[ceph-users] Re: cephadm does not honor container_image default value

2023-05-31 Thread Daniel Krambrock
I reported the bug here: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61553 Am 15.05.23 um 14:50 schrieb Adam King: I think with the `config set` commands there is logic to notify the relevant mgr modules and update their values. That might not exist with `config rm`, so it's still using the last set value.

[ceph-users] Re: cephadm does not honor container_image default value

2023-05-15 Thread Joachim Kraftmayer - ceph ambassador
Don't know if it helps, but we have also experienced something similar with osd images. We changed the image tag from version to sha and it did not happen again. ___ ceph ambassador DACH ceph consultant since 2012 Clyso GmbH - Premier Ceph Foundation Member htt

[ceph-users] Re: cephadm does not honor container_image default value

2023-05-15 Thread Adam King
I think with the `config set` commands there is logic to notify the relevant mgr modules and update their values. That might not exist with `config rm`, so it's still using the last set value. Looks like a real bug. Curious what happens if the mgr restarts after the `config rm`. Whether it goes bac