eidemann
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 4:39 PM
To: Paul Mezzanini
Cc: dhils...@performair.com; ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: Compression of data in existing cephfs EC pool
CAUTION: This message came from outside RIT. If you are unsure about the source
or content of this messag
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
> destroy any copies of this information.
> ------------
>
> ____________
> From: dhils...@performa
e sender and
destroy any copies of this information.
From: dhils...@performair.com
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 3:27 PM
To: Paul Mezzanini; ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: RE: [ceph-users] Re: Compression of data in existing cephfs EC pool
Paul;
I'm not familiar with rsync, but is it po
021 11:23 AM
To: Burkhard Linke; ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: [ceph-users] Re: Compression of data in existing cephfs EC pool
That does make sense and I wish it were true however what I'm seeing doesn't
support your hypothesis. I've had several drives die and be replaced since t
That does make sense and I wish it were true however what I'm seeing doesn't
support your hypothesis. I've had several drives die and be replaced since the
go-live date and I'm actually in the home stretch on reducing the pg_num on
that pool so pretty much every PG has already been moved severa
Hi,
On 1/4/21 5:27 PM, Paul Mezzanini wrote:
Hey everyone,
I've got an EC pool as part of our cephfs for colder data. When we started using it,
compression was still marked experimental. Since then it has become stable so I turned
compression on to "aggressive". Using 'ceph df detail' I ca
