Hi Cory,
2023年6月16日(金) 0:54 Cory Snyder :
> Hi Satoru,
>
> Unfortunately suspending versioning on a bucket prior to resharding does
> not work around this issue.
>
Sure. Thank you for your quick response.
> Is it possible to stop client requests to the relevant bucket during
> resharding?
>
I
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:58:40PM +, Beaman, Joshua wrote:
We resolved our HAProxy woes by creating a custom jinja2 template and deploying
as:
ceph config-key set mgr/cephadm/services/ingress/haproxy.cfg -i
/tmp/haproxy.cfg.j2
Thanks, wish I knew that a few month ago before I threw out i
Nice find! Totally looks buggy. Also thanks for sharing that command…I love a
good one-liner!
Josh Beaman
From: Kai Stian Olstad
Date: Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:35 AM
To: Beaman, Joshua
Cc: ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [ceph-users] How to change RGW certificate in Cephadm?
On
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 2:55 AM Christian Rohmann
wrote:
>
> On 15/06/2023 15:46, Casey Bodley wrote:
>
> * In case of HTTP via headers like "X-Forwarded-For". This is
> apparently supported only for logging the source in the "rgw ops log" ([1])?
> Or is this info used also when evaluating the s
Hello everyone,
can someone explain, or direct me to some documentation that explains the role
of the blocklists (former blacklist). What do they useful for? how do they work?
Thank you,
Laszlo
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To uns
Hi Janek,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 5:31 AM Janek Bevendorff
wrote:
>
> Good news: We haven't had any new fill-ups so far. On the contrary, the
> pool size is as small as it's ever been (200GiB).
Great!
> Bad news: The MDS are still acting strangely. I have very uneven session
> load and I don't
Hello,
I configured different back-end storage on OpenStack (Yoga release) and using
Ceph (ceph version 17.2.4) with different pools (volumes, cloud-basic,
shared-hosting-os, shared-hosting-homes,...) for RBD application.
I created different volume types towards each of the backends and everythin
Greetings. My cluster consists of 3 nodes. Each node has 4 OSD HDDs with a
capacity of 6 TB each and 1 nvme for db/wal storage. 2 * 10Gbps network
assembled in bond and some parameters changed in rc.local to improve
performance. They are below:
#Set network interface buffer size
ethtool -G eno1
The osd daemon finally disappeared without further intervention. I guess I
should have had more patience and wait the purge process to finish.
Thanks to everybody who helped.
Nicola
Il 15 giugno 2023 15:02:16 CEST, Nicola Mori ha scritto:
>
>I have been able to (sort-of) fix the problem by remo
Hi ceph gurus,
I am experimenting with rgw multisite sync feature using Quincy release
(17.2.5). I am using the zone-level sync, not bucket-level sync policy. During
my experiment, somehow my setup got into a situation that it doesn't seem to
get out of. One zone is perpetually behind the other
If you create new crush rule for ssd/nvme/hdd and attach it to existing
pool you should be able to do the migration seamlessly while everything is
online... However impact to user will depend on storage devices load and
network utilization as it will create chaos on cluster network.
Or did i get s
After cluster enters healthy state mgr should re-check stray daemons, a lot
of activities are on hold while cluster is in warning state.
In the event it does not disappear after cluster is healthy than mgr
restart should help.
Kind regards,
Nino
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 10:24 PM Nicola Mori w
What got lost is that I need to change the pool’s m/k parameters, which is only
possible by creating a new pool and moving all data from the old pool. Changing
the crush rule doesn’t allow you to do that.
> On 16. Jun 2023, at 23:32, Nino Kotur wrote:
>
> If you create new crush rule for ssd/
Hello Users,
Greetings. We've a Ceph Cluster with the version
*ceph version 14.2.5-382-g8881d33957
(8881d33957b54b101eae9c7627b351af10e87ee8) nautilus (stable)*
5 PGs belonging to our RGW 8+3 EC Pool are stuck in incomplete and
incomplete+remapped states. Below are the PGs,
# ceph pg dump_stuck i
True, good luck with that, its kind of a tedious process that takes just
too long time :(
Nino
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 7:48 AM Christian Theune wrote:
> What got lost is that I need to change the pool’s m/k parameters, which is
> only possible by creating a new pool and moving all data from th
problem is just that some of your OSDs have too much PGs and pool cannot
recover as it cannot create more PGs
[osd.214,osd.223,osd.548,osd.584] have slow ops.
too many PGs per OSD (330 > max 250)
I'd have to guess that the safest thing would be permanently or temporarily
adding more s
16 matches
Mail list logo
