On 05/12/2009 11:11 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Ed Heron wrote:
>
>> Has anybody had a chance to look at this?
>>
>
> Moving it up on my to-do list...
>
> When cloning the root partition need to add "H" to the rsync flags to
> preserve hard links. Don't think /boot uses hard links, but
On 05/12/2009 10:19 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:22, William L. Maltby
> wrote:
>
>> In my experience, most admins set this to the preferred
>> shell interpreter (csh, bash, ...).
>>
>
> /bin/sh is the standard path for the Bourne Shell.
No, it's no
From: "Phil Schaffner", Tuesday, May 12, 2009 2:11 PM
> Ed Heron wrote:
>> Has anybody had a chance to look at this?
>
> Moving it up on my to-do list...
Thanks.
> When cloning the root partition need to add "H" to the rsync flags to
> preserve hard links. Don't think /boot uses hard links,
Ed Heron wrote:
> Has anybody had a chance to look at this?
Moving it up on my to-do list...
When cloning the root partition need to add "H" to the rsync flags to
preserve hard links. Don't think /boot uses hard links, but wouldn't
hurt to use it there also. An often-recommended alternative
Hi,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:22, William L. Maltby
wrote:
> In my experience, most admins set this to the preferred
> shell interpreter (csh, bash, ...).
/bin/sh is the standard path for the Bourne Shell. If you change that
to the C shell or something else that is not compatible with the
Bourn
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 12:33 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:42 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> >>> For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.
> >> curious -- when coding under that criterion,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Vladislav Rastrusny
wrote:
> I didn't mean to start a holy war here! ;) Bash is also ok ;)
Yeah, let's not do it. Otherwise, someone would start C-shell bashing
soon... Are you listening, Evolution? :-D
Akemi
___
CentO
I didn't mean to start a holy war here! ;) Bash is also ok ;)
2009/5/12 R P Herrold :
> On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:42 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
>
For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.
>>> curious -- when cod
On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:42 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
>>> For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.
>> curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at:
>> /bin/sh
>> in my script's shebang ;)
> lrwxrw
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:42 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> > For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.
>
> curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at:
> /bin/sh
> in my script's shebang ;)
lrwxrwx
On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
> For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.
curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at:
/bin/sh
in my script's shebang ;)
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS-doc
>haven't yet, but will do so later today. And if nobody complains, hey,
>it probably is a good article :)
>
>Ralph
Either that or I've hit a target nobody is interested in...
OK. It's a great article and nobody has any suggestions or problems...
I'm batting 1000... yeah, that.
Thanks.
Ed Heron wrote:
> From: "Ed Heron", Tuesday, May 05, 2009 2:16 PM
> > My first draft of http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CentOS5ConvertToRAID is
> > complete.
> >
> > Please, give it a once or thrice over and let me know what you think.
> >
> > I didn't go into too much detail with some steps. If
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Okay. I'm waiting for comments here - php as a scripting language?
> Strange >:)
not at all -- have used it for years; did a LUG presentation
as well. It can live well in the inittab and run as a daemon
process for very rapid prototyping.
h
From: "Ed Heron", Tuesday, May 05, 2009 2:16 PM
> My first draft of http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CentOS5ConvertToRAID is
> complete.
>
> Please, give it a once or thrice over and let me know what you think.
>
> I didn't go into too much detail with some steps. If you think a
> specific
> ste
Cleber Souza wrote:
> I have tried to change my homepage but were not allowed. Could it be allowed?
> Username CleberSouza.
Try again.
Ralph
pgpqvECrrAGaw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.
I have tried to change my homepage but were not allowed. Could it be allowed?
Username CleberSouza.
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Mats Karlsson wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 23:11, Ralph Angenendt
>> wrote:
>> > Mats Karlsson wrote:
>> >> On 2009-04-29, Mats Kar
Yes, I agree ;)
The problem is that I am not familiar with this language ;)
2009/5/12 William L. Maltby :
>
> On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 15:23 +0400, Vladislav Rastrusny wrote:
>> 2009/5/12 Ralph Angenendt :
>>
>
>> > Okay. I'm waiting for comments here - php as a scripting language?
>> > Strange >:)
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
> Okay. I'm waiting for comments here - php as a scripting language?
> Strange >:)
>
Yes and No... to many of us it may seem odd, we all know that shell
scripting is faster and way more powerful than php. We also know that
one could accomplish the same thing in half th
Lalit Dhiri wrote:
...
> I could not get the Ethernet to work when I first installed 5.2 on
> the XPS M1530 so I chose to use the same route and made use of WiFi.
> I will try Ethernet with out making changes with 5.3 to see if things
> get going if not this is probably still the easiest route imho
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 15:23 +0400, Vladislav Rastrusny wrote:
> 2009/5/12 Ralph Angenendt :
>
> > Okay. I'm waiting for comments here - php as a scripting language?
> > Strange >:)
> Why strange ;) I think PHP is no worse than Perl. I think the choice
> of scripting language for tools is up to t
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 11:53:35 +0100
> From: n...@unixmail.co.uk
> To: centos-docs@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] XPS1530 Draft Comments Please
>
> The hardware looks very similar to the XPS M1330 here (other than you
> have the nVidia graphics
> I hate Webmin period. I like the scripted install though.
Period? What period? Education period? :) I think that depends on the
admin. Some like GUI tools, some don't. If I can do something faster
with GUI, I'll do that with GUI. I think "command-liners" and "GUI
lovers" are two opposite sides in
2009/5/12 Ralph Angenendt :
> Noted. That would fit under "Admin tricks and shell one-liners",
> wouldn't it?
Yes, I think this is the place because it is very simple and plain.
> Okay. I'm waiting for comments here - php as a scripting language?
> Strange >:)
Why strange ;) I think PHP is no wors
Timothy Lee wrote:
>> That should not be a major issue, we have a couple of VM's that can be
>> thrown together for this sort of a thing. If you want to go ahead and
>> send me your ssh key, I can get the vm setup and get you access on there.
>>
> OK, attached please find my SSH key.
Just on
Lalit Dhiri wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Would anyone with CentOS Wiki experience consider giving feedback on the
> state of my draft article at?
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Dell/XPS_M1530
>
> I will be adding info ref Nvidia graphics card driver, hard drive Load Cycle
> and hope t
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 23:04 +0400, Vladislav Rastrusny wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I was advised by the forum moderator to ask for contribution:
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=20223&forum=38&post_id=76546#forumpost76546
>
> My wiki login is VladislavRastrusny
>
> I would
Hi,
Vladislav Rastrusny wrote:
> I would like to contribute for Tips & Tricks section with a small
> automated script to install webmin repository data and webmin itself
> from here:
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=20223&forum=38&post_id=76546#forumpost76546
Noted.
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:09:19 -0400
> From: philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov
> To: centos-docs@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] XPS1530 Draft Comments Please
>
>>
>
> Looks pretty overall.
>
> Just a style comment - but I'd enclose things like lspci
29 matches
Mail list logo
