On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 02:06:49PM +0200, Boris wrote:
> Hi,
> I am in the process of checking orphan objects and the radoslist list grep
> over 300GB while the rados ls list was only 50GB.
>
> After some investigation I identified a saw that one bucket fell out with a
> lot of objects in the rado
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 08:52:30AM +, Marc wrote:
> I used to have a tool from hgst/wd to 'convert' drives to 4Kn, but
> after a mentally challenging interaction with some wd support, I
> decided to try and use other solutions mentioned on the internet
>
> this seems to produce output similar
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:43:13AM -0600, Laura Flores wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Ceph User Council is conducting a survey to gather insights from
> community members who actively use production Ceph clusters. We want to
> hear directly from you: *What is the use case of your production Ceph
> clust
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 12:01:52PM +, Paul Mezzanini wrote:
> We've reached the point of our ceph cluster's life where it make sense to
> have an outside vendor in the passenger seat with us. I already know of a
> few but I see value in having a thread consolidating this information so I'm
Hi Yuri et al,
The email announcement includes the fix for 61948, but the linked blog
page omits it entirely.
Suggest adding that note to the blog page.
The language used also differs slightly between the two announcements.
email:
> We're happy to announce the 4th release in the Reef series.
bl
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 01:16:22PM +, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We would like to repurpose some Dell PowerEdge R750s for a Ceph cluster.
>
> Currently the servers have one H755N RAID controller for each 8 drives. (2
> total)
The N variant of H755N specifically? So you have 16 NVME driv
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:20:44AM +0100, Malte Stroem wrote:
> Hello Robin,
>
> thanks a lot.
>
> Yes, I set debug to debug_rgw=20 & debug_ms=1.
>
> It's that 403 I always get.
>
> There is no versioning enabled.
>
> There is a lifecycle policy for removing the files after one day.
Did the ob
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 01:19:34PM +0100, Malte Stroem wrote:
> I checked the policies, lifecycle and versioning.
>
> Nothing. The user has FULL_CONTROL. Same settings for the user's other
> buckets he can still write to.
>
> Wenn setting debugging to higher numbers all I can see is something li
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 10:05:02AM -0500, Vladimir Sigunov wrote:
> Hello Community!
> I would appreciate any help/suggestions with the massive RGWs outage we are
> facing.
> The cluster's overall status is acceptable (HEALTH_WARN because of some pgs
> not scrubbed in time), and the cluster is oper
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 07:51:34PM +0100, Ondřej Kukla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some time now I’m struggling with the time it takes to
> CompleteMultipartUpload on one of my rgw clusters.
>
> I have a customer with ~8M objects in one bucket uploading quite a large
> files. From 100GB to like 800
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 03:21:11PM +, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Oh, well what I was going to do wAs just use SATA HBAs on PowerEdge R740s
> because we don't really care about performance as this is just used as a copy
> point for backups/archival but the current Ceph cluster we have [Which is
> b
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:32:12PM +, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So we were going to replace a Ceph cluster with some hardware we had
> laying around using SATA HBAs but I was told that the only right way
> to build Ceph in 2023 is with direct attach NVMe.
>
> Does anyone have any recomm
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:57:10AM +0100, Rok Jaklič wrote:
> Hi,
>
> shouldn't etag of a "parent" object change when "child" objects are added
> on s3?
>
> Example:
> 1. I add an object to test bucket: "example/" - size 0
> "example/" has an etag XYZ1
> 2. I add an object to test bucket: "ex
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:41:59AM +0100, marc@singer.services wrote:
> Hi Ceph users
>
> We are using Ceph Pacific (16) in this specific deployment.
>
> In our use case we do not want our users to be able to generate signature v4
> URLs because they bypass the policies that we set on buckets (e
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:09:22AM +0100, Boris Behrens wrote:
> Hi,
> I am looking for some experience on how people make their RGW public.
What level of fine-grained control do you have over DNS for your
environment?
If you can use a very short TTL, and dynamically update DNS rapidly,
maybe a DN
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 01:21:57AM -, Huy Nguyen wrote:
> Thanks for your reply,
> Yes, my setup is like the following:
> RGWs (port 8084) -> Nginx (80, 443)
>
> So this why it make me confuse when :8084 appear with the domain.
>
> And this behavior only occurs with PHP's generated url, not i
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:46:16AM -, Huy Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to generate a presigned url using SDK PHP, but it doesn't
> work. (I also tried to use boto3 with the same configures and the url
> works normally)
Do you have some sort of load-balancer in the setup? Either HAProxy,
Nginx,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 06:59:51PM +0100, Gaël THEROND wrote:
> Versioning wasn’t enabled, at least not explicitly and for the
> documentation it isn’t enabled by default.
>
> Using nautilus.
>
> I’ll get all the required missing information on tomorrow morning, thanks
> for the help!
>
> Is the
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 06:34:54PM +0100, Gaël THEROND wrote:
> Hi everyone, I’ve got a quick question regarding one of our RadosGW bucket.
>
> This bucket is used to store docker registries, and the total amount of
> data we use is supposed to be 4.5Tb BUT it looks like ceph told us we
> rather u
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 03:07:20PM -, Aggelos Toumasis wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We noticed after creating a signurl that the bucket resources were
> accessible from IPs that were originally restricted from accessing
> them (using a bucket policy). Using the s3cmd utility we confirmed
> that the
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:49:15AM +, Frank Schilder wrote:
> Returning to this thread, I finally managed to capture the problem I'm
> facing in a log. The time service to the outside world is blocked by
> our organisation's firewall and I'm restricted to use internal time
> servers. Unfortunat
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:39:12PM -0500, Casey Bodley wrote:
> hi Subu,
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 12:10 PM Subu Sankara Subramanian
> wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > Is there a bug in ceph RGW date parsing?
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/rgw/rgw_auth_s3.cc#L223 - this
> > line p
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:55:15AM -0400, Gavin Chen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We’ve got some issues when uploading s3 objects with a double slash //
> in the name, and was wondering if anyone else has observed this issue
> with uploading objects to the radosgw?
>
> When connecting to the cluster to up
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Loïc Dachary wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> TL;DR: Is it more advisable to work on Ceph internals to make it
> friendly to this particular workload or write something similar to
> EOS[0] (i.e Rocksdb + Xrootd + RBD)?
CERN's EOSPPC instance, which is one of the bigg
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 04:50:34PM +, t...@postix.net wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those who use encryption on your OSDs, what effect do you see on
> your NVMe, SSD and HDD vs non-encrypted OSDs? I tried to find some
> info on this subject but there isn't much detail available.
>
> >From experien
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:40:22AM -, Johannes L wrote:
> Hello Ceph-Users
>
> after upgrading one of our clusters to Nautilus we noticed the x pgs not
> scrubbed/deep-scrubbed in time warnings.
> Through some digging we found out that it seems like the scrubbing takes
> place at random and
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:28:14PM +, Alex Hussein-Kershaw wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem that old versions of S3 objects are not being deleted. Can
> anyone advise as to why? I'm using Ceph 14.2.9.
How many objects are in the bucket? If it's a lot, then you may run into
RGW's lifecycle
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:02:23PM +0200, Mariusz Gronczewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a problem on Octopus (15.2.3, debian packages) install, bucket
> S3 index shows a file:
>
> s3cmd ls s3://upvid/255/38355 --recursive
> 2020-07-27 17:48 50584342
>
> s3://upvid/255/38355/juz_nie_
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:07:49PM +0300, Tadas wrote:
> Hello,
> we face like 75-100 ms while doing 600 chunked PUT's.
> while 40-45ms while doing 1k normal PUT's.
> (Even amount of PUT's lowers on chunked PUT way)
>
> We tried civetweb and beast. Nothing changes.
How close is your test running t
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 12:59:10PM +0300, Tadas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have strange issues with radosgw:
> When trying to PUT object with “transfer-encoding: chunked”, I can see high
> request latencies.
> When trying to PUT the same object as non-chunked – latency is much lower,
> and also reque
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 04:32:45PM +, Arash Shams wrote:
> Hi everybody
> Im using Nginx in front of radosgw and I generate the request id header on
> nginx can I pass the same value to radosgw and tell it use this header
> instead of generating a new one ?
>
> nginx sample :
>
> more_set_i
31 matches
Mail list logo
