[ceph-users] Re: pg deep scrubbing issue

2023-01-03 Thread Jeffrey Turmelle
Thank you Anthony. I did have an empty pool that I had provisioned for developers that was never used. I’ve removed that pool and the 0 object PGs are gone. I don’t know why I didn’t realize that. Removing that pool halved the # of PGs not scrubbed in time. This is entirely an HDD cluster.

[ceph-users] Re: pg deep scrubbing issue

2023-01-02 Thread Anthony D'Atri
Look closely at your output. The PGs with 0 objects. Are only “every other” due to how the command happened to order the output. Note that the empty PGs all have IDs matching “3.*”. The numeric prefix of a PG ID reflects the cardinal ID of the pool to which it belongs. I strongly suspect that

[ceph-users] Re: pg deep scrubbing issue

2023-01-02 Thread Jeffrey Turmelle
Thanks for the reply. I’ll give that a try, I wasn’t using the balancer. > On Jan 2, 2023, at 1:55 AM, Pavin Joseph wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > > Might be worth checking the balancer [0] status, also you probably want to > use upmap mode [1] if possible. > > [0]: https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/ra