On 14-09-2023 03:27, Xiubo Li wrote:
< - snip -->
Hi Stefan,
Yeah, as I remembered before I have seen something like this only once
in the cephfs qa tests together with other issues, but I just thought it
wasn't the root cause so I didn't spent time on it.
Just went through the k
Which version do you use? Quincy has currently incorrect values for it's new IOPS scheduler, this will be fixed in the next release (hopefully soon). But there are workaround, please check the mailing list about this, I'm in a hurry so can't point directly to the correct post. Best regards, SakeOn
Hi,
We have HDD disks.
Today, after almost 36 hours, Rebuilding Data Resiliency is 58% and still going
on. The good thing is it is not stuck at 5%.
Does it take this long to complete rebuilding resiliency process whenever there
is a maintenance in the cluster?
___
Hello Laura
I have created the tracker and you can find it on
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62836
Please find the OSD map as below on the cluster
*root@cph2n1:/# ceph -s* cluster:
id: e5f5ec6e-0b1b-11ec-adc5-35a84c0db1fb
health: HEALTH_WARN
65 pgs not deep-scrubbed in t
On 9/13/23 20:58, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:20 AM Stefan Kooman wrote:
Hi,
Since the 6.5 kernel addressed the issue with regards to regression in
the readahead handling code... we went ahead and installed this kernel
for a couple of mail / web clusters (Ubuntu 6.5.1-060501
Link the tracker on this list if you have it. You can create one under the
RADOS project: https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados
Thanks,
Laura
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 4:35 PM Laura Flores wrote:
> Hi Mosharaf,
>
> Can you please create a tracker issue and attach a copy of your osdmap?
> Also,
Hmmm, I think I like this capacity card, much better than the one I am
currently using ;)
>
> We have some screenshots in a blog post we did a while back:
> https://ceph.io/en/news/blog/2023/landing-page/
> and also in the documentation:
> https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/mgr/dashboard/#overview-
Hi Mosharaf,
Can you please create a tracker issue and attach a copy of your osdmap?
Also, please include any other output that characterizes the slowdown in
client I/O operations you're noticing in your cluster. I can take a look
once I have that information,
Thanks,
Laura
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023
Hi,
As long as you see changes and "recovery" it will make progress so i guess you
have just to wait...
What kind of disks did you add?
Hth
Mehmet
Am 12. September 2023 20:37:56 MESZ schrieb sharathvuthp...@gmail.com:
>We have a user-provisioned instance( Bare Metal Installation) of OpenShift
On 12.09.23 14:51, hansen.r...@live.com.au wrote:
I have a ceph cluster running on my proxmox system and it all seemed to upgrade
successfully however after the reboot my ceph-mon and my ceph-osd services are
failing to start or are crashing by the looks of it.
You should ask that question o
We have a user-provisioned instance( Bare Metal Installation) of OpenShift
cluster running on version 4.12 and we are using OpenShift Data Foundation as
the Storage System. Earlier we had 3 disks attached to the storage system and 3
OSDs were available in the cluster. Today, while adding additio
Hi There,
I have a ceph cluster running on my proxmox system and it all seemed to upgrade
successfully however after the reboot my ceph-mon and my ceph-osd services are
failing to start or are crashing by the looks of it.
```
ceph version 17.2.6 (810db68029296377607028a6c6da1ec06f5a2b27) quincy
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 4:49 PM Stefan Kooman wrote:
>
> On 13-09-2023 14:58, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:20 AM Stefan Kooman wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Since the 6.5 kernel addressed the issue with regards to regression in
> >> the readahead handling code... we went ahe
On 13-09-2023 14:58, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:20 AM Stefan Kooman wrote:
Hi,
Since the 6.5 kernel addressed the issue with regards to regression in
the readahead handling code... we went ahead and installed this kernel
for a couple of mail / web clusters (Ubuntu 6.5.1-060
Hello,
We have a cluster with 21 nodes, each having 12 x 18TB, and 2 NVMe for db/wal.
We need to add more nodes.
The last time we did this, the PGs remained at 1024, so the number of PGs per
OSD decreased.
Currently, we are at 43 PGs per OSD.
Does auto-scaling work correctly in Ceph versio
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:20 AM Stefan Kooman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since the 6.5 kernel addressed the issue with regards to regression in
> the readahead handling code... we went ahead and installed this kernel
> for a couple of mail / web clusters (Ubuntu 6.5.1-060501-generic
> #202309020842 SMP PR
Hey Marc,
We have some screenshots in a blog post we did a while back:
https://ceph.io/en/news/blog/2023/landing-page/
and also in the documentation:
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/mgr/dashboard/#overview-of-the-dashboard-landing-page
Regards,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:59 PM Marc wrote:
> Scr
Screen captures please. Not everyone is installing the default ones.
>
> We are collecting these feedbacks. For a while we weren't focusing on the
> mobile view
> of the dashboard. If there are users using those, we'll look into it as
> well. Will let everyone know
> soon with the improvements in
Hi Martin,
it looks like you're using custom osd settings. Namely:
- bluestore_allocator set to bitmap (which is fine)
- bluestore_min_alloc_size set to 128K
The latter is apparently out-of-sync with bluefs_shared_alloc_size (set
to 64K by default). Which causes the assertion at some point du
Hello Folks
We've recently performed an upgrade on our Cephadm cluster, transitioning
from Ceph Quiency to Reef. However, following the manual implementation of
a read balancer in the Reef cluster, we've experienced a significant
slowdown in client I/O operations within the Ceph cluster, affecting
Hi,
I would try to finish the upgrade first and bring all daemons to the
same ceph version before trying any recovery. Was it a failed upgrade
attempt?
Can you please share 'ceph -s', 'ceph versions' and 'ceph orch upgrade
status'?
Zitat von Sasha BALLET :
Hi,
I'm struggling with a C
Hi,
Since the 6.5 kernel addressed the issue with regards to regression in
the readahead handling code... we went ahead and installed this kernel
for a couple of mail / web clusters (Ubuntu 6.5.1-060501-generic
#202309020842 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Sep 2 08:48:34 UTC 2023 x86_64
x86_64 x86_6
22 matches
Mail list logo
