[ceph-users] Re: difference between rados ls and radosgw-admin bucket radoslist

My understanding is that radoslist is the same (or "very like") as rados ls, except that it limit the scope to the given bucket. to be confirmed, I don't want to spread false information, but when you do a radosgw-admin bucket check --check-objects --fix, it rebuild the "bi" from the pool leve

[ceph-users] Re: Files listed in radosgw BI but is not available in ceph

I have the exact opposite. Files can be listed (the are in the bucket index), but are not available anymore. Am Fr., 16. Juli 2021 um 18:41 Uhr schrieb Jean-Sebastien Landry : Hi Boris, I don't have any answer for you, but I have situation similar to yours. https://lists.ceph.io/hyper

[ceph-users] Re: Files listed in radosgw BI but is not available in ceph

Hi Boris, I don't have any answer for you, but I have situation similar to yours. https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@ceph.io/message/7E6O6ILGE5JCI4ISU66HZ6ZVZP6N6T3M/ I didn't try radoslist, I should have. Is this new, or it just that the client realised this lately? All the data

[ceph-users] reset user stats = (75) Value too large for defined data type

Hello ceph-users, does someone have an idea why I got this? $ radosgw-admin user stats --uid someone --reset-stats ERROR: could not reset user stats: (75) Value too large for defined data type ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To uns

[ceph-users] resharding and s3cmd empty listing

Hi everyone, something strange here with bucket resharding vs. bucket listing. I have a bucket with about 1M objects in it, I increased the bucket quota from 1M to 2M, and manually resharded from 11 to 23. (dynamic resharding is disabled) Since then, the user can't list objects in some paths.

[ceph-users] Re: [Suspicious newsletter] RGW: Multiple Site does not sync olds data

Hi, I hit the same errors when doing multisite sync between luminous and octopus, but what I founded is that my sync errors was mainly on old multipart and shadow objects, at the "rados level" if I might say. (leftovers from luminous bugs) So check at the "user level", using s3cmd/awscli and t

[ceph-users] Re: rgw.none vs quota

Manuel & Konstantin, thank you to confirm this. I should upgrade to Nautilus in the next few weeks. I just live with it for now. Thanks! ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

[ceph-users] rgw.none vs quota

Hi everyone, a bucket was overquota, (default quota of 300k objects per bucket), I enabled the object quota for this bucket and set a quota of 600k objects. We are on Luminous (12.2.12) and dynamic resharding is disabled, I manually do the resharding from 3 to 6 shards. Since then, radosgw-ad

[ceph-users] Re: radosgw, public and private access on the same cluster ?

Hi Wido, yes I have and http proxy in between. Your right, bucket filtering on the proxy and ACL on the bucket will be simple enough, but I don't know if it will be good enough. I know it's far-fetched but, if, for whatever reason, the access/secret key are leaked, and I have a security issue o

[ceph-users] radosgw, public and private access on the same cluster ?

Hi everyone, we have a ceph cluster for object storage only, the rgws are accessible from the internet, and everything is ok. Now, one of our team/client required that their data should not ever be accessible from the internet. In any case of security bug/breach/whatever, they want to limit the