Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-21 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 04/20/2012 06:44 PM, Crunch wrote: > 1) Why if the original document was licensed with an "open commons" > license is the document being relicensed as an "open publication" license. they were not open commons originally, and i guess we just need to update things at our end to get in line ( and

Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-21 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 04/20/2012 10:24 PM, Crunch wrote: > I thought that might be. Thanks for clearing that up. The other > possibility was that a "new" license included some extra constraints but > I wasn't to sure if that was allowed. Instead of trying to find the > answer in the license itself, I thought it wo

Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-21 Thread Ed Heron
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 16:05 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > ... > But, most of it can be automated isnt it ? and the docs are only ever > updated once every 6 to 8 months. Its more of a case of someone taking > the task up, and spending the day or two needed to get to grips with > whats involved and

Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-21 Thread Paul R. (Crunch)
On 04/21/2012 12:05 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 04/20/2012 10:24 PM, Crunch wrote: >> I thought that might be. Thanks for clearing that up. The other >> possibility was that a "new" license included some extra constraints but >> I wasn't to sure if that was allowed. Instead of trying to find the

Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-21 Thread Paul R. (Crunch)
On 04/21/2012 06:39 PM, Paul R. (Crunch) wrote: > On 04/21/2012 12:05 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 04/20/2012 10:24 PM, Crunch wrote: >>> I thought that might be. Thanks for clearing that up. The other >>> possibility was that a "new" license included some extra constraints >>> but >>> I wasn't

Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-21 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 04/21/2012 10:52 PM, Paul R. (Crunch) wrote: > I do apologize but something occurred to me and I have deleted the file > from the share. The document breaks the license agreement in its current > form so distributing it is probably not a good idea. What should we do? > Send it to one person?

Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-21 Thread Ed Heron
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 23:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > ... > I'll setup a resource in .centos.org space that allows us ( and whoever > wants to join the effort ) the ability to collaborate and share files. > details in personal email, early on Monday morning > Some sort of revision control

Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-21 Thread Paul R. (Crunch)
On 04/21/2012 08:38 PM, Ed Heron wrote: > On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 23:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> ... >> I'll setup a resource in .centos.org space that allows us ( and whoever >> wants to join the effort ) the ability to collaborate and share files. >> details in personal email, early on Monda

Re: [CentOS-docs] http://www.centos.org/docs

2012-04-21 Thread Ed Heron
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 21:29 -0300, Paul R. (Crunch) wrote: > ...On 04/21/2012 08:38 PM, Ed Heron wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 23:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> ... > >> I'll setup a resource in .centos.org space that allows us ( and whoever > >> wants to join the effort ) the ability to c