Re: [CentOS-docs] Cluster Suite Documentation

2009-04-22 Thread Mrugesh Karnik
On Tuesday 21 Apr 2009 13:41:03 Tim Verhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Mrugesh Karnik wrote: > > Is there room on the wiki for Cluster Suite documentation. Specifically, > > non- GUI based configuration and administration. If yes, I'd like to > > contribute documentation related

Re: [CentOS-docs] new page? - Virtualization/Install MS Windows XP as a CentOS5/Xen guest

2009-04-22 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Ed Heron wrote: > From: "Manuel Wolfshant", Tuesday, April 21, 2009 6:36 PM > >> No GUI is needed on the server. One only needs to make sure that >> virt-viewer can be used (which happens if your remote workstation has an >> X server + you install xorg-x11-xauth on

Re: [CentOS-docs] new page? - Virtualization/Install MS Windows XP as a CentOS5/Xen guest

2009-04-22 Thread Ed Heron
From: "Manuel Wolfshant", Tuesday, April 21, 2009 6:36 PM > No GUI is needed on the server. One only needs to make sure that > virt-viewer can be used (which happens if your remote workstation has an > X server + you install xorg-x11-xauth on the the server running Xen. ssh > X forwarding takes ca

Re: [CentOS-docs] Authorship and Attribution

2009-04-22 Thread Karanbir Singh
Marcus Moeller wrote: > In gerneral I take a look at the original author first, ask him to > accept my contribution or to allow me to edit and if he/she is > unavailable I am going to contact the one who last edited the page. > Works in most cases. That sounds like a reasonable workflow, do we the

Re: [CentOS-docs] Authorship and Attribution

2009-04-22 Thread Karanbir Singh
Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Attribution-Share-Alike pretty much says that you have to keep original > author in place when you reuse the content (or at least mention him), so > that won't contradict the license. Right, My point was also about 'locking away edits' from other members of the wiki. >>

Re: [CentOS-docs] Authorship and Attribution

2009-04-22 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Karanbir Singh wrote: > We also need to keep in mind through this conversation that the content > on the wiki is licensed under very liberal terms, lets not try and make > efforts to wall in edit rights or to contradict the license terms > themselves. Attribution-Share-Alike pretty much says th