[ceph-users] Re: libceph: get_reply osd2 tid 1459933 data 3248128 > preallocated 131072, skipping

2021-04-25 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 12:37 AM Markus Kienast wrote: > > I am seeing these messages when booting from RBD and booting hangs there. > > libceph: get_reply osd2 tid 1459933 data 3248128 > preallocated > 131072, skipping > > However, Ceph Health is OK, so I have no idea what is going on. I > reboot

[ceph-users] Re: [Suspicious newsletter] RGW: Multiple Site does not sync olds data

2021-04-25 Thread 特木勒
Hi Istvan: Thanks Amit's suggestion. I followed his suggestion to fix bucket index and re-do sync on buckets, but it still did not work for me. Then I tried to use bucket rewrite command to rewrite all the objects in buckets and it works for me. I think the reason is there's something wrong with

[ceph-users] Re: [Suspicious newsletter] RGW: Multiple Site does not sync olds data

2021-04-25 Thread 特木勒
Another problem I notice for a new bucket, the first object in the bucket will not be sync. the sync will start with the second object. I tried to fix the index on the bucket and manually rerun bucket sync, but the first object still does not sync with secondary cluster. Do you have any ideas for

[ceph-users] PG can't deep and simple scrub after unfound data delete

2021-04-25 Thread Szabo, Istvan (Agoda)
Hi, I have a pg where it has been run the following command: ceph pg 44.1aa mark_unfound_lost delete After the cluster never report the unknown pgs which was actually the goal to ran this. However this pg is now inconsistent and can't be deepscrubbed. ceph health detail HEALTH_ERR 214275 scrub

[ceph-users] Re: [Suspicious newsletter] RGW: Multiple Site does not sync olds data

2021-04-25 Thread Szabo, Istvan (Agoda)
Hi, No, doesn’t work, now we will write our own sync app for ceph, I gave up. Istvan Szabo Senior Infrastructure Engineer --- Agoda Services Co., Ltd. e: istvan.sz...@agoda.com -