arate bucket, with
separate reservation/limitation/weight values. But so far as I
understand the text it doesn't work like that. I would love to be proven
wrong here :-)
--
Olaf Seibert
Site Reliability Engineer
SysEleven GmbH
Boxhagener Straße 80
10245 Berlin
T +49 30 233 2012 0
F +49
but which is about
balancing individual clients across all services?
--
Olaf Seibert
Site Reliability Engineer
SysEleven GmbH
Boxhagener Straße 80
10245 Berlin
T +49 30 233 2012 0
F +49 30 616 7555 0
https://www.syseleven.de
https://www.linkedin.com/company/syseleven-gmbh/
Current
- latency=1309.589843750s
Sep 09 10:24:43 ham1-000215 radosgw[2104175]: RGW-SYNC:meta: ERROR: failed to
fetch all metadata keys
Sep 09 10:24:43 ham1-000215 radosgw[2104175]: rgw rados thread: ERROR: failed
to run sync
Sep 09 10:24:43 ham1-000215 radosgw[2104175]: final shutdown
On 08.08.24 16:2
ackup)
syncing
full sync: 0/128 shards
incremental sync: 128/128 shards
3 shards are recovering
recovering shards: [30,36,39]
After that it took another hour or so until the rec
s about how we can find out what is causing this? It may
be that some customer has some job running every 24 hours, but that
shouldn't cause the replication to get stuck.
Thanks in advance,
--
Olaf Seibert
Site Reliability Engineer
SysEleven GmbH
Boxhagener Straße 80
10245 Berlin
T +49
dn't cause the replication to get stuck.
Thanks in advance,
--
Olaf Seibert
Site Reliability Engineer
SysEleven GmbH
Boxhagener Straße 80
10245 Berlin
T +49 30 233 2012 0
F +49 30 616 7555 0
https://www.syseleven.de
https://www.linkedin.com/company/syseleven-gmbh/
Current system status always at
