On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 9:13 PM Laura Flores wrote:
> The rados suite, upgrade suite, and powercycle are approved by RADOS.
>
> Failures are summarized here:
> https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/SQUID#Squid-1910
>
> @Ilya Dryomov , please see the upgrade/reef-x suite,
> which had this RB
The rados suite, upgrade suite, and powercycle are approved by RADOS.
Failures are summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/SQUID#Squid-1910
@Ilya Dryomov , please see the upgrade/reef-x suite,
which had this RBD failure:
- https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/63131 - TestMigr
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 8:41 PM Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 4:24 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> >
> > Details of this release are summarized here:
> >
> > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66756#note-1
> >
> > Release Notes - TBD
> > LRC upgrade - TBD
> >
> > (Reruns were not done yet
Could I be missing any significant features when using Ceph 16.2 instead
of 18.2 when using Docker/Swarm or LXC?
I am asking, because I am struggling to set it up in Version 18.2 due to
confusion with the debian 12 packages as some still stay in version 16.2
even after adding the sources for 1
This was common in the NFS days, and some Linux distribution deliberately slew
the execution time. find over an NFS mount was a sure-fire way to horque the
server. (e.g. Convex C1)
IMHO since the tool relies on a static index it isn't very useful, and I
routinely remove any variant from my sys
Hi - mostly as a note to future me and if anyone else looking for the same
issue...
I finally solved this a couple of months ago. No idea what is wrong with
Ceph but the root cause that was triggering this MDS issue was that I had
several workstations and a couple servers where the updatedb of "lo
After fixing the issues identified below we cherry-picked all PRs from this
list for 18.2.3 https://pad.ceph.com/p/release-cherry-pick-coordination.
The question to the dev leads: do you think we can proceed with the release
without rerunning suites, as they were already approved?
Please reply wi
Hi Venky,
On 02-07-2024 09:45, Venky Shankar wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 2:30 PM Stefan Kooman wrote:
Hi Dietmar,
On 29-06-2024 10:50, Dietmar Rieder wrote:
Hi all,
finally we were able to repair the filesystem and it seems that we did
not lose any data. Thanks for all sugges
crimson-rados approved.
Failure fixes were backported to `squid` branch.
Thanks,
Matan
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 5:23 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> Details of this release are summarized here:
>
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66756#note-1
>
> Release Notes - TBD
> LRC upgrade - TBD
>
> (Reruns wer
Hi Cephers,
These are the topics that we discussed in our meeting:
- [cbodley] rgw tech lead transitioning to Eric Ivancich and Adam Emerson
- You may send your congrats to them! (offline)
- [Zac] - last week's unfinished business -
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58092
- [Zac
Hi Stefan,
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 2:30 PM Stefan Kooman wrote:
>
> Hi Dietmar,
>
> On 29-06-2024 10:50, Dietmar Rieder wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > finally we were able to repair the filesystem and it seems that we did
> > not lose any data. Thanks for all suggestions and comments.
> >
> > Here is
11 matches
Mail list logo
