; I don't expect this to be a showstopper, since having N+1 rgws in all
> other cases is equally susceptible to races regardless of the DNS name
> the client used to reach an rgw.
> After auth is done, I expect it to be quite similar if your client and
> my client ends up on differen
hat
solution.
>
>
> On 22/02/2021 14:29, Freddy Andersen wrote:
> > You need to enable users with tenants …
> https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/radosgw/multitenancy/
> >
> > From: Simon Pierre DESROSIERS
> > Date: Monday, February 22, 2021 at 7:27 AM
> > To: ceph-use
Le lun. 22 févr. 2021, à 10 h 34, Janne Johansson a
écrit :
> Den mån 22 feb. 2021 kl 15:27 skrev Simon Pierre DESROSIERS <
> simonpierre.desrosi...@montreal.ca>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have functional ceph swarm with a pair of S3 rgw in front that uses
>> A
Hello,
We have functional ceph swarm with a pair of S3 rgw in front that uses
A.B.C.D domain to be accessed.
Now a new client asks to have access using the domain : E.C.D, but to
already existing buckets. This is not a scenario discussed in the docs.
Apparently, looking at the code and by trying
