[ceph-users] Re: 9 out of 11 missing shards of shadow object in ERC 8:3 pool.

2024-11-12 Thread Eugen Block
Hi Robert, thanks for the update, it's great that the issue is resolved. Zitat von Robert Kihlberg : Thanks Josh and Eugen, I did not manage to trace this object to an S3 object. Instead I read all files in the suspected S3 bucket and actually hit a bad one. Since we had a known good mirror I

[ceph-users] Re: 9 out of 11 missing shards of shadow object in ERC 8:3 pool.

2024-10-31 Thread Robert Kihlberg
Thanks Josh and Eugen, I did not manage to trace this object to an S3 object. Instead I read all files in the suspected S3 bucket and actually hit a bad one. Since we had a known good mirror I deleted the broken S3 object (which succeeded fine) and uploaded the good one (also succeeded). Data wise

[ceph-users] Re: 9 out of 11 missing shards of shadow object in ERC 8:3 pool.

2024-10-05 Thread Eugen Block
This reminds me of this tracker: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/50351 IIRC, the information could be actually lost on the OSDs. I’m surprised that the number of missing shards is that high though. If you have the objects mirrored, maybe importing it with objectstore-tool could be a way fo

[ceph-users] Re: 9 out of 11 missing shards of shadow object in ERC 8:3 pool.

2024-10-04 Thread Joshua Baergen
We saw this a fair bit in Nautilus, and I also suspected that there was something up with GC'd and/or deleted objects, but we never determined the cause. Notably it seemed to happen on PGs ending in 'ff' or 'fff', which was extra suspicious. We haven't seen it since Pacific. Josh On Fri, Oct 4, 2