Hi,
Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
either versions regarding the current status.
So, what is the current status of both versions? (like 60%)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailm
Heretic! You've caused a turbulence on the force. The Gods of Kobol won't
answer your requests anymore!!
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens <
mstev...@imt-systems.com> wrote:
> 2011/2/14 robert mena :
> > Hi,
> > Despite the mailing list and twi
That's a lovely story.
But if that applies to CentOS core team (i.e they do not want to receive
money) why don't use the money to hire more staff to do some of their tasks,
specially those that they haven't been able to do in the way they would like
them to be done.
But it seems that I am barking
Hi,
Since I was the one who created this topic (with different purpose) let me
suggest that after the 5.6/6.0 release consider a 'business model' for the
CentOS.
And by business model I mean take some time to:
a) Evaluate _if_ one or more paid staff would ease some of the taks that
must be done
Me too. Who cares if it comes out within the next 3 months. As long as they
keep releasing the security updates quickly I've given up on waiting
for new releases :(
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Machin, Greg <
greg.mac...@openpolytechnic.ac.nz> wrote:
> I'm happy to wait rather is works
making questions or expecting answers that actually helps.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 09:31 PM, robert mena wrote:
> > Me too. Who cares if it comes out within the next 3 months. As long as
> > they keep releasing the security updates quickly.
yeah but he wants to hear from the horse's mouth
Who knows what the guy really said when a reporter quotes something
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Saturday, March 05, 2011 05:07:10 am Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> > Can any of the CentOS team please comment on this?
>
>
Hi,
I have a web server which is randomly becoming unresponsive. I've checked
for hardware problems with no luck :
- no ethernet errors
- no disk errors
- no memory errors
So far I've managed to point the trouble at the web server since if I
restart httpd (apache) it comes back to normal.
This
Hi,
Anyone here using Nginx as alternative to apache in conjunction to php
scripts?
Care to share thoughts and caveats?
I am reading that it is a good alternative but do not know the real life
limitations, diferences to apache, which repo to fetch etc.
___
Ok. centos does not offer any newer than this.
got a better place to use?
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Robert mena wrote on Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:26:03 -0400:
>
> > php 5.2.10
>
> upgrade
>
> Kai
>
>
>
Hi,
Yes Centos-Testing.
I've been using for a while (1 year) with no problems.
The last ius package that I've used (5.2.15?) kept aborting without any good
reason.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> As John says: from where did you get it? Or is this from CentOS-testing?
>
I'll have a look at them again.
But even tough I think it is good to have updated php version this one has
been running for more than a year and these problems only started a few
weeks ago.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> The ius packages are fine, you shouldn't use an un
Hi,
I need to fit at least three NICs and I was looking for motherboard models
that contain 3 or 4 CPI (or PCI-e) slots and works with CentOS.
I had a problem in the past with some models that had a bug and did not work
well with linux (ok with windows) so that's way I am asking this here.
__
Hi Brunner,
I need four network interfaces. This can be in one or multiple cards.
The problem is just what you've described : lack of info regarding the
compatibility/stability of such card under CentOS.
And since some of those dual/quad cards cost more than the motherboard
itself I can't affor
Hi,
I lost my mdadm.conf (and /proc/mdadm shows nothing useful) and I'd like to
mount the filesystem again. So I've booted using rescue but I was wondering
if I can do a command like this safely (i.e without losing the data
previously stored).
mdadm -C /dev/md0 --level=raid0 --raid-devices=2 /de
d: no such file or
directory
Any ideas?
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Luciano Rocha wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:39:25AM -0400, robert mena wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I lost my mdadm.conf (and /proc/mdadm shows nothing useful) and I'd like
> to
> > moun
h the rescue does not supporting this filesystem type.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Luciano Rocha wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:24:23PM -0400, robert mena wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > it worked (kind of). Thanks.
> >
> > I was able to recreate (the all app
Dmesg shows (for example when I tried to mount /dev/md2)
ext4-fs: md2 : not marked OK to use with test code
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Luciano Rocha wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:38:51PM -0400, robert mena wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > I h
i've tried with no luck
the problem is that a back rsync probably caused this.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 1:04 PM, James Bensley wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: robert mena
> Date: 2009/12/31
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Lost mdadm.conf
> To: CentOS ma
the problem was with the rescue image. i've booted from a new disk with a
regular Os install and managed to mount the raid partitions.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:43 PM, robert mena wrote:
> Dmesg shows (for example when I tried to mount /dev/md2)
>
> ext4-fs: md2 : not marked
Hi,
I am trying to use drbd in my centos 5.4 but I keep getting errors.
When I try modprobe -v drbd I receive
insmod /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5PAE/extra/drbd/drbd.ko
FATAL: Error inserting drbd
(/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5PAE/extra/drbd/drbd.ko): Invalid module format.
The current (running) ke
Hi,
My backup server (B) has a /backup/home and I'd like to restore
/backup/home/userX to /home/userX in my server A
I am trying to do with in the server where I want to restore.
rsync -e ssh -avzp -R --exclude "*.journal"
backup_server:/backup/home/userX/ /home/userX
But it is creating a /home
Hi,
I've upgrade the kernel to the latest version (C5) and after the update the
drbd is not being loaded at reboot time.
My previous running kernel was 2.6.18-164.el5.
I've checked the /lib/modules/ and
/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el5/weak-updates/drbd82/drbd.ko ->
/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5/e
odule drbd
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:04 PM, robert mena
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've upgrade the kernel to the latest version (C5) and after the update
> the
> > drbd is not being loaded at reboot time.
&g
Hi,
I am trying to update a CentOS 4.4 but the yum update gives me error
messages
Setting up Update Process
Setting up repositories
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno
4] IOError:
Trying other mirror.
Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: update
Thanks. Somebody entered an incorrect information in /etc/yum.conf
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Robert mena wrote on Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:30:18 -0400:
>
> >
>
> Note the "?" at the end, you likely have a typo in your proxy config.
>
Hi,
I've noticed that Oracle is charging for the MySQL version that supports
InnoDB (http://www.mysql.com/products/). I could not find any other link
with direct confirmation of what is going to change for the existing
servers/versions and I was wondering if anybody has a more detailed info.
For
Hi,
I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production environment
for more than six months without any problem. I am wondering if/when we are
going to see a 5.2.14 version there and if the recently disclosure of a
5.1.6 security update affects the 5.2.10 that is in testing.
_
Thanks. I'll do it later tonight.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 11:54 AM, robert mena wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production
> > environment for more than six months wit
Hi,
I need to use PHP 5.2 in my Centos 5.X servers. I've been using the one
found in Testing for more than a year without problems but I feel that it is
not being updated in a while, specially with the security issues.
I found a post about this iuscommunity.org which maintains 5.2 and 5.3 rpm
pa
Hi,
I've installed Centos 5.5 (plus updates) in a machine with INTEL DP43BF
motherboard. In order to make Linux detect the PCIs I've added
the pci=assign-busses in my GRUB conf.
Everything runs fine but within less than 2 days of uptime the machine
simply freezes (black console no connectivity).
Hi John,
Regular realtek fast ethernet. Each one connected to a broadband modem (1
Mbps each) so I do not think this should be a bus saturation.
I do not think this is a thermal problem due to the lack of messages (I got
this problem in the past with a different machine and I got those
overheati
e bug?
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 1:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/27/10 9:09 PM, robert mena wrote:
> > Regular realtek fast ethernet.
>
> IMNSHO, realtek are pretty close to junk grade NICs. they have far too
> many variations with far too many weird bugs when used for any
> Try turning off the green features completely on the board.. Never
> allow the board to go to sleep, don't even let the board put the monitor
> into power saving mode..
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12/27/2010 4:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > On 12/27/10
Hi,
I am looking for dual or quad fast ethernet NICs that work with CentOS.
There is no need for high performance so regular fast/pci is ok.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
10:13 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/12/24 robert mena :
> > Hi,
> > I need to use PHP 5.2 in my Centos 5.X servers. I've been using the one
> > found in Testing for more than a year without problems but I feel that it
> is
> > not being updated in a while,
Hi,
I have two servers in a drbd primary/secondary setup. Everything was fine
until I had to reboot both servers.
The primary rebooted first, the secondary assumed fine, but when the (old
primary) server got back online it was unable to mount the drbd fs
complaining about the modules.
I've trie
So,
to go back to the topic what is the current status for 6.0? Will it happen
in June or July?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
I've been using the php packages from c5-testing without problems for a
while. What is preventing it to be part of the regular extras repository?
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:29 AM, TR wrote:
> On 18/02/2010 13:06, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >i've just started looking after a (virtual)
Hi,
Does it prevent you from accessing the machine with several of those
messages appearing ? Like it was re spawning ?
The same here without a clue?
Does the version of vtund is the same in both ends?
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Daniel Bruno <
danielbr...@projetofedora.org> wrote:
> Hel
Hi,
I could not find any reference if the version of apache compiled for centos
5.x has support for more than 256 clients in apache's maxclients.
If that is not the case how can I recompile the package with such support?
Regards.
___
CentOS mailing lis
41 matches
Mail list logo
