Re: [CentOS] sssd.conf file missing

2016-06-23 Thread l
ondition and messages listed in my initial e-mail > are still present. > > From: l...@avc.su [mailto:l...@avc.su] > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 8:34 AM > To: CentOS mailing list; Kaplan, Andrew H. > Subject: Re: [CentOS] sssd.conf file missing > > Hello Andrew. > > T

Re: [CentOS] sssd.conf file missing

2016-06-23 Thread l
> > I made the suggested changes to the sssd.conf file, and the results are the > same. > > Just to make sure my syntax is correct: > > The following section was added to the end of the file: > > [sssd] > debug_level = 4 > config_file_version = 2 > domains = compa

Re: [CentOS] [CENTOS ]IPTABLES - How Secure & Best Practice

2016-06-29 Thread l...@avc.su
Hello Leon. In addition to everything else mentioned in this thread, I'd recommend you a great book on the topic. "Attack Detection and Response with iptables, psad, and fwsnort by Michael Rash" It contains a really nice and detailed guide on iptables and most common attacks, nmap, psad and snor

RE: [CentOS] Re: SCSI bad block table display

2007-12-07 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 17:29 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > From: Scott Silva Sent: December 5, 2007 16:32 > > > > on 12/5/2007 4:21 PM Hugh E Cruickshank spake the following: > > > From: Ross S. W. Walker Sent: December 5, 2007 15:49 > > >> Google 'sdparam' > > >> > No, I am definitely thinkin

RE: [CentOS] Re: SCSI bad block table display

2007-12-07 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 15:44 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > From: Scott Silva Sent: December 5, 2007 15:09 > > > > on 12/5/2007 12:13 PM Hugh E Cruickshank spake the following: > > > > > Don't most modern drives cover up the bad blocks with controller > > logic and > > spare block substituti

Re: [CentOS] remote ssh to machine how display firefox

2007-12-10 Thread Brent L. Bates
s would be more secure than not being subjected to them. -- Brent L. Bates (UNIX Sys. Admin.) M.S. 912 Phone:(757) 865-1400, x204 NASA Langley Research CenterFAX:(757) 865-8177 Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 Email

Re: [CentOS] yum freezing when removing old kernel

2007-12-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:24 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > David Evennou wrote on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:37:20 -0500: > > > > ... It's not clear to me, though, why > they like to scroll down for hours for a two-sentence reply. Maybe they hope that non-relevant text is trimmed out so that "scroll dow

[CentOS] Dependency error for perl-Digest-Perl-MD5

2007-12-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I enabled rpmforge on a fresh install as per the centos wiki with priorities and attempted to execute 'yum install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5' and received the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 Loading "installonlyn" plugin Loading "priorities" plugin Setting up Install

RE: [CentOS] Dependency error for perl-Digest-Perl-MD5

2007-12-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I have good news for you. This is one time where its >OK to use CPAN!! We give you permission. > >-- >Mark Mark, Thanks for the advice. I noticed that Perl shows docs for Digest::MD5, would I be correct in assuming that this means its pre-installed? Thanks you, jlc _

Re: [CentOS] file or website upload scripts / programs and security protection

2007-12-14 Thread William L. Maltby
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 09:51 -0800, Robert - elists wrote: > Holiday Greetings! > > Um scenario is centos 4.5 standard apache webserver > > I have a client that is really struggling with website file upload concepts. > > Ive been googling for some scripts or other programs that allow uploadin

Re: [CentOS] file or website upload scripts / programs and security protection

2007-12-14 Thread William L. Maltby
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 16:00 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 09:51 -0800, Robert - elists wrote: > > P.S. Possibly of more interest: http://www.nvu.com/ HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos

Re: [CentOS] file or website upload scripts / programs and security protection

2007-12-14 Thread William L. Maltby
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 16:07 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 16:00 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 09:51 -0800, Robert - elists wrote: > > > > > P.S. Possibly of more interest: > > http://www.nvu.com/ > >

Re: [CentOS] Home Theater Thing

2007-12-17 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 04:45 -0800, Steven Vishoot wrote: > --- Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Chris Mauritz wrote: > > > > oops. > > > > > > > > > another one of those misguided emails. :-D Guided mismails? :-O ___ CentOS mailin

[CentOS] Torrent: reminder to use it folks!

2007-12-17 Thread William L. Maltby
Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the DVD. My normal dnld from a mirror travels appx. 600Mb/sec. I'll wait until most of the U.S. goes home before I give up and use the normal download though. Here's hoping... -- Bill _

Re: [CentOS] Torrent: reminder to use it folks!

2007-12-17 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 17:24 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Kenneth Porter wrote: > > --On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:10 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Well, there's so few going right now that I'm sh

Re: [CentOS] Torrent: reminder to use it folks!

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
etrically over the > sockets, sending and recieving data on all peer connections, this can > hammer a network connection, so most torrent clients have a feature to > bandwidth limit (I often choose a number around 60% of the pipe speed) I don't throttle mine unless I'm in a bi

Re: [CentOS] Re: Home Theater Thing

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:19 -0800, Scott Silva wrote: > on 12/17/2007 7:09 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] > spake the following: > > What is a VCR? > > > It is a tivo with a tape drive ;-P Virtual Confusion Reactor! Usually within a containment vessel constructed of locally available raw materials, thi

Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:20 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > I want to set up a multiple "mode" computer with four separate Centos > installations on it. The objective here is to have a "spare computer" that I > can boot up into any of four "modes" depending on what I'm swapping it in for > a > the mome

Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning

2007-12-18 Thread Brent L. Bates
are that didn't have adequate surge protection. -- Brent L. Bates (UNIX Sys. Admin.) M.S. 912 Phone:(757) 865-1400, x204 NASA Langley Research CenterFAX:(757) 865-8177 Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:

Re: [CentOS] Torrent: reminder to use it folks!

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 07:02 -0800, Benjamin Franz wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, William L. Maltby wrote: > > [...] > > > Both my systems are already up-to-date. I'm just getting the images for > > backup, new installs and to share via torrent. > > > >

Re: [CentOS] possible bug 5.1 - possibly more of a package issue

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 10:30 -0800, dnk wrote: > Hi there, not really sure if this is a bug, but more so rather a missing > file... > > I installed a fresh 5.1 copy very minimal - no desktop, etc. Now it > came up later that I would need a desktop on this install. So I was > going to just groupins

Re: [CentOS] possible bug 5.1 - possibly more of a package issue

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 10:30 -0800, dnk wrote: > CORRECTION, not "--whatprovides". Drop the dashes. -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Logging into Windows 2003 Active Directory

2007-12-18 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I have been searching the net for directions on rhel and centos 5(1) to log in to a windows domain and have found many examples, all different and none work for me. Is there a hint to some documentation anyone here knows of that actually works? Thanks! jlc ___

[CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
Well, yesterday my 5.1 and 4.6 systems could connect to torrent.centos.org OK. Today neither system can connect. I can ping, but that's all. No changes were made to the firewall during this time. Any tips on debugging this? I successfully http downloaded all the ISO images from various mirror

Re: [CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:06 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > Well, yesterday my 5.1 and 4.6 systems could connect to > > > > torrent.centos.org > > > > OK. Today neither system can connect. I can ping, but that's all. No > &

Re: [CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:06 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > Well, yesterday my 5.1 and 4.6 systems could connect to > > > > torrent.centos.org > > > > OK. Today neither system can connect. I can ping, but that's all. No > &

Re: [CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:46 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > I'm running a port scan right now. So far, http and rsync are the only > > porst found open. The torrent file show port 6969 - but I don't know for > > sure if that represent

Re: [CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 16:10 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:46 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > > > >> William L. Maltby wrote: > >> > >>> I'm running a port scan right now. So far, http

Re: [CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-18 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 16:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > as I said prematurely, it appears the tracker is down, HOWEVER... my > uTorrent (MS Windows based) client is nicely finding 107 peers using > distributed tracking techniques (which I don't fully understand) > > I'm getting wire speeds ju

Re: [CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-19 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 04:35 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: > > William L. Maltby wrote: > >> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:46 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > >> > >>> William L. Maltby wrote: > >>> > >>>> &g

Re: [CentOS] Torrent: reminder to use it folks!

2007-12-19 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:05 +, John Bowden wrote: > On Monday 17 December 2007 23:24:01 Johnny Hughes wrote: > > Kenneth Porter wrote: > > > --On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:10 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby" > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: [CentOS] Logging into Windows 2003 Active Directory

2007-12-19 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I would use the official samba documentation... > >http://samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/domain-member.html#ads-member > >Craig Thanks everyone, all of the reco's are enough to get me started! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.o

Re: [CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-19 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:06 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:37:17 -0500: > > > Anybody know how I can do the equivalent "distributed" for CentOS on 4.6 > > or 5.1? > > It's called DHT in utorrent and is indeed

Re: [CentOS] Torrent: reminder to use it folks!

2007-12-19 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 07:50 +1100, Les Bell wrote: > "William L. Maltby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > At 07:40 EST (+5 UTC?) with most of the U.S still asleep, I've 8 and 6 > peers connected and uploading for the 4.6 and 5.1 DVDs respectively.

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents (was: Can't connect to torrent tracker)

2007-12-19 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 00:32 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Kenneth Porter wrote on Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:08:56 -0800: > > > Perhaps the next CentOS torrents can add the appropriate records to take > > advantage of this? > > AFAIK, there is nothing special about it, nothing to add. A DHT aware > cli

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents

2007-12-20 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 18:20 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > Ah, yes. It sounds so simple. But I've been perusing the various > > references available (bittorrent ones are sparse - no man pages) and if > > I want to seed beginning with the ones I

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents (was: Can't connect to torrent tracker)

2007-12-20 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 00:32 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Kenneth Porter wrote on Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:08:56 -0800: > > > Perhaps the next CentOS torrents can add the appropriate records to take > > advantage of this? > > AFAIK, there is nothing special about it, nothing to add. A DHT aware > cli

Re: [CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-20 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 12:37 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:06 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:37:17 -0500: > > > > > Anybody know how I can do the equivalent "distributed" for CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-20 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 08:29 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 12:37 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:06 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > > William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:37:17 -0500: > > > > > > &g

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents (was: Can't connect to torrent tracker)

2007-12-20 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 17:43 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Rcpt-To: > > William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:51:39 -0500: > > > Ah, yes. It sounds so simple. But I've been perusing the various > > references available (bittor

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents

2007-12-20 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 10:34 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > >> when the CentOS tracker was down, I fired up uTorrent on a Windows box > >> w/ the 5.1 i386 dvd torrent, and it managed to find a few dozen peers > >> in a few minutes... > > Still blissful (ignorance is ...), hit me with a clue bat if

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents (was: Can't connect to torrent tracker)

2007-12-20 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 14:02 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > > Yep, it was what I wanted to do then either! :-{ s/was/wasn't/ > -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents (was: Can't connect to torrent tracker)

2007-12-20 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 19:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Rcpt-To: > > William L. Maltby wrote on Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:59:17 -0500: > > > AFAICT now, at lease an initial successful connection with a tracker, > > You mean for you own c

[CentOS] Console during Install of 5.1

2007-12-20 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Is it possible during install to open a console window and perform some simple tasks such as lspci and mount. If so what text file editor exists in this console? Thank you, jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents (was: Can't connect to torrent tracker)

2007-12-20 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 13:58 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:02 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just need to find a way to make sure that it can't find a conventional > > tracker to se

Re: [CentOS] SCSI bad block table display

2007-12-21 Thread William L. Maltby
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:02 +0200, Alexandru Chiscan wrote: > Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > Is there a utility available that will allow for the dump/display of > > the bad track table of a SCSI drive. We had this capability on SCO > > OSR5 but I have not been able to locate anythin

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents (was: Can't connect to torrent tracker)

2007-12-21 Thread William L. Maltby
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 17:32 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote on Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:02:47 -0500: > > > I just need to find a way to make sure that it can't find a conventional > > tracker to see if that parameter has the desired effect. > > But y

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents

2007-12-21 Thread William L. Maltby
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 13:03 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On Thursday, December 20, 2007 5:30 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> iptables -A OUTPUT -d torrent.centos.org -p tcp --dport 6969 -j DROP > > > > Thank

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS-5 Need Help With Serial Ports

2007-12-21 Thread William L. Maltby
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 16:03 -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: > I fixed the UART assignment for ttyS0 with > > # setserial /dev/ttyS0 UART 16550A > > and now my modem's TR signal is high as desired. My question, am I > condemned to manually editing the grub.conf file after every kernel update > or is

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents

2007-12-23 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 07:42 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 18:20 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > > William L. Maltby wrote: > > > Ah, yes. It sounds so simple. > > > ... In fact, the /usr/share/doc bitorrent files say I need to

Re: [CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-23 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 08:29 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 12:37 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:06 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > > William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:37:17 -0500: > > > > >

Re: [CentOS] Trackerless torrents (was: Can't connect to torrent tracker)

2007-12-23 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 07:59 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 00:32 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > Kenneth Porter wrote on Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:08:56 -0800: > > > > > Perhaps the next CentOS torrents can add the appropriate records to take

[CentOS] Creating a local repo

2007-12-23 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I have created a local repo, set its priority highest, and populated it with xen-3.1.0-1.i386.rpm and kernel-xen-2.6.18-3.1.0.i386.rpm yet when I do a yum list *xen* I don't see those rpm's? Can someone shed some light on this for me? Thanks! jlc ___

RE: [CentOS] Creating a local repo

2007-12-23 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>How about this wiki article? > >http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CreateLocalRepos So the ticket here is that the createrepo command has to be run each time files are added? That was my issue I suppose. Thanks, jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.or

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 21:59 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Dec 25 20:46:02 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: reset full speed USB device using > uhci_hcd and address 2 > Dec 25 20:46:02 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: reset full speed USB device using > uhci_hcd and address 2 > Dec 25 20:46:03 onlo kernel: sr 0:0

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 08:09 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 21:59 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > > Do an lsmod and see if you see sg, maybe sd_mod, scsi_mod, ide_cd. > > Look at /etc/modules.conf (I think t

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 08:43 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 08:09 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > William L. Maltby wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 21:59 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > > > > > First, do mount an

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 09:19 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 08:09 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > >> William L. Maltby wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 21:59 -0500, Robert M

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 09:45 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 09:19 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > > William L. Maltby wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 08:09 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > > > >> William L. Malt

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 10:03 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 09:19 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > >> William L. Maltby wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 08:09 -0500, Robert Moskowit

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 10:03 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > Do an lsmod and see if you see sg, maybe sd_mod, scsi_mod, ide_cd. > > Look at /etc/modules.conf (I think that's it - thngs changed in the last > > decade or so). > > > > > > > scsi_

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 11:11 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > Almost forgot. IIRC, usb devices are always scsi. My usb flash drives all appear as scsi. So we can be certain that you need a scsi stack of loadable modules similar to the ones on my system that I showed earlier. On my 4.x, the o

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 08:09 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 21:59 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > > Do an lsmod and see if you see sg, maybe sd_mod, scsi_mod, ide_cd. > > Look at /etc/modules.conf (I think that&

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 09:21 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 08:43 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > > > I'll go over to my 5.X and re-write a 5.1 DVD now. Done using cdrecord. Worked like a champ. cdrecord -v -dao This indicates that the GUI stuff

Re: [CentOS] Linux vs Windows Drivers

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 12:06 -0500, Bit wrote: > What is so fundamentally different about drivers in Linux and Windows? > > > Not knowing a great deal about how drivers really work in Linux or > Windows, I can only really conclude that either Microsoft never updates > the Windows kernel (at lea

Re: [CentOS] Linux vs Windows Drivers

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 12:48 -0500, Bit wrote: > > Thanks to both of you for the reply. Good information, but that still > doesn't really answer my question. I'm more interested in the technical > side of things. What I really want to understand boils down to this: > > Why is it that in Wind

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 12:14 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > They are all there. See below > > William L. Maltby wrote: > > > > Almost forgot. IIRC, usb devices are always scsi. My usb flash drives > > all appear as scsi. So we can be certain that you need a scsi st

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 13:16 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > > Aha! Saw your "Trouble ... River City" reply to Scott. Your giving away s/Your/you're/ I *hate* when I do that! > our age! ;-=) > -- Bill ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] BitTorrent

2007-12-26 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 14:38 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Any suggestion for a 'good' bittorrent client with Centos5.1? > I can't define "good" as I've not used anything else but rtorrent. But the one available from Rpmforge on my CentOS 5.1 has given me no real cause for complaint. With that

Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-27 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 07:49 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Steven Vishoot wrote: > > > This might sound a lot crazy, but it is worth a try. > > Try removing the module cd_rom and inserting that > > module again. Do a lsmod to see if the order has > > change and try using the usb cd_rom to burn

[CentOS] Xen Networking Issue with CentOS 5.1

2007-12-27 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Hi, I tried this post on the Xen list first with no answer. I have 4 machines and 3 of which (all different) have no network access when booted into Xen. I tried using Fedora Core 8 and it produced the same results. Is it normal for the virbr0 interface to take an arbitrary IP? How does it decid

Re: [CentOS] MOre on buring ISOs

2007-12-28 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 22:55 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > So right now I have installed k3b on this notebook. I am using my Storix > DVD/CDRW usb drive. I can read cds with it. I saw your correction in your later post. > > > Total size: 55 MB (05:32.48) = 24936 sectors > Lout start: 56 MB

Re: [CentOS] MOre on buring ISOs

2007-12-28 Thread William L. Maltby
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 00:51 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > So far, I have not been able to burn a CD. I get a message from cdrecord > about Read-only file system. Cannot open '/dev/scd0' So I am going to > ask help over on the DSL forum on what Knoppix magic I need... > > But this shows th

[CentOS] vnc server

2007-12-28 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I followed these instructions, http://egopoly.com/archives/2006/09/how_to_use_vnc.html to successfully connect to my centos 5.1 box. I assumed I could #chkconfig vncserver on to make this permananet but when I tried to #service vncserver start I got the message no desktop configured. Can anyone

[CentOS] xen dependencies

2007-12-28 Thread Joseph L. Casale
It appears that if I perform an install of CentOS 5.1 without changing *anything* in the options, then do a #yum groupinstall 'Virtualization' I can now get Xen to function in bridged mode (it has network connectivity). In lieu of this, can anyone shed some light on what dependency Xen has that

RE: [CentOS] Xen Networking Issue with CentOS 5.1

2007-12-29 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I disabled the virbr0 using virsh and now all my domainU's use xenbr0. Bart, How do you do this, I ran the command and attempted a few tries without any success? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis

RE: [CentOS] Xen Networking Issue with CentOS 5.1

2007-12-29 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I think, but don't know for a fact, that if you don't specify a bridge >interface in your config, you'll get a 'nat' address in your domU. I posted >about it in my blog: >http://yablog->gary.blogspot.com/2007/12/xen-what-i-learned-today.html -- >maybe that will get you on the right track? > >

RE: [CentOS] xen dependencies

2007-12-29 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Just install xen en kernel-xen. That should be sufficient. Possibly you >can add virsh,if it's not allready there. > >Groupinstall virtualization also installs the GUI-tools (and possibly >also a GUI). > >Cheers, > >Bart Yes, I follow this exact suggestion and can repeatedly produce the same resu

RE: [CentOS] Xen Networking Issue with CentOS 5.1

2007-12-29 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>No. I never experienced loss of networking in the Dom0. My guess is that your >bridge interface isn't configured correctly. There's a bunch of good >>documentation on how Xen uses the different network interfaces. >http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenNetworking helped me understand it better.

[CentOS] Xen 3.1 install and xen-libs

2007-12-29 Thread Joseph L. Casale
It appears that xen-libs-i386-3.0.3-41.el5.rpm is only compatible with xen 3.0.3. If I want to install 3.1, where do I find a compatible xen-libs rpm. What exactly is this for, there is no mention on the xen website of this requirement? Thanks! jlc __

Re: [CentOS] Can't connect to torrent tracker

2007-12-30 Thread William L. Maltby
On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 03:36 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > > That did shutdown the tracker, but it is back on-line now. > > > > FWIW, the tracker is offline again tonight. > > I'm seeing a few 100 DHT peers for each > CentOS-5.1-{i386|x86_64}-bin-DVD so the torrent is f

Re: [CentOS] ISO burning challenge -- pilgrims progress

2007-12-31 Thread William L. Maltby
It's to bad you couldn't continue the prior thread. Would have been better to have everything in one thread. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-December/091666.html On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 00:04 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > First the Storix drive works just fine under DSL 4.2.1 on

Re: [CentOS] Firewall frustration

2007-12-31 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 09:33 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Peter Farrell wrote: > > "Problem is I want a REAL router/firewall with little work." > > > > Run a smoothwall installtion and replace your CentOS install. > > > > http://www.smoothwall.org/ > > > well first challenge is my unit's USB

RE: [CentOS] Regd: CentOS 4.4 Installtion Screen Shots

2007-12-31 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 09:01 -0500, Stevens, Matthew wrote: > Here is a link that I found useful for installing CentOS 4.4 with > screenshots. Hope this will help you. > > http://www.howtoforge.com/perfect_setup_centos_4.4 > > Matthew > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail

Re: [CentOS] ISO burning challenge -- pilgrims progress

2007-12-31 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 12:16 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > William L. Maltby wrote: > > > > > Over with DSL, I learned that they DON'T use the form: dev=/dev/scd0, > but rather something like dev=0,0,1 where the 0,0,1 was learned via > cdrecord -sc

RE: [CentOS] Regd: CentOS 4.4 Installtion Screen Shots

2007-12-31 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 13:01 -0800, Steven Vishoot wrote: > --- "William L. Maltby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 09:01 -0500, Stevens, Matthew > > wrote: > > > Here is a link that I found useful for installing > > Ce

[CentOS] cron clarification

2008-01-01 Thread Joseph L. Casale
What is the ramifications to simply placing scripts in the /etc/cron.hourly directory as opposed to actually adding jobs via the crontab -e method? Is there any significance to using one method versus the other? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentO

RE: [CentOS] cron clarification

2008-01-01 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Traditional crontab entries do still work, if you really want to deal >with that, but it's harder to automate install/uninstalls. > >-- > >rgds >Stephen Thanks Stephen and Jim! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailm

Re: [CentOS] OT: How many watts do I need?

2008-01-02 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 17:24 -0800, MHR wrote: > On Jan 2, 2008 4:43 PM, Dennis Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I would say its plenty big enough. I ran for many years a amd 2600+ box > > with > > 2xhdd's 3 optical drives, neon on the case a couple of fans, 1gb ram and a > > couple of

Re: [CentOS] OT: How many watts do I need?

2008-01-02 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 22:02 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote: > > Different mobos may have different needs. I had a 300 watt that was > plenty for my Acer AK77-400 (MAx/N) but it consistently chocked when I > put the Epox 9KRAI-Pro in that case. The Epox manual recommend >= 350

Re: [CentOS] mounting & partitioning Seagate FreeAgent external HD

2008-01-02 Thread Barry L. Kline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim McGeary wrote: > I can see the device in my /proc/bus/usb/devices file, but fdisk -l > doesn't show it at all. I was trying to mount and partition it using > Webmin, but I can't figure out the device name I need to giv

Re: [CentOS] Random files in homedir gets deleted

2008-01-03 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 13:09 +0100, Christopher Thorjussen wrote: > On one of my systems I seem to loose a file or two from time to time. > Last night, one of my files (/home/online/sh/NattjobbPrivat.sh) was > deleted/removed/vanished. Another time it was /home/online/sh/daemon > that was deleted. >

[CentOS] System drops off network after a few minutes

2008-01-03 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I have an Intel SE7525RP2 motherboard with a Yukon Marvel (82541GB controller) NIC in it. After installing CentOS 5.1 it functions fine for some minutes then looses network connectivity. By coincidence, I was using the system to clean some HD's for another and had booted off Knoppix and noticed

RE: [CentOS] System drops off network after a few minutes

2008-01-03 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Hi Joseph, >When the network drops, how do you wake it up again? >That might lead us somewhere. >-- >Fajar Priyanto Given my limited Linux experience, I just reboot :) I know, not very helpful, sorry... jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http

RE: [CentOS] System drops off network after a few minutes

2008-01-03 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>if it literally drops in a few minutes, run wireshark and leave it >capturing all traffic on the LAN interface until it craps. then stop the >capture, and look at the last set of packets. John, I am sure I can stoke this up, but how do I analyze the traffic after? Its sitting idle when this happ

RE: [CentOS] System drops off network after a few minutes

2008-01-03 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>is this using DHCP or static IP ? DHCP >are there any events related to networking at the end of the `dmesg` >output right after it bonks ? Darn, never looked there (my bad). I will get it up again this weekend and attempt the wireshark dump and make sure I save the dmesg log. Thanks! jlc ___

RE: [CentOS] System drops off network after a few minutes

2008-01-04 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 23:41 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >is this using DHCP or static IP ? > > DHCP > > >are there any events related to networking at the end of the `dmesg` > >output right after it bonks ? > > Darn, never looked there (my bad). I will

RE: [CentOS] xen dependencies

2008-01-04 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>In your "broken" setup, do you have libvirt and/or bridge-utils? > > >--Tim Tim, Yes it does. I think I am seeing the issue reported in a previous errata regarding Bugzilla Bug 237667 in RHEL for a now released fix in the current Xen rpm available. I have this exact behavior, and after many di

RE: [CentOS] System drops off network after a few minutes

2008-01-05 Thread Joseph L. Casale
The system turned out to have a flaky motherboard. It's not worth fixing so I think I am just going to punt it:) Thanks for all the info, it was insightful and will help me in the future! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos

Re: [CentOS] Strange Problem with dm-0

2008-01-07 Thread William L. Maltby
> rc=28 (dev=dm-0 ino=280175) > > > Now, this tells me that dev dm-0 is out of space but, what is dm-0? On my system, ]# ls -l /dev/mapper total 0 brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 0 Dec 29 10:07 VolGroup00-LogVol00 brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 3 Dec 29 10:08 VolGroup01-Home01 brw-rw-

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >