[ceph-users] Ceph performance problems

2023-03-22 Thread Dominik Baack
Hi, we are currently testing out ways to increase Ceph performance because what we experience so far is very close to unusable. For the test cluster we utilizing 4 nodes with the following hardware data: Dual 200GBe Mellanox Ethernet 2x EPYC Rome 7302 16x 32GB 3200MHz ECC 9x 15.36TB Micron 93

[ceph-users] Re: Change OSD Address after IB/Ethernet switch

2022-12-19 Thread Dominik Baack
eason, but try it manually and restart the OSD services. I didn't have to go through these steps in a while (with cephadm only once in a test cluster), not sure what we could be missing here. Zitat von Dominik Baack : Hi, OSD (9 SSDs) and Mons are currently on the same nodes with 2

[ceph-users] Re: Change OSD Address after IB/Ethernet switch

2022-12-19 Thread Dominik Baack
the public network you should modify both networks and restart OSD services. Zitat von Dominik Baack : Hi, Reconfiguration ceph orch daemon reconfig osd.28 Scheduled to reconfig osd.28 on host 'ml2rsn05' cephadm ['--image', &#

[ceph-users] Re: Change OSD Address after IB/Ethernet switch

2022-12-19 Thread Dominik Baack
Hi, Reconfiguration ceph orch daemon reconfig osd.28 Scheduled to reconfig osd.28 on host 'ml2rsn05' cephadm ['--image', 'quay.io/ceph/ceph@sha256:12a0a4f43413fd97a14a3d47a3451b2d2df50020835bb93db666209f3f77617a', 'deploy', '--fsid', '10489760-1723-11ec-8050-cb54d51756be', '--name', 'osd.2

[ceph-users] Re: Change OSD Address after IB/Ethernet switch

2022-12-19 Thread Dominik Baack
Am 19.12.2022 um 15:49 schrieb Dominik Baack: Hi, ceph.conf on the host as well as in "cephadm shell" are similar and have the correct IPs set. Entries for osd are not present. # minimal ceph.conf for 10489760 [global]     fsid = 10489760     mon_host = [v2:129.217.31.186

[ceph-users] Re: Change OSD Address after IB/Ethernet switch

2022-12-19 Thread Dominik Baack
effects in a test cluster. Regards, Eugen [1] https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@ceph.io/thread/OWSIXB5O3Y7LXC3D2JYETEAFMRC3K7OY/ Zitat von Dominik Baack : Hi, min_mon_release 17 (quincy) election_strategy: 1 0: [v2:129.217.31.189:3300/0,v1:129.217.31.189:6789/0] mon.ml2rsn0

[ceph-users] Re: Change OSD Address after IB/Ethernet switch

2022-12-19 Thread Dominik Baack
after restarting of ceph.target. Cheers Dominik Am 19.12.2022 um 09:24 schrieb Eugen Block: If you did it "the right way" then 'ceph mon dump' should reflect the changes. Does that output show the new IP addresses? Zitat von Dominik Baack : Hi, I removed/added the new mons

[ceph-users] Re: Change OSD Address after IB/Ethernet switch

2022-12-17 Thread Dominik Baack
/rados/operations/add-or-rm-mons/#changing-a-monitor-s-ip-address-the-messy-way Cheers Dominik Baack Am 17.12.2022 um 10:06 schrieb Eugen Block: Hi, did you also change the monmap as described in the docs [1]? There have been multiple threads in this list with the same topic. Simply changing

[ceph-users] Change OSD Address after IB/Ethernet switch

2022-12-16 Thread Dominik Baack
Hi, we have switched our network from IP over IB to an Ethernet configuration. I could move the mons over to the new address range and they connect into the cluster network. The OSD create more of a problem, even after setting public_network129.217.31.176/29 cluster_network 129.217.31.184/29

[ceph-users] Re: Can't remove MON of failed node

2022-07-21 Thread Dominik Baack
ked out. I hope this creates no further problems down the line when I want to reintegrate a new sn01 node. Thanks Dominik Am 21.07.2022 um 12:01 schrieb Robert Gallop: You try ceph orch daemon rm already? On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 3:58 AM Dominik Baack wrote: Hi, after removing a node fro

[ceph-users] Can't remove MON of failed node

2022-07-21 Thread Dominik Baack
4/4  8m ago 3M ml2rsn01;ml2rsn03;ml2rsn05;ml2rsn06;ml2rsn07 you can see that its still present somewhere. How can I remove the last error until we get a replacement? Cheers Dominik Baack ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users

[ceph-users] Re: Ignore Ethernet interface

2021-09-14 Thread Dominik Baack
Thank you very much for your response. For now, we do not use IPoIB. If I remember correctly bonding interfaces over two distinct protocols could be problematic, but I will look into it. Cheers Dominik Baack Am 13.09.2021 um 09:38 schrieb Robert Sander: Am 10.09.21 um 20:06 schrieb Dominik

[ceph-users] Ignore Ethernet interface

2021-09-10 Thread Dominik Baack
Hi, we are currently trying to deploy CephFS on 7 storage nodes connected by two infiniband ports and an ethernet port for external communication. For various reasons the network interfaces are mapped to the same IP range e.g. x.x.x.15y (eno1), x.x.x.17y (ib1), x.x.x.18y (ib2) with x constan