Hey there,
thanks. We had/have the same problem and I was debugging it for a while
now as well.
We will test if the upgrade solves the problem on our side as well.
Thanks again for the thread.
Kind regards
Thomas
On 4/4/24 7:52 PM, Lorenz Bausch wrote:
Thank you again Casey for putting us
Thank you again Casey for putting us on the right track regarding the
changes in multisite resharding support.
When going through the various changelogs we didn't pay too much
attention to those changes as this cluster doesn't use any multisite
features.
We have now upgraded to Reef and all bu
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 3:09 PM Lorenz Bausch wrote:
>
> Hi Casey,
>
> thank you so much for analysis! We tested the upgraded intensively, but
> the buckets in our test environment were probably too small to get
> dynamically resharded.
>
> > after upgrading to the Quincy release, rgw would
> > loo
Hi Casey,
thank you so much for analysis! We tested the upgraded intensively, but
the buckets in our test environment were probably too small to get
dynamically resharded.
after upgrading to the Quincy release, rgw would
look at the wrong object names when trying to list those buckets.
As we
to expand on this diagnosis: with multisite resharding, we changed how
buckets name/locate their bucket index shard objects. any buckets that
were resharded under this Red Hat pacific release would be using the
new object names. after upgrading to the Quincy release, rgw would
look at the wrong obj
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:58 AM Lorenz Bausch wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> we upgraded our containerized Red Hat Pacific cluster to the latest
> Quincy release (Community Edition).
i'm afraid this is not an upgrade path that we try to test or support.
Red Hat makes its own decisions about what to
