Thank you very much Adam,
Really appreciate it.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:02 PM Adam King wrote:
> Unfortunately, I can't think of a workaround that doesn't involve a code
> change. I've created a tracker (https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/52745)
> and am working towards a fix for this, but I'm n
Unfortunately, I can't think of a workaround that doesn't involve a code
change. I've created a tracker (https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/52745) and
am working towards a fix for this, but I'm not sure how to deal with it
using the current 16.2.6 image. Maybe others will have some ideas.
On Mon, Sep
Good morning Adam, Ceph users,
Is there something we can do to extend the acceptable response size?
Trying to understand if there is some viable workaround that we can
implement.
Thanks,
Marco
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 2:59 PM Marco Pizzolo
wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> I really appreciate your time rev
It looks like the output from a ceph-volume command was too long to handle.
If you run "cephadm ceph-volume -- inventory --format=json" (add
"--with-lsm" if you've turned on device_enhanced_scan) manually on each
host do any of them fail in a similar fashion?
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 1:37 PM Marco
