[ceph-users] Re: performance between ceph-osd and crimson-osd

2021-08-23 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:40 AM Marc wrote: > > > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AXj9h0yDc2ztFWuptqcTrNU2Ui3wMyAn > > 6QUft3CPdcc/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > The gist of it is that on the read path, crimson+cyanstore is > > significantly more efficient than crimson+alienstore and an

[ceph-users] Re: performance between ceph-osd and crimson-osd

2021-08-19 Thread ­신희원 / 학생 / 컴퓨터공학부
Hi Igor, Thank you for answering. I understand what you are saying, but I still wonder why the crimson-osd (alienstore) has poor performance. I tested the performance on SeaStore also, but still ObjectStores which use crimson-osd (alienstore, seastore) have extremely poor performance. Do you have

[ceph-users] Re: performance between ceph-osd and crimson-osd

2021-08-19 Thread Maged Mokhtar
Can you run it with 4k block size , 1 thread. ( Default is 4M and 16 threads) $ rados bench -p rbd 10 write -b 4096 -t 1 --no-cleanup On 19/08/2021 04:22, 신희원 / 학생 / 컴퓨터공학부 wrote: Hi, I measured the performance of ceph-osd and crimson-osd with same single core affinity. I checked IOPS, Lat

[ceph-users] Re: performance between ceph-osd and crimson-osd

2021-08-19 Thread Igor Fedotov
Hi Shin, a side note -  you disk choice might be inappropriate for Ceph - AFAIK this is a consumer model which apparently lacks power loss protection. This causes dramatic performance drop when each write request is followed by fsync one. And this is the mode RocksDB/BlueFS work in. Hence ex

[ceph-users] Re: performance between ceph-osd and crimson-osd

2021-08-19 Thread Marc
> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AXj9h0yDc2ztFWuptqcTrNU2Ui3wMyAn > 6QUft3CPdcc/edit?usp=sharing > > > The gist of it is that on the read path, crimson+cyanstore is > significantly more efficient than crimson+alienstore and any classic > setup.  We are slower in terms of absolute perf

[ceph-users] Re: performance between ceph-osd and crimson-osd

2021-08-19 Thread ­신희원 / 학생 / 컴퓨터공학부
Hi Mark. Thanks for answering. I tested the performance on Samsung NVMe SSD 960 PRO 512GB, 2-way E5-2650(2.2GHz, 12-core) CPU , not HDD... Is it a problem that I check the performance on ceph that is deployed by 'vstart'..? Please tell me how to deploy ceph to achieve similar results..! Thank you

[ceph-users] Re: performance between ceph-osd and crimson-osd

2021-08-18 Thread Mark Nelson
On 8/18/21 9:22 PM, 신희원 / 학생 / 컴퓨터공학부 wrote: Hi, I measured the performance of ceph-osd and crimson-osd with same single core affinity. I checked IOPS, Latency by rados-bench write , and crimson-osd has lower performance than ceph-osd about 3 times. (ceph-osd(BlueStore): 228 IOPS, crimson-osd(Al