[ceph-users] When do I need to update my GPS maps?

I am a traveler and using GPS technology for finding the unknown locations or places. I am using this technology from the last three months, so I cannot say that I have complete knowledge about Garmin GPS technology. I know that I should update my Garmin GPS unit on a regular basis. I don’t know

[ceph-users] When do I need to update my GPS maps?

I am a traveler and using GPS technology for finding the unknown locations or places. I am using this technology from the last three months, so I cannot say that I have complete knowledge about Garmin GPS technology. I know that I should update my Garmin GPS unit on a regular basis. I don’t know

[ceph-users] When do I need to update my GPS maps?

I am a traveler and using GPS technology for finding the unknown locations or places. I am using this technology from the last three months, so I cannot say that I have complete knowledge about Garmin GPS technology. I know that I should update my Garmin GPS unit on a regular basis. I don’t know

[ceph-users] Re: RGW Lifecycle Processing and Promote Master Process

Hi Casey, Thanks for your reply. To confirm I understand you correctly, you are saying: - I want my Ceph multisite system to be in a state where lifecycle processing is running on sites/zones. - Using the "radosgw-admin lc reshard fix" on the non-master site to start this is OK? - It's a bug t

[ceph-users] pubsub RGW and OSD processes suddenly start using much more CPU

Hi all, I've got a 3-node cluster in a lab environment running on ceph version 14.2.9 (containerized). Each node is running a OSD, MON, MGR, MDS and 2 x RGW (we're using a second RGW instance to host a pubsub endpoint). I've been monitoring my nodes with the ceph dashboard, and noticed that al

[ceph-users] Re: radosgw beast access logs

We would very much appreciate having this backported to nautilus. Respectfully, *Wes Dillingham* w...@wesdillingham.com LinkedIn On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:02 AM Casey Bodley wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:33 PM Graham Allan wrote: > > > > Are

[ceph-users] Re: CEPH FS is always showing the status as creating

Have you created any MDS daemons? Can you paste "ceph status"? On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 11:52 AM Alokkumar Mahajan wrote: > > Hello, > We have created CEPH FS but it is always showing the status as creating. > > ceph fs get returns below output:- > > === > F

[ceph-users] CEPH FS is always showing the status as creating

Hello, We have created CEPH FS but it is always showing the status as creating. ceph fs get returns below output:- === Filesystem 'cephfs' (4) fs_name cephfs epoch 2865929 flags 12 created 2020-08-07 05:05:58.033824 modified2020-08-14 03:15:49.7

[ceph-users] Re: does ceph rgw has any option to limit bandwidth

> I wanna limit the traffic of specific buckets. Can haproxy, nginx or any > other proxy software deal with it ? Yes. I’ve seen it done. ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

[ceph-users] Remove Error - "Possible data damage: 2 pgs recovery_unfound"

Good afternoon! I have a small Ceph-cluster running with Proxmox, and after an update on one of the nodes and a reboot. So far so good. But after a couple of hours, I saw this: root@pve2:~# ceph health detail HEALTH_ERR 16/1101836 objects unfound (0.001%); Possible data damage: 2 pgs recovery

[ceph-users] Re: RGW Lifecycle Processing and Promote Master Process

On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 9:25 AM Alex Hussein-Kershaw wrote: > > Hi, > > I've previously discussed some issues I've had with the RGW lifecycle > processing. I've discovered that the root cause of my problem is that: > > * I'm running a multisite configuration > * Life cycle processing i

[ceph-users] Re: Convert existing rbd into a cinder volume

I map the images directly with rbd device map -t nbd nova/_disk because in this case my openstack instance has direct access to the public ceph network so it can map that image. But this is probably not usual? Zitat von "Stolte, Felix" : Hello fellow cephers, i know this is not the ope

[ceph-users] Re: 5 pgs inactive, 5 pgs incomplete

If Ceph consultants are reading this please feel free to contact me off list. We are seeking for someone who can help us of course we will pay. On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:50 PM Martin Palma wrote: > > After doing some research I suspect the problem is that during the > cluster was backfilling a

[ceph-users] Upgrade options and *request for comment

Hello Ceph Users, We have a Mimic 13.2.10 cluster on Ubuntu 16.04.03 with 6 servers, 36 OSDs. Each OSD has a 2GB memory target via ceph.conf (30 spin disks with HDD type and 2 pools on them (2copy and 3copy pools), 6 SSDs in a flash pool (3copy)) Our intention is to upgrade the code level of

[ceph-users] Convert existing rbd into a cinder volume

Hello fellow cephers, i know this is not the openstack mailing list, but since many of us are using ceph as a backend for openstack, maybe someone can help me out. I have a pool for rbds which are exported via iscsi to some bare metal windows servers and do snaphots on that rbds regulary. Now I

[ceph-users] Re: radosgw beast access logs [EXT]

On 19/08/2020 14:01, Casey Bodley wrote: Yes, this was implemented by Mark Kogan in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/33083 . It looks like it was backported to Octopus for 15.2.5 in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/45951. Is there interest in a nautilus backport too? I don't think we'd be ab

[ceph-users] Re: How to change the pg numbers

On 2020-08-19 04:05, norman wrote: > Hans, > > I made a big change in my staging cluster before, I set a pool pg_num > from 8 to 2048, it cased the cluster available for a long time :( I doubt it will have that big an effect this time. The change from 8 -> 2048 is way bigger than "just" a doublin

[ceph-users] Re: OSD takes more almost two hours to boot from Luminous -> Nautilus

yeah, this should work... On 8/19/2020 4:04 PM, Mark Schouten wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 03:55:17PM +0300, Igor Fedotov wrote: most probably you're suffering from a per-pool omap statistics update. Which is performed during the first start of an upgraded OSD. One can disable thi

[ceph-users] Re: OSD takes more almost two hours to boot from Luminous -> Nautilus

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 03:55:17PM +0300, Igor Fedotov wrote: >most probably you're suffering from a per-pool omap statistics update. >Which is performed during the first start of an upgraded OSD. One can >disable this behavior via 'bluestore_fsck_quick_fix_on_mount' flag. But >plea

[ceph-users] Re: radosgw beast access logs

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:33 PM Graham Allan wrote: > > Are there any plans to add access logs to the beast frontend, in the > same way we can get with civetweb? Increasing the "debug rgw" setting > really doesn't provide the same thing. > > Graham > -- > Graham Allan - g...@umn.edu > Associate Di

[ceph-users] Re: OSD takes more almost two hours to boot from Luminous -> Nautilus

Hi Mark, most probably you're suffering from a per-pool omap statistics update. Which is performed during the first start of an upgraded OSD. One can disable this behavior via 'bluestore_fsck_quick_fix_on_mount' flag. But please expect incomplete OMAP usage report if stats are not updated.

[ceph-users] OSD takes more almost two hours to boot from Luminous -> Nautilus

Hi, Last night I upgraded a Luminous cluster to Nautilus. All went well, but there was one sleep depriving issue I would like to prevent from happening next week while upgrading another cluster. Maybe you people can help me figure out what actually happened. So I upgraded the packages and res

[ceph-users] Re: does ceph rgw has any option to limit bandwidth

I know you can redirect to a 'different' backend configuration in haproxy based on url match. So maybe you can limit then this specific backend configuration. Ask these guys on help[1] they respond quite fast. [1] https://discourse.haproxy.org/ -Original Message- Cc: ceph-users Su

[ceph-users] Re: does ceph rgw has any option to limit bandwidth

I wanna limit the traffic of specific buckets. Can haproxy, nginx or any other proxy software deal with it ? Janne Johansson 于2020年8月19日周三 下午4:32写道： > Apart from Marc Roos' reply, it seems like something that could be easily > done with any normal kind of network rate limiting, so anything that

[ceph-users] Re: does ceph rgw has any option to limit bandwidth

Apart from Marc Roos' reply, it seems like something that could be easily done with any normal kind of network rate limiting, so anything that limits traffic that matches "outgoing tcp from self with source-port 80,443*" should work for your rgw too, if you think it eats too much BW, without limiti

[ceph-users] Re: does ceph rgw has any option to limit bandwidth

You cannot set that much in radosgw, for that you have to use eg haproxy https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/config-ref/ -Original Message- From: Zhenshi Zhou [mailto:deader...@gmail.com] Sent: woensdag 19 augustus 2020 10:16 To: ceph-users Subject: [ceph-users] does ceph rg

[ceph-users] does ceph rgw has any option to limit bandwidth

Hi, Is there any option of rados gateway that limit bandwidth? ___ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io