On Do, 2022-07-28 at 07:50 +1000, Brad Hubbard wrote:
> The primary cause of the issues with ca is that octopus was pinned to
> the stable_6.0 branch of ca for octopus should be using stable_5.0
> according to https://docs.ceph.com/projects/ceph-ansible/en/latest/#releases
>
> I don't believe this
Hi Frank,
I think you need at least 6 OSD hosts to make EC 4+2 with faillure domain host.
I do not know how it was possible for you to create that configuration at
first?
Could it be that you have multiple name for the OSD hosts?
That would at least explain the one OSD down, being show as tw
Ah I see, should have look at the “raw” data instead ;-)
Then I agree this very weird?
Best,
Jesper
--
Jesper Lykkegaard Karlsen
Scientific Computing
Centre for Structural Biology
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics
Aarhus University
Universitetsbyen 81
8000 Aar
Hi Ceph Users,
I am currently evaluating different cluster layouts and as a test I stopped two
of my three monitors while client traffic was running on the nodes.?
Only when I restartet an OSD all PGs which were related to that OSD went down,
but the rest were still active and serving request
I have a 7 node cluster which is complaining that:
root@s1:~# ceph -s
cluster:
id: a6092407-216f-41ff-bccb-9bed78587ac3
health: HEALTH_WARN
1 nearfull osd(s)
4 pool(s) nearfull
services:
mon: 3 daemons, quorum sm1,2,s5
mgr: s1(active), standbys: s5,
Hi,
I'd like to understand if the following behaviour is a bug.
I'm running ceph 16.2.9.
In a new OSD node with 24 hdd (16 TB each) and 2 ssd (1.44 TB each), I'd like
to have "ceph orch" allocate WAL and DB on the ssd devices.
I use the following service spec:
spec:
data_devices:
rotation
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 5:32 AM Johannes Liebl wrote:
>
> Hi Ceph Users,
>
>
> I am currently evaluating different cluster layouts and as a test I stopped
> two of my three monitors while client traffic was running on the nodes.?
>
>
> Only when I restartet an OSD all PGs which were related to th
Hello,
We have exactly the same problem. Did you find an answer or should we
open a bug report?
Sincerely,
Nicolas.
Le 23/06/2022 à 11:42, Kilian Ries a écrit :
Hi Joachim,
yes i assigned the stretch rule to the pool (4x replica / 2x min). The rule
says that two replicas should be in eve
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:01 AM Frank Schilder wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to set a quota on the ceph fs file system root, but it fails with
> "setfattr: /mnt/adm/cephfs: Invalid argument". I can set quotas on any
> sub-directory. Is this intentional? The documentation
> (https://docs.cep
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56650
There's a PR in progress to resolve this issue now. (Thanks, Prashant!)
-Greg
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 7:52 AM Nicolas FONTAINE wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We have exactly the same problem. Did you find an answer or should we
> open a bug report?
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 4:54 PM wrote:
>
> Currently, all of the nodes are running in docker. The only way to upgrade is
> to redeploy with docker (ceph orch daemon redeploy), which is essentially
> making a new monitor. Am I missing something?
Apparently. I don't have any experience with Docke
I've just taken another look at the orch ps output you posted and noticed
that the REFRESHED column is reporting "62m sgo". That makes it seem like
the issue is that cephadm isn't actually running its normal operations (it
should refresh daemons every 10 minutes by default). I guess maybe we
should
Hello,
I have an octopus cluster with 3 OSD hosts. Each of them has 13 daemons
belonging to different storage classes.
I'd like to have multiple osd_memory_target settings for each class.
In the documentation there's some mention of setting different bluestore cache
sizes for HDDs and SSDs, bu
Hi Frank,
I guess there is alway the possibility to set quota on pool level with
"target_max_objects" and “target_max_bytes”
The cephfs quotas through attributes are only for sub-directories as far as I
recall.
Best,
Jesper
--
Jesper Lykkegaard Karlsen
Scientific Com
Hi Adam,
Have you tried ‘cephfs.LibCephFS(auth_id="monitoring")’?
Weiwen Hu
> 在 2022年7月27日，20:41，Adam Carrgilson (NBI) 写道：
>
> I’m still persevering with this, if anyone can assist, I would truly
> appreciate it.
>
> As I said previously, I’ve been able to identify that the error is
> spec
We use Ceph RBD/FS extensively and are starting down our RGW journey. We have 3
sites and want to replicate buckets from a single “primary” to multiple
“backup” site. Each site has a Ceph cluster and they are all configured as part
of a Multisite setup.
I am using the instructions at
https://d
We use Ceph RBD/FS extensively and are starting down our RGW journey. We
have 3 sites and want to replicate buckets from a single "primary" to
multiple "backup" sites. Each site has a Ceph cluster and they are all
configured as part of a Multisite setup.
I am using the examples at
https://d
On 7/28/22 22:19, Mark Selby wrote:
/usr/include/c++/8/optional:714: constexpr _Tp& std::_Optional_base<_Tp, ,
>::_M_get() [with _Tp = rgw_bucket; bool = false; bool = false]: Assertion
'this->_M_is_engaged()' failed.
*** Caught signal (Aborted) **
in thread 7f0092e41380 thread_name:radosg
On 7/28/22 22:41, Mark Selby wrote:
We use Ceph RBD/FS extensively and are starting down our RGW journey. We
have 3 sites and want to replicate buckets from a single "primary" to
multiple "backup" sites. Each site has a Ceph cluster and they are all
configured as part of a Multisite setup.
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 3:45:30 PM EDT Vladimir Brik wrote:
> count_per_host worked!
>
> I create a ticket.
Good to hear. Thanks!
>
> > Regardless of whether this is a good idea or not the
>
> option is a
>
> > generic one and should be handled gracefully. :-)
>
> Do you mean running mu
Thanks you for your suggestions Josh, it is really appreciated.
Pgremapper looks interesting and definitely something I will look into.
I know the balancer will reach a well balanced PG landscape eventually, but I
am not sure that it will prioritise backfill after “most available location”
fi
Cool thanks a lot!
I will definitely put it in my toolbox.
Best,
Jesper
--
Jesper Lykkegaard Karlsen
Scientific Computing
Centre for Structural Biology
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics
Aarhus University
Universitetsbyen 81
8000 Aarhus C
E-mail: je...@mbg.au
Dear all
I have a CephFS filesystem storage cluster with version pacific mounted on
a linux server using the kernel client.
Then share the stored mount directory to the windows client by deploying
the samba service.
Sometimes it is found that some workloads from Windows will have a lot of
metadata
23 matches
Mail list logo
