Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

Akemi Yagi wrote: > One thing about this is when there is a dispute between/among > contributors. How would we "settle" the case? Who would make the > final decision? The dispute can happen within the Editorial Team as > well. Shoot the offenders. I think this should be a) either played out her

Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

> And even more important: Who wanted to be on the Editorial Team? Being > on it means that you are supposed to subscribe to *all* pages on the > wiki (meaning that you'll get a changelog diff for all changed pages via > mail). And it means that you should at least skim through those diffs to > see

Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: >> > n Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> b) While doing so I have changed the Guidelines page for the wiki. >> >> Please review that page and add to the "G

Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

Akemi Yagi wrote: > > n Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> b) While doing so I have changed the Guidelines page for the wiki. > >> Please review that page and add to the "Guidelines concerning Wiki > >> content" part: > >>

Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Tim Verhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > n Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> b) While doing so I have changed the Guidelines page for the wiki. >> Please review that page and add to the "Guidelines concerning Wiki >> co

Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

On 06/10/2008, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > ... which will hopefully be the last part. > > Sorry that it took that long, but I didn't have too much time on my > hands over the last two months or so. And even more important: Who wanted to be on the Editorial

Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

Tim Verhoeven wrote: > Sounds like a very good idea to remove the Frontpage from the general > EditGroup. Are there maybe any other pages we should remove from > general editing ? No idea. Probably the guidelines page :) Cheers, Ralph pgpDlTI2eH7kY.pgp Description: PGP signature __

Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

n Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > a) I have changed the account creation page: > . Please view that page > while logged out of wiki-m. Looks good. > b) While doing so I have changed the Guidelines page for t

Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

Ralph Angenendt wrote: > a) I have changed the account creation page: >. Please view that page >while logged out of wiki-m. Yes, I know that the attachment is missing (the attention sign). This will work on . Cheers, Ralp

[CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

... which will hopefully be the last part. Sorry that it took that long, but I didn't have too much time on my hands over the last two months or so. This is what should be the last stages of opening up the wiki: a) I have changed the account creation page:

Re: [CentOS-docs] Review and maintenance of the JavaOnCentOS article.

On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 05:34:16PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote: > >> I always welcome people who wish to help make our wiki better and >> up-to-date. The java page is referenced quite often not only in the >> forums but in all other channels. > >> You might w

Re: [CentOS-docs] Review and maintenance of the JavaOnCentOS article.

Johnny Wahnstroem wrote: > Hello everyone! > > In a CentOS forum thread[1], I was asked by forum member "AlanJBartlett" > if I would like to take on the care and feeding of the latter (section > 3?) part of the "JavaOnCentOS" article. Go ahead. Cheers, Ralph pgpc3EoqW0QiD.pgp Description: PG

Re: [CentOS-docs] Review and maintenance of the JavaOnCentOS article.

Reverting back to the main purpose of this conversation . . . Range, please give the OP, JohnnyWahnstroem, edit access to this page so that we may have it kept (along with orc_orc's care of the first section) fully maintained and thus remove what currently is a cause of requests for help in the fo

Re: [CentOS-docs] Review and maintenance of the JavaOnCentOS article.

R P Herrold wrote: > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote: > >> I have been wondering on this subject. Why not make the menu (info >> and other options) available to people who do not have edit rights? > > dunno for sure -- preventing 'lowhanging fruit' automated webbish > spamming comes to mind

Re: [CentOS-docs] Review and maintenance of the JavaOnCentOS article.

Akemi Yagi wrote: > I have been wondering on this subject. Why not make the menu (info > and other options) available to people who do not have edit rights? Removing that was done on purpose to give the people who aren't interested in editing "a cleaner wiki experience" (or something, ask dag).