[ceph-users] Re: Reef 18.2.4 EL8 packages ?

2024-07-26 Thread Josh Durgin
We didn't want to stop building on Centos 8, but the way it went end of life and stopped doing any security updates forced our hand. See this thread for details [0]. Essentially this made even building and testing with Centos 8 infeasible, so we suggest users migrate to Centos 9 (so they continue

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph Squid released?

2024-04-29 Thread Josh Durgin
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 11:50 PM Alwin Antreich wrote: > Hi Robert, > > well it says it in the article. > > > The upcoming Squid release serves as a testament to how the Ceph project > > continues to deliver innovative features to users without compromising on > > quality. > > > I believe it is m

[ceph-users] Ceph Community Management Update

2024-04-16 Thread Josh Durgin
matters, please contact coun...@ceph.io and we’ll direct the matter to the appropriate people. Thanks, Neha Ojha, Dan van der Ster, Josh Durgin Ceph Executive Council ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph

[ceph-users] Re: Debian/bullseye build for reef

2023-08-21 Thread Josh Durgin
solved, and even then we have to > do both debian & ceph simultaneously That's an uncomfortable situation > in several ways... > > On 21/08/2023 15:25, Josh Durgin wrote: > > There was difficulty building on bullseye due to the older version of GCC > available: htt

[ceph-users] Re: Debian/bullseye build for reef

2023-08-21 Thread Josh Durgin
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61845 On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 7:50 AM Matthew Darwin wrote: > Thanks for the link to the issue. Any reason it wasn't added to the > release notes (for bullseye). > > I am also waiting for this to be available to start testing. > On 2023-08-21 10:25, Josh Du

[ceph-users] Re: Debian/bullseye build for reef

2023-08-21 Thread Josh Durgin
There was difficulty building on bullseye due to the older version of GCC available: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61845 On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 3:01 AM Chris Palmer wrote: > I'd like to try reef, but we are on debian 11 (bullseye). > In the ceph repos, there is debian-quincy/bullseye and > de

[ceph-users] Re: Reef release candidate - v18.1.2

2023-07-12 Thread Josh Durgin
Thanks for the report - this is being fixed in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/52343 On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:53 PM Stefan Kooman wrote: > On 7/12/23 23:21, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Can you elaborate on how you installed cephadm? > > Add ceph repo (mirror): > cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph

[ceph-users] Re: pacific v16.2.1 (hot-fix) QE Validation status

2023-04-12 Thread Josh Durgin
smoke is all green on ubuntu as well, given the ceph-volume tests passed as well, it looks good to go. On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 8:41 AM Adam King wrote: > Obviously the issue installing EPEL makes the runs look pretty bad. But, > given the ubuntu based tests look alright, the EPEL stuff is likely

[ceph-users] naming the S release

2023-04-11 Thread Josh Durgin
With the Reef dev cycle closing, it's time to think about S and future releases. There are a bunch of options for S already, add a +1 or a new option to this etherpad, and we'll see what has the most votes next week: https://pad.ceph.com/p/s Josh ___

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.6 QE Validation status

2023-04-05 Thread Josh Durgin
The LRC upgraded with no problems, so this release is good to go! Josh On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 3:36 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Josh, the release is ready for your review and approval. > > Adam, can you please update the LRC upgrade to 17.2.6 RC? > > Thx > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 3:07 PM Yuri

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.11 pacific QE validation status

2023-01-24 Thread Josh Durgin
Looks good to go! On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:57 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Josh, this is ready for your final review/approval and publishing > > Release notes - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49839 > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 4:00 AM Venky Shankar wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:22

[ceph-users] Re: State of the Cephalopod

2022-11-03 Thread Josh Durgin
Here's a link since the attachment didn't come through: https://github.com/jdurgin/ceph.io/raw/wip-virtual-2022-slides/src/assets/pdfs/2022.11-state-of-the-cephalopod.pdf On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 8:44 AM Josh Durgin wrote: > > As mentioned at Ceph Virtual today, here are the

[ceph-users] State of the Cephalopod

2022-11-03 Thread Josh Durgin
As mentioned at Ceph Virtual today, here are the slides from the project update. The recording will be posted to the Ceph youtube channel later. Thanks to everyone contributing to and using Ceph, you make this all possible! Josh ___ ceph-users mailing l

[ceph-users] Red Hat’s Ceph team is moving to IBM

2022-10-04 Thread Josh Durgin
pushing the boundaries of storage! Ceph Executive Council Neha Ojha, Josh Durgin, Dan van der Ster [1] https://newsroom.ibm.com/2022-10-04-IBM-Redefines-Hybrid-Cloud-Application-and-Data-Storage-Adding-Red-Hat-Storage-to-IBM-Offerings ___ ceph-users

[ceph-users] Re: octopus v15.2.17 QE Validation status

2022-08-08 Thread Josh Durgin
Great, let's release the final octopus! On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 8:00 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Greg, > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/47236 was tested and merged. > > Josh, David, unless there are any objections, this is ready for publishing! > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 3:16 PM Gregory Farn

[ceph-users] Re: octopus v15.2.17 QE Validation status

2022-07-26 Thread Josh Durgin
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:33 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Still seeking approvals for: > > rados - Travis, Ernesto, Adam > rgw - Casey > fs, kcephfs, multimds - Venky, Patrick > ceph-ansible - Brad pls take a look > > Josh, upgrade/client-upgrade-nautilus-octopus failed, do we need to fix > it, pls

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.1 QE Validation status

2022-06-22 Thread Josh Durgin
On Wed., Jun. 22, 2022, 15:44 Yuri Weinstein, wrote: > > We did not get approvals for dashboard and rook, but we also did not get > disapproval :) > > Josh, David it's ready for publishing assuming you agree. > Sounds ready to me! > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 3:26 PM Neha Ojha wrote: > >> On Wed

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

2022-04-04 Thread Josh Durgin
Hi Venky and Ernesto, how are the mount fix and grafana container build looking? Josh On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 8:22 AM Venky Shankar wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 8:51 PM Venky Shankar wrote: > > > > Hi Yuri, > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 11:24 PM Yuri Weinstein > wrote: > > > > > > We me

[ceph-users] Quincy release candidate v17.1.0 is available

2022-02-25 Thread Josh Durgin
This is the first release candidate for Quincy. The final release is slated for the end of March. This release has been through large-scale testing thanks to several organizations, including Pawsey Supercomputing Centre, who allowed us to harden cephadm and the ceph dashboard on their 4000-OSD clu

[ceph-users] R release naming

2022-02-08 Thread Josh Durgin
Hi folks, As we near the end of the Quincy cycle, it's time to choose a name for the next release. This etherpad began a while ago, so there are some votes already, however we wanted to open it up for anyone who hasn't voted yet. Add your +1 to the name you prefer here, or add a new option:

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.7 pacific QE validation status, RC1 available for testing

2021-12-06 Thread Josh Durgin
On 12/6/21 12:49, Yuri Weinstein wrote: We merged 3 PRs on top of the RC1 tip: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44164 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44154 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44201 Assuming that Neha or other leads see any point to retest any suites, this is ready for publishi

[ceph-users] Re: towards a new ceph leadership team

2021-10-19 Thread Josh Durgin
On 10/15/21 08:53, Josh Durgin wrote: Hello folks, over the past few weeks the Ceph Leadership Team has been processing Sage's departure and figuring out how to run the project going forward. We all appreciate Sage's leadership over the past 17 years, and will dearly miss him. He did

[ceph-users] towards a new ceph leadership team

2021-10-15 Thread Josh Durgin
Hello folks, over the past few weeks the Ceph Leadership Team has been processing Sage's departure and figuring out how to run the project going forward. We all appreciate Sage's leadership over the past 17 years, and will dearly miss him. He did give us a bit of a trial run last year, with his l

[ceph-users] Re: A change in Ceph leadership...

2021-10-15 Thread Josh Durgin
Thanks so much Sage, it's difficult to put into words how much you've done over the years. You're always a beacon of the best aspects of open source - kindness, wisdom, transparency, and authenticity. So many folks have learned so much from you, and that's reflected in the vibrant Ceph community a

[ceph-users] Re: EC Backfill Observations

2021-04-21 Thread Josh Durgin
On 4/21/21 9:29 AM, Josh Baergen wrote: Hey Josh, Thanks for the info! With respect to reservations, it seems like an oversight that we don't reserve other shards for backfilling. We reserve all shards for recovery [0]. Very interesting that there is a reservation difference between backfill

[ceph-users] Re: EC Backfill Observations

2021-04-20 Thread Josh Durgin
Hey Josh, adding the dev list where you may get more input. Generally I think your analysis is correct about the current behavior. In particular if another copy of a shard is available, backfill or recovery will read from just that copy, not the rest of the OSDs. Otherwise, k shards must be rea

[ceph-users] Pacific release candidate v16.1.0 is out

2021-03-24 Thread Josh Durgin
There are just a couple remaining issues before the final release. Please test it out and report any bugs. The full release notes are in progress here [0]. Notable Changes --- * New ``bluestore_rocksdb_options_annex`` config parameter. Complements ``bluestore_rocksdb_options`` and

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph 14.2.17 ceph-mgr module issue

2021-03-12 Thread Josh Durgin
Thansk for the reports - sorry we missed this. It's safe to ignore the import error - it's for static type checking in python. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49762 We'll release this fix next week. Josh On 3/12/21 10:43 AM, Stefan Kooman wrote: On 3/12/21 6:18 PM, David Caro wrote: I got

[ceph-users] Re: Small RGW objects and RADOS 64KB minimun size

2021-02-16 Thread Josh Durgin
: this is great news and I look forward to using this once Pacific is released. Cheers On 16/02/2021 00:43, Josh Durgin wrote: Hello Loic! We have developed a strategy in pacific - reducing the min_alloc_size for HDD to 4KB by default. Igor Fedotov did a lot of investigation and benchmarking, a

[ceph-users] Re: Small RGW objects and RADOS 64KB minimun size

2021-02-15 Thread Josh Durgin
Hello Loic! We have developed a strategy in pacific - reducing the min_alloc_size for HDD to 4KB by default. Igor Fedotov did a lot of investigation and benchmarking, and came up with some improvements to bluestore [1][2] to make this change have little performance impact (it even increases pe

[ceph-users] v15.2.3 Octopus released

2020-05-29 Thread Josh Durgin
We’re happy to announce the availability of the third Octopus stable release series. This release mainly is a workaround for a potential OSD corruption in v15.2.2. We advise users to upgrade to v15.2.3 directly. For users running v15.2.2 please execute the following:: ceph config set osd blue

[ceph-users] Re: 15.2.2 bluestore issue

2020-05-28 Thread Josh Durgin
was a significant delay)? I'm glad the tempfix is being put into place in short-order, thank you for the expedient turnaround and understanding. On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 3:03 PM Josh Durgin <mailto:jdur...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi Paul, we're planning to release 15.2.

[ceph-users] Re: 15.2.2 bluestore issue

2020-05-28 Thread Josh Durgin
> Tel: +49 89 1896585 90 On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:18 PM Josh Durgin <mailto:jdur...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi folks, at this time we recommend pausing OSD upgrades to 15.2.2. There have been a couple reports of OSDs crashing due to rocksdb corruption after upgrading to 15.

[ceph-users] 15.2.2 bluestore issue

2020-05-20 Thread Josh Durgin
Hi folks, at this time we recommend pausing OSD upgrades to 15.2.2. There have been a couple reports of OSDs crashing due to rocksdb corruption after upgrading to 15.2.2 [1] [2]. It's safe to upgrade monitors and mgr, but OSDs and everything else should wait. We're investigating and will get a f