[ceph-users] Re: 6 PG's stuck not-active, remapped

2020-10-22 Thread Burkhard Linke
Hi, On 10/21/20 10:01 PM, Mac Wynkoop wrote: *snipsnap* *up: 0: 1131: 1382: 303: 1324: 1055: 576: 1067: 1408: 161acting: 0: 721: 1502: 21474836473: 21474836474: 245: 486: 327: 1578: 103* 21474836473 is -1 as unsigned integer. This value means that the CRUSH algorithm did not produce enough

[ceph-users] Re: 6 PG's stuck not-active, remapped

2020-10-21 Thread Mac Wynkoop
As an example, here's the acting and up set of one of the PG's: *up: 0: 1131: 1382: 303: 1324: 1055: 576: 1067: 1408: 161acting: 0: 721: 1502: 21474836473: 21474836474: 245: 486: 327: 1578: 103* So obviously there's a lot of backfilling there... but it seems it's not making an