[ceph-users] Re: vfs_ceph and permissions

2019-09-23 Thread ceph-users
Hi all, I was not able to solve the problems with vfs_ceph, however I got it working using the kernel mount driver (https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/cephfs/kernel/). I can't find the post right now, but I understand that the vfs module is promising better features going forward but the kernel

[ceph-users] Re: vfs_ceph and permissions

2019-09-11 Thread Konstantin Shalygin
On 9/12/19 2:04 AM, ceph-us...@dxps31.33mail.com wrote: Thanks both for the pointer! Even with the vfs objects on the same line I get the same result. This is the testparm for the share (I'm logged in as SAMDOM\Administrator): [data] acl group control = Yes admin users = "@Dom

[ceph-users] Re: vfs_ceph and permissions

2019-09-11 Thread ceph-users
Hi! Thanks both for the pointer! Even with the vfs objects on the same line I get the same result. This is the testparm for the share (I'm logged in as SAMDOM\Administrator): [data] acl group control = Yes admin users = "@Domain Admins" "SAMDOM\Domain Admins" SAMDOM\Administrato

[ceph-users] Re: vfs_ceph and permissions

2019-09-10 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! Konstantin Shalygin In chel di` si favelave... > > vfs objects = acl_xattr full_audit [...] > > vfs objects = ceph > You have doubled `vfs objects` option, but this option is stackable and > should be `vfs objects = acl_xattr full_audit ceph`, I think... Yes, the latter overri

[ceph-users] Re: vfs_ceph and permissions

2019-09-09 Thread Konstantin Shalygin
On 9/7/19 8:59 PM, ceph-us...@dxps31.33mail.com wrote: [data2] browseable = yes force create mode = 0660 force directory mode = 0660 valid users = @"Domain Users", @"Domain Admins", @"Domain Admins" read list = write list = @"Domain Users", @"Domain Admins" admi