This is what happens with my cluster (Screenshots attached). At 10:11 I
turn on bluefs_buffered_io on all my OSDs and latency gets back but
throughput decreases.
I had these configs for all OSDs in recovery
osd-max-backfills 1
osd-recovery-max-active 1
osd-recovery-op-priority 1
Do you have any id
>> When replacing an osd, there will be no PG remapping, and backfill
>>> will restore the data on the new disk, right?
>>
>> That depends on how you decide to go through the replacement process.
>> Usually without your intervention (e.g. setting the appropriate OSD
>> flags) the remapping will
I think it's time to start pointing out the the 3/30/300 logic not really
holds any longer true post Octopus:
https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@ceph.io/message/CKRCB3HUR7UDRLHQGC7XXZPWCWNJSBNT/
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 00:09, Burkhard Linke <
burkhard.li...@computational.bio.uni-giesse
OK, cool!
Will try to reproduce this locally tomorrow...
Thanks,
Igor
On 11/26/2020 10:19 PM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
Those osds are intentionally out, yes. (They were drained to be replaced).
I have fixed 2 clusters' stats already with this method ... both had
up but out osds, and stopping
Those osds are intentionally out, yes. (They were drained to be replaced).
I have fixed 2 clusters' stats already with this method ... both had
up but out osds, and stopping the up/out osd fixed the stats.
I opened a tracker for this: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48385
-- dan
On Thu, Nov 26,
hmm... I would suggest some issues in OSD-MON communication.
The first question is whether this "broken" OSD set is constant or it
changes over time?
Does any of this OSD back the 'foo' PG?
Igor
On 11/26/2020 10:02 PM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
There are a couple gaps, yes: https://termbin
Sorry, I replied to the wrong email thread before, so reposting this:
I think it's time to start pointing out the the 3/30/300 logic not really
holds any longer true post Octopus:
https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@ceph.io/message/CKRCB3HUR7UDRLHQGC7XXZPWCWNJSBNT/
Although I suppose i
Also wondering if you have the same "gap" OSDs at different cluster(s)
which show stats improperly?
On 11/26/2020 10:08 PM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
Hey that's it!
I stopped the up but out OSDs (100 and 177), and now the stats are correct!
# ceph df
RAW STORAGE:
CLASS SIZEAVA
Were they intentionally marked as 'out' or this was caused for unknown
reasons?
On 11/26/2020 10:08 PM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
Hey that's it!
I stopped the up but out OSDs (100 and 177), and now the stats are correct!
# ceph df
RAW STORAGE:
CLASS SIZEAVAIL USED
Hey that's it!
I stopped the up but out OSDs (100 and 177), and now the stats are correct!
# ceph df
RAW STORAGE:
CLASS SIZEAVAIL USEDRAW USED %RAW USED
hdd 5.5 PiB 1.2 PiB 4.3 PiB 4.3 PiB 78.62
TOTAL 5.5 PiB 1.2 PiB
There are a couple gaps, yes: https://termbin.com/9mx1
What should I do?
-- dan
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 7:52 PM Igor Fedotov wrote:
>
> Does "ceph osd df tree" show stats properly (I mean there are no evident
> gaps like unexpected zero values) for all the daemons?
>
>
> > 1. Anyway, I found so
Does "ceph osd df tree" show stats properly (I mean there are no evident
gaps like unexpected zero values) for all the daemons?
1. Anyway, I found something weird...
I created a new 1-PG pool "foo" on a different cluster and wrote some
data to it.
The stored and used are equal.
Thu 26 Nov 1
0. OK, not sure this is informative:
2020-11-26 19:40:01.726 7fd10d09b700 20
bluestore(/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-252) statfs
store_statfs(0x1839137/0x227b0/0x7470280, data
0x5c0ef8b8393/0x5c14998, compress 0x0/0x0/0x0, omap 0x9163, meta
0x227af6e9d)
2020-11-26 19:40:02.078 7fd0fe87e70
Hi,
> > When replacing an osd, there will be no PG remapping, and backfill
> > will restore the data on the new disk, right?
>
> That depends on how you decide to go through the replacement process.
> Usually without your intervention (e.g. setting the appropriate OSD
> flags) the remapping will
For specific BlueStore instance you can learn relevant statfs output by
setting debug_bluestore to 20 and leaving OSD for 5-10 seconds (or may
be a couple of minutes - don't remember exact statsfs poll period ).
Then grep osd log for "statfs" and/or "pool_statfs" and get the output
formatted
Here's a different cluster we upgraded luminous -> nautilus in October:
2020-10-14 13:22:51.860 7f78e3d20a80 0 ceph version 14.2.11
(f7fdb2f52131f54b891a2ec99d8205561242cdaf) nautilus (stable), process
ceph-osd, pid 119714
...
2020-10-14 13:27:50.368 7f78e3d20a80 1
bluestore(/var/lib/ceph/osd/ce
Hi Igor,
No BLUESTORE_LEGACY_STATFS warning, and
bluestore_warn_on_legacy_statfs is the default true on this (and all)
clusters.
I'm quite sure we did the statfs conversion during one of the recent
upgrades (I forget which one exactly).
# ceph tell osd.* config get bluestore_warn_on_legacy_statfs
Also you don’t need to create the volume groups and logical volumes
for the OSDs, ceph-volume can do that for you and handles raw disks,
too. Check out the man page for all the options:
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/man/8/ceph-volume/
Zitat von Richard Thornton :
Hi,
Sorry to bother you
Hi Dan
don't you have BLUESTORE_LEGACY_STATFS alert raised (might be silenced
by bluestore_warn_on_legacy_statfs param) for the older cluster?
Thanks,
Igor
On 11/26/2020 7:29 PM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
Hi,
Depending on which cluster I look at (all running v14.2.11), the
bytes_used is re
Hi,
I am currently evaluating ceph and stumbled across an odd issue when an osd
comes back online.
The osd was taken offline, but is still "in" and is brought back online before
it is marked "out".
As a test I run a fio job with 4k rand I/O on a 10G rbd volume during the OSD
down and up proced
Hi,
Depending on which cluster I look at (all running v14.2.11), the
bytes_used is reporting raw space or stored bytes variably.
Here's a 7 year old cluster:
# ceph df -f json | jq .pools[0]
{
"name": "volumes",
"id": 4,
"stats": {
"stored": 1229308190855881,
"objects": 294401604,
Hi,
On 11/26/20 12:45 PM, Richard Thornton wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to bother you all.
It’s a home server setup.
Three nodes (ODROID-H2+ with 32GB RAM and dual 2.5Gbit NICs), two 14TB
7200rpm SATA drives and an Optane 118GB NVMe in each node (OS boots from
eMMC).
*snipsnap*
Is there a rough Ceph
Hi Jukka,
In my case, public Swif buckets are working as exprcted for RGW
Nautilus 14.2.12-14.2.14 with OpenStack Rocky. However, Octopus 15.2.5
which should have this fix according to the change log, still fails.
Do you have anything interesting in rgw debug log (debug rgw = 20) or
in keystone lo
Hi,
Thank you Eugen for pointing it out. Yes, OSDs are deployed by
cephadm with drive_group. It seems that the orch module simplifies
the process to make it easier for users.
yes it does, you can also manage your OSDs via dashboard which makes
it also easier for some users.
When replacing
Hi,
I have k8s cephfs-provisioner.yaml and storageclass.yaml:
---
kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: cephfs
namespace: cephfs
provisioner: ceph.com/cephfs
parameters:
monitors: 10.32.121.51:6789,10.32.121.52:6789,10.32.121.53:6789
adminId: admin
adminSecret
Hi,
Sorry to bother you all.
It’s a home server setup.
Three nodes (ODROID-H2+ with 32GB RAM and dual 2.5Gbit NICs), two 14TB
7200rpm SATA drives and an Optane 118GB NVMe in each node (OS boots from
eMMC).
Only CephFS, I'm anticipating having 50-200K files when the 50TB (4+2 EC)
is full.
I'm t
Hi Eric,
Thank you to pickup my question.
Correct me if I'm wrong please regarding sharding and indexes.
The flow when the user put an object to the cluster, it will create 1 object in
the index pool that will hold the let's say location of the file in the data
pool.
1 index entry is for 1 bucke
Hi Robert,
This sounds very much like a big problem we had 2 weeks back.
https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@ceph.io/thread/EWPPEMPAJQT6GGYSHM7GIM3BZWS2PSUY/
Are you running EC? Which version are you running? It would fit our narrative
if you use EC and recently updated to 14.2.11+
28 matches
Mail list logo
