Hi,
Quoting Paul Browne (pf...@cam.ac.uk):
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:52, Matthew Vernon wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 29/01/2020 16:40, Paul Browne wrote:
> >
> > > Recently we deployed a brand new Stein cluster however, and I'm curious
> > > whether the idea of pointing the new OpenStack cluste
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:52, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29/01/2020 16:40, Paul Browne wrote:
>
> > Recently we deployed a brand new Stein cluster however, and I'm curious
> > whether the idea of pointing the new OpenStack cluster at the same RBD
> > pools for Cinder/Glance/Nova as the Lu
..
From: tda...@hotmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 12:29 PM
To: ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Re: Servicing multiple OpenStack clusters from the same
Ceph cluster
Hello,
We have recently deployed that and it's working fine. We have deployed
diff
You should have used separate pool name scemes for each OpenStack cluster..
From: tda...@hotmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 12:29 PM
To: ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Re: Servicing multiple OpenStack clusters from the same
Ceph cluster
Hello,
We have recently deployed that and it's working fine. We have deployed
different keys for the different openstack clusters ofcourse and they are using
the same cinder/nova/glance pools.
The only risk is if a client from one openstack cluster creates a volume and
the id that will be gene
Hi,
On 29/01/2020 16:40, Paul Browne wrote:
> Recently we deployed a brand new Stein cluster however, and I'm curious
> whether the idea of pointing the new OpenStack cluster at the same RBD
> pools for Cinder/Glance/Nova as the Luminous cluster would be considered
> bad practice, or even potenti
