,
namely that Ceph incurs a substantial network overhead when doing many
small files.
One RBD was created, and on top of that an XFS containing 1.6 M files,
each with size 10 kiB:
# rbd info libvirt/bobtest
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 7:44 AM Ruben Vestergaard wrote:
> Is the RBD client performing partial object reads? Is that even a thing?
Yup! The rados API has both length and offset parameters for reads
(https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/api/librados/#c.rados_aio_read)
and writes
(https://docs.ce
On Fri, Feb 02 2024 at 07:51:36 -0700, Josh Baergen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 7:44 AM Ruben Vestergaard wrote:
Is the RBD client performing partial object reads? Is that even a thing?
Yup! The rados API has both length and offset parameters for reads
(https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados
On 02/02/2024 16:41, Ruben Vestergaard wrote:
Hi group,
Today I conducted a small experiment to test an assumption of mine,
namely that Ceph incurs a substantial network overhead when doing many
small files.
One RBD was created, and on top of that an XFS containing 1.6 M files,
each with s
Hi,
A little basic question.
I created a volume with
ceph fs volume
then a subvolume called «erasure» I can see that with
root@cthulhu1:/etc/ceph# ceph fs subvolume info cephfs erasure
{
"atime": "2024-02-02 11:02:07",
"bytes_pcent": "undefined",
"bytes_quota": "infinite",
Hi,
I have a small cluster with some faulty disks within it and I want to clone
the data from the faulty disks onto new ones.
The cluster is currently down and I am unable to do things like
ceph-bluestore-fsck but ceph-bluestore-tool bluefs-export does appear to
be working.
Any help would be app
Hi Matthew
AFAIK the upgrade from quincy/deb11 to reef/deb12 is not possible:
* The packaging problem you can work around, and a fix is pending
* You have to upgrade both the OS and Ceph in one step
* The MGR will not run under deb12 due to the PyO3 lack of support for
subinterpreters.
If
Hi Carl,
you might want to use ceph-objectstore-tool to export PGs from faulty
OSDs and import them back to healthy ones.
The process could be quite tricky though.
There is also pending PR (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54991) to
make the tool more tolerant to disk errors.
The patch wo
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:21 AM Chris Palmer wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew
>
> AFAIK the upgrade from quincy/deb11 to reef/deb12 is not possible:
>
> * The packaging problem you can work around, and a fix is pending
> * You have to upgrade both the OS and Ceph in one step
> * The MGR will not run un
Would migrating to a cephadm orchestrated docker/podman cluster be an
acceptable workaround?
We are running that config with reef containers on Debian 12 hosts, with a
couple of debian 12 clients successfully mounting cephfs mounts, using the
reef client packages directly on Debian.
On Fri, Feb 2
We have fundamental problems with the concept of cephadm and its
direction of travel. But that's a different story.
The nub of this problem is a design incompatibility with MGR and the
PyO3 package that python-cryptography relies on. It's actually unsafe as
it is, and the new package just stop
Le 02/02/2024 à 16:34:17+0100, Albert Shih a écrit
> Hi,
>
>
> A little basic question.
>
> I created a volume with
>
> ceph fs volume
>
> then a subvolume called «erasure» I can see that with
>
> root@cthulhu1:/etc/ceph# ceph fs subvolume info cephfs erasure
> {
> "atime": "2024-02-
We've seen issues with high index OSD latencies in multiple scenarios over the
past couple of years. The issues related to rocksdb tombstones could certainly
be relevant, but compact on deletion has been very effective for us in that
regard. Recently, we experienced a similar issue at a higher l
You adjusted osd_memory_target? Higher than the default 4GB?
>
>
> Another thing that we've found is that rocksdb can become quite slow if it
> doesn't have enough memory for internal caches. As our cluster usage has
> grown, we've needed to increase OSD memory in accordance with bucket index
Yes, we changed osd_memory_target to 10 GB on just our index OSDs. These OSDs
have over 300 GB of lz4 compressed bucket index omap data. Here is a graph
showing the latencies before/after that single change:
https://pasteboard.co/IMCUWa1t3Uau.png
Cory Snyder
From: Anthony D'Atri
Sent: Friday
1024 PGs on NVMe.
From: Anthony D'Atri
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 2:37 PM
To: Cory Snyder
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] OSD read latency grows over time
Thanks. What type of media are your index OSDs? How many PGs? > On Feb 2, 2024,
at 2: 32 PM, Cory Snyder wrote: > > Yes, we changed
osd_m
Hi,
if the OSDs are deployed as LVs (by ceph-volume) you could try to do a
pvmove to a healthy disk. There was a thread here a couple of weeks
ago explaining the steps. I don’t have it at hand right now, but it
should be easy to find.
Of course, there’s no guarantee that this will be succes
Hi Cory,
Thanks for the excellent information here! I'm super curious how much
the kv cache is using in this case. If you happen to have a dump from
the perf counters that includes the prioritycache subsystem that would
be ideal. By default, onode (meta) and rocksdb (except for onodes
sto
30 matches
Mail list logo
