> > ceph osd setcrushmap -i /tmp/crush.new
> >
> > Note: If you are overwriting your current rule, your data will need to
> > rebalance as soon as your set the crushmap, close to 100% of your
> > objects will move. If you create a new rule, you can set your pool to
> > use the new pool id anytime y
Hi, Eric
Thank you for your reply.
> I don’t believe there is any tooling to find and clean orphaned bucket index
> shards. So if you’re certain they’re no longer needed, you can use `rados`
> commands to remove the objects.
I'll delete the bucket index shard object using the rados command as
As I already said, it's possible that your inactive PGs prevent the
RGWs from starting. You can turn on debug logs for the RGWs, maybe
they reveal more.
Zitat von Monish Selvaraj :
Hi Eugen,
The OSD fails because of RAM/CPU overloaded whatever it is.After Osd fails
it starts again. That's
Hello List,
i'm on the way to upgrade our "non cephadm" from Octopus to Quiny. It
fails/stuck on third ceph-mon ceph1n021 with an strange error:
2022-09-28T11:04:27.691+0200 7f8681543880 -1 _open error initializing
leveldb db back storage in /var/lib/ceph/mon/ceph-ceph1n021/store.db
This monito
Hi Eugen,
Kindly tell me the command to enable debug log for rgw.
Also after all the pg inactive problems were resolved the rgw wont
start.The ceph health becomes ok and in the pg status there is no working,
warning and unknown pgs are there.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 2:37 PM Eugen Block wrote:
To turn on debug logs on one daemon you can try this:
host1:~ # ceph orch ps --daemon-type rgw
NAME HOSTPORTS STATUS
REFRESHED AGE MEM USE MEM LIM VERSION IMAGE ID CONTAINER ID
rgw.ebl-rgw.host3.pjlrvr host3 running (12s) 7s a
Hi,
there was a thread about deprecating leveldb [1], but I didn't get the
impression that it already has been deprecated. But the thread
mentions that it's not tested anymore, so that might explain it. To
confirm that you use leveldb you can run:
cat /var/lib/ceph/mon/ceph-/kv_backend
S
Hi,
ceph requires the "public network" (including the MONs) because
clients contact MONs to request the osdmap so they can contact the
OSDs directly (also via public network). If required you can separate
the replication traffic between OSDs and introduce the "cluster
network". That's it.
Eugen,
thank you very much. This (ceph1n021) is indeed the one using leveldb (in
kv_backend)
Other mons have kv_backend "rocksdb" but unfortunately after reinstalling
ceph-mon@ceph1n021 we get no ceph status anymore and our mon logs get filed
with:
2022-09-28T13:10:54.822+0200 7fbc6a863700 0 l
Eugen,
i had to restart all five monitors from scratch, so now i have a valid
quorum 5/5 and all mons are v17.2.3.
This was really strange. The main problem seemingly was:
mon.ceph1n011@0(electing) e46 handle_auth_request failed to assign global_id
and so forth...
The one Mon with levelb i did
Sorry, I was busy and couldn't reply. But it's great that the issue is
resolved!
Zitat von "Ackermann, Christoph" :
Eugen,
i had to restart all five monitors from scratch, so now i have a valid
quorum 5/5 and all mons are v17.2.3.
This was really strange. The main problem seemingly was:
mo
FWIW, this is what the Quincy release notes say: LevelDB support has
been removed. WITH_LEVELDB is no longer a supported build option.
Users should migrate their monitors and OSDs to RocksDB before
upgrading to Quincy.
Josh
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:20 AM Eugen Block wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> there was
Josh,
only one monitor was on kv_backend leveldb by mistake. Initial cluster
version was Mimic as far as i know. Maybe I forgot this one to convert to
rocksdb in transit of Luminous or so... ;-)
Cheers,
Christoph
Am Mi., 28. Sept. 2022 um 15:18 Uhr schrieb Josh Baergen <
jbaer...@digitalocean
I have a strange situation where I have uploaded a txt file to a folder set the
permissions correctly. Yet still I am getting an access denied message[1]. If I
put some zip file in the same folder, apply the same permissions I have no
problems accessing it[2].
Is there anything known about such
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:24 PM Sagittarius-A Black Hole
wrote:
>
> No, I actually included the ceph fstype, just not in my example (the
> initial post), but the key is really mds_namespace for specifying the
> filesystem, this should be included in the documentation.
We removed mds_namespace fr
Hi,
>From what I've discovered so far with one bucket and one topic max out on our
>system around ~1k second notifications but multiple buckets with multiple
>topics (even if the topics all point to the same push endpoint gives more
>performance), still digging.
Steven Goodliff
Global Relay
Budget Discussion
- Going to investigate current resources being used, see if any costs
can be cut
- What can be moved from virtual environments to internal ones?
- Need to take inventory of what resources we currently have and what
their costs are
17.2.4
- Gibba and LRC cluste
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 9:15 AM Adam King wrote:
> Budget Discussion
>
>- Going to investigate current resources being used, see if any costs
>can be cut
>- What can be moved from virtual environments to internal ones?
>- Need to take inventory of what resources we currently have
Hi,
We have a cephadm-based Octopus (upgraded to 15.2.17 today but the
problem started with 15.2.16) cluster where we try to deploy a RGW in
multisite configuration. We followed the documentation at
https://docs.ceph.com/en/octopus/radosgw/multisite/ to do the basic
realm, zonegroup, zone and
Folks,
I have 15 nodes for ceph and each node has a 160TB disk attached. I am
using cephadm quincy release and all 14 nodes have been added except one
node which is giving a very strange error during adding it. I have put all
logs here https://paste.opendev.org/show/bbSKwlSLyANMbrlhwzXL/
In short
Thank you very much for the clarifications.
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
Thanks a lot for the explanation. It makes the most sense.
After testing using the FIO and ETHTOOL tools I discovered that my problem
was the network interface. After replacing it I managed to reach the mark
of 1150 Megabytes per second.
Em seg., 26 de set. de 2022 às 03:58, Janne Johansson
escr
Good evening everyone.
I setup a cluster with three machines, each with two network interfaces,
one for the public network and one for the cluster network (172.25.50.0/24
for public and 10.10.10.0/24 for cluster). All machines see each other and
are communicable in their respective networks. So fa
Hi Junior,
>> >- a.3 How to run Teuthology in my local environment?
>>
>> At this point, we have the ability to run some tests locally using
>> teuthology, Junior (cc'ed here) did a presentation on this topic,
>> which was recorded here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZHcg0oVzhY.
>
> Thank y
One additional information that may be relevant for the problem: the
server hosting the RGW has 2 networks configured on the same interface
and the default one is not the Ceph public network but another network
not related to Ceph. I suspect a Podman configuration issue where the
default networ
25 matches
Mail list logo
