[ceph-users] Re: Backfill full osds

2024-11-06 Thread Anthony D'Atri
I’ve successfully used a *temporary* relax of the ratios to get out of a sticky situation, but I must qualify that with an admonition to make SURE that you move them back ASAP. Note that backfillfull_ratio is enforced to be lower than full_ratio, so depending on how close to the precipice you s

[ceph-users] Re: Backfill full osds

2024-11-06 Thread Szabo, Istvan (Agoda)
This is the correct link sorry: https://gist.github.com/Badb0yBadb0y/f29af56ab724603ac5fc385a680c4316 From: Szabo, Istvan (Agoda) Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 10:09 PM To: Eugen Block ; ceph-users@ceph.io Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: Backfill full osds

[ceph-users] Re: Backfill full osds

2024-11-06 Thread Szabo, Istvan (Agoda)
users@ceph.io Subject: [ceph-users] Re: Backfill full osds Email received from the internet. If in doubt, don't click any link nor open any attachment ! Hi, depending on the actual size of the PGs and OSDs, it could be sufficient to temporarily in

[ceph-users] Re: Backfill full osds

2024-11-06 Thread Eugen Block
Hi, depending on the actual size of the PGs and OSDs, it could be sufficient to temporarily increase the backfillfull_ratio (default 90%) to 91% or 92%, at 95% is the cluster is considered full, so you need to be really careful with those ratios. If you provided more details about the cur