Hi all,
I want to ask your opinion which Ceph deploy version is better: using
cephadm(docker) or installing from packages?
Cephadm brings lots of convenience: easy upgrade (which sometimes stucks
but still), easy add new OSDs, ability to make placement policies etc.
In contrary I seem to lo
Pls check Crucial MX500 2TB drive, i think it is a bit cheaper than Samsung 970
EVO, and it is reliable as well.
samuel
From: mhnx
Date: 2021-05-30 20:45
To: huxia...@horebdata.cn
CC: Anthony D'Atri; ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: SSD recommendations for RBD and VM's
Hello Samuel. Th
Hello Samuel. Thanks for the answer.
Yes the Intel S4510 series is a good choice but it's expensive.
I have 21 server and data distribution is quite well.
At power loss I don't think I'll lose data. All the VM's using same
image and the rest is cookie.
In this case I'm not sure I should spend extr
Reed,
I'd like to add to Sebastian's comments - the problem is probably rsync.
I inherited a smaller setup than you when I assumed my current
responsibilities - an XFS file system on a RAID and exported over NFS. The
backup process is based on RSnapshot, which is based on rsync over SSH, but
the
I've actually managed to get a little further with my problem.
As I've said before these servers are slightly distorted in config.
63 drives and only 48g if memory.
Once I create about 15-20 osds it continues to format the disks but won't
actually create the containers or start any service.
Wor
I would recommend Intel S4510 series, which has power loss protection (PLP).
If you do not care about PLP, lower-cost Samsung 870EVO and Crucial MX500
should also be OK (with separate DB/WAL on enterprise SSD with PLP)
Samuel
huxia...@horebdata.cn
From: by morphin
Date: 2021-05-30 02:48
T
