I would recommend Intel S4510 series, which has power loss protection (PLP).
If you do not care about PLP, lower-cost Samsung 870EVO and Crucial MX500
should also be OK (with separate DB/WAL on enterprise SSD with PLP)
Samuel
huxia...@horebdata.cn
From: by morphin
Date: 2021-05-30 02:48
T
I've actually managed to get a little further with my problem.
As I've said before these servers are slightly distorted in config.
63 drives and only 48g if memory.
Once I create about 15-20 osds it continues to format the disks but won't
actually create the containers or start any service.
Wor
Reed,
I'd like to add to Sebastian's comments - the problem is probably rsync.
I inherited a smaller setup than you when I assumed my current
responsibilities - an XFS file system on a RAID and exported over NFS. The
backup process is based on RSnapshot, which is based on rsync over SSH, but
the
Hello Samuel. Thanks for the answer.
Yes the Intel S4510 series is a good choice but it's expensive.
I have 21 server and data distribution is quite well.
At power loss I don't think I'll lose data. All the VM's using same
image and the rest is cookie.
In this case I'm not sure I should spend extr
Pls check Crucial MX500 2TB drive, i think it is a bit cheaper than Samsung 970
EVO, and it is reliable as well.
samuel
From: mhnx
Date: 2021-05-30 20:45
To: huxia...@horebdata.cn
CC: Anthony D'Atri; ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: SSD recommendations for RBD and VM's
Hello Samuel. Th
Hi all,
I want to ask your opinion which Ceph deploy version is better: using
cephadm(docker) or installing from packages?
Cephadm brings lots of convenience: easy upgrade (which sometimes stucks
but still), easy add new OSDs, ability to make placement policies etc.
In contrary I seem to lo
