Hello Jan,
I had the same on two cluster from nautlus to pacific.
On both it did help to fire
Ceph tell osd.* compact
If this had not help, i would go for a recreate of the osds...
Hth
Mehmet
Am 31. März 2023 10:56:42 MESZ schrieb j.kr...@profihost.ag:
>Hi,
>
>we have a very similar situati
Here goes:
# ceph -s
cluster:
id: e1327a10-8b8c-11ed-88b9-3cecef0e3946
health: HEALTH_OK
services:
mon: 5 daemons, quorum
bcgonen-a,bcgonen-b,bcgonen-c,bcgonen-r0h0,bcgonen-r0h1 (age 16h)
mgr: bcgonen-b.furndm(active, since 8d), standbys: bcgonen-a.qmmqxj
mds: 1/1 d
Need to know some more about your cluster...
Ceph -s
Ceph osd df tree
Replica or ec?
...
Perhaps this can give us some insight
Mehmet
Am 31. März 2023 18:08:38 MESZ schrieb Johan Hattne :
>Dear all;
>
>Up until a few hours ago, I had a seemingly normally-behaving cluster (Quincy,
>17.2.5) with
Hello, i've been running a 3 node proxmox cluster with 4 ceph osd for 3 years
as a production cluster.
As a test for trying to move ceph cluster network, i destroyed one of the 3
working monitors and tried to recreate it.
After destroying it, the new monitor refuses to join the cluster, even in t
hi,
how to understand ``Improvements in releases beginning with Nautilus 14.2.12
and Octopus 15.2.6 enable better utilization of arbitrary DB device sizes, and
the Pacific release brings experimental dynamic level support. `` in the
document
``https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/rados/configur
Hi,
we have a very similar situation. We updated from nautilus -> pacific (16.2.11)
and saw a rapid increase in the commit_latency and op_w_latency (>10s on some
OSDs) after a few hours. We also have nearly exclusive rbd workload.
After deleting old snapshots we saw an improvenent, and after re
Hi Peter, I would recommend from my experience to replace the Samsung Evo
SSDs, with Datacenter SSDs.
Regards, Joachim
Clyso GmbH - Ceph Foundation Member
schrieb am Do., 30. März 2023, 16:37:
> We encountered a Ceph failure where the system became unresp
Hi,
I am reading reading some documentation about mClock and have two questions.
First, about the IOPS. Are those IOPS disk IOPS or other kind of IOPS? And what
the assumption of those? (Like block size, sequential or random reads/writes)?
And the second question,
How mClock calculates its pro
Dear all;
Up until a few hours ago, I had a seemingly normally-behaving cluster
(Quincy, 17.2.5) with 36 OSDs, evenly distributed across 3 of its 6
nodes. The cluster is only used for CephFS and the only non-standard
configuration I can think of is that I had 2 active MDSs, but only 1
standb
Hi again,
something is very wrong with my hardware it seems and i'm slowly turning
insane.
I'm trying to debug why ceph has incredibly poor performance for us.
we've got
- 3 EPYC 7713 dual-cpu systems
- datacenter nvme drives (3GB/s top)
- 100G infiniband
ceph does 800MB/s read max,
CPU is i
Thank you so much Adam. I will check into the older release being used and
update the ticket.
Anantha
From: Adam King
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 5:46 AM
To: Adiga, Anantha
Cc: ceph-users@ceph.io
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] ceph orch ps mon, mgr, osd shows for
version, image and container id
I can see the json output for the osd you posted doesn't list any version
{
"style": "cephadm:v1",
"name": "osd.61",
"fsid": "8dbfcd81-fee3-49d2-ac0c-e988c8be7178",
"systemd_unit": ceph-8dbfcd81-fee3-49d2-ac0c-e988c8be7178@osd.61,
"enabled": true,
I have also seen unresponsive OSDs not being detected as "down". My best bet is
that the MON ping probes are handled by a different thread or in a queue
different from the disk IO queue, which means that "OSD responding to ping
probe" does not mean "OSD is making progress". The latter is what on
Sounds like all user have the problem?
so what I would do in my setup now:
- start a new rgw client with maximum logging (debug_rgw = 20) on a non
public port
- test against this endpoint and check logs
This might give you more insight.
Am Fr., 31. März 2023 um 09:36 Uhr schrieb Kamil Madac <
ka
Hi,
can you share more logs from the failing OSD? Something like
cephadm logs --name osd.4
Zitat von Lo Re Giuseppe :
Dear all,
On one of our clusters I started the upgrade process from 16.2.7 to 16.2.11.
Mon and mgr and crash processes were done easily/quickly, then at
the first attempt
> > OSD bench performs IOs at the objectstore level and the stats are
> > reported
> > based on the response from those transactions. It performs either
> > sequential
> > or random IOs (i.e. a random offset into an object) based on the
> > arguments
> > passed to it. IIRC if number of objects and
>
> OSD bench performs IOs at the objectstore level and the stats are
> reported
> based on the response from those transactions. It performs either
> sequential
> or random IOs (i.e. a random offset into an object) based on the
> arguments
> passed to it. IIRC if number of objects and object size
We checked s3cmd --debug and endpoint is ok (Working with existing buckets
works ok with same s3cmd config). From what I read, "max_buckets": 0 means
that there is no quota for the number of buckets. There are also users who
have "max_buckets": 1000, and those users have the same access_denied iss
18 matches
Mail list logo
