[ceph-users] RGW Multisite and cross zonegroup replication

2022-04-14 Thread Mark Selby
My company is proving out RGW Multisite (after a lot pre STS work) and we are trying out different topologies for a couple of different use cases. One of the things we are trying to do is replicate across one of our setups which involves a multi zonegroup setup. realm -> master   zonegro

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

2022-04-14 Thread David Galloway
For transparency and posterity's sake... I tried upgrading the LRC and the first two mgrs upgraded fine but reesi004 threw an error. Apr 14 22:54:36 reesi004 podman[2042265]: 2022-04-14 22:54:36.210874346 + UTC m=+0.138897862 container create 3991bea0a86f55679f9892b3fbceeef558dd1edad94eb

[ceph-users] df shows wrong size of cephfs share when a subdirectory is mounted

2022-04-14 Thread Ryan Taylor
Hello, I am using cephfs via Openstack Manila (Ussuri I think). The cephfs cluster is v14.2.22 and my client has kernel 4.18.0-348.20.1.el8_5.x86_64 I have a Manila share /volumes/_nogroup/55e46a89-31ff-4878-9e2a-81b4226c3cb2 that is 5000 GB in size. When I mount it the size is reported c

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

2022-04-14 Thread Neha Ojha
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 2:18 PM David Galloway wrote: > > Packages are still being written. I can upgrade the LRC tonight. Great! > > Being that Red Hat has the day off tomorrow, are we still planning on > releasing or should we wait until Monday? Let's hold off the final release until Monday.

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

2022-04-14 Thread David Galloway
Packages are still being written. I can upgrade the LRC tonight. Being that Red Hat has the day off tomorrow, are we still planning on releasing or should we wait until Monday? I can make either situation work. Just let me know. On 4/14/22 15:59, Neha Ojha wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 12

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

2022-04-14 Thread Travis Nielsen
Rook is ready for Quincy, thanks! Travis On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 1:48 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > I am assuming approvals from Neha and Venky. > Still not sure if Sébastien Han approved rook. > > We are waiting for the last PR to be mergedhttps:// > github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45885 > > Then all (

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

2022-04-14 Thread Neha Ojha
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 12:48 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > I am assuming approvals from Neha and Venky. rados looks good! > Still not sure if Sébastien Han approved rook. > > We are waiting for the last PR to be > mergedhttps://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45885 I just merged it. > > Then all (a

[ceph-users] Re: Ceph Developer Summit - Reef

2022-04-14 Thread Mike Perez
Hi everyone, The recordings for RGW and Performance are now available: RGW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGqBYbjJk0M Performance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPasQV8zj9U On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:24 AM Mike Perez wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > The summit continues in five minutes with topic

[ceph-users] Re: Is it normal Ceph reports "Degraded data redundancy" in normal use?

2022-04-14 Thread Kai Stian Olstad
On 29.03.2022 14:56, Sandor Zeestraten wrote: I was wondering if you ever found out anything more about this issue. Unfortunately no, so I turned it off. I am running into similar degradation issues while running rados bench on a new 16.2.6 cluster. In our case it's with a replicated pool,

[ceph-users] Re: Cephadm + OpenStack Keystone Authentication

2022-04-14 Thread Marcus Bahn
Hello, okay I got the problem solved. On Ceph side: Don't use mgr in ceph config set ... command. I have two RGWs so I needed to set these commands twice. For example: `ceph config set client.rgw.name.host01.xxx rgw_keystone_url XXX` ... and then all these commands again for the second ho