On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:07:33AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> http://mirror.harvard.edu, not exactly an obscure mirror, and it times
> out.
Doesn't look to be a mirror.harvard.edu in DNS.
> >From yum -d9 update:
yum update runs instantly for me from NYC just now. Yum was working a
half-ho
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 01:06:15PM -0500, Dan Burkland wrote:
> I have been tasked with "fixing" one of our CentOS boxes by somehow
> downgrading the libgcc and gcc packages to a specific version (Required by
> the Oracle Grid Control client). Normally I'd just remove and reinstall
> the packages
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 03:17:10PM -0400, Bobby wrote:
> I recommend using VirtualBOX from Sun. Close to wire speed, no need to alter
> the kernel. Simple and flexible to use.
No need to alter the kernel for KVM either. VirtualBox formerly from Sun has
been gathering bugs since Oracle took over.
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:11:59PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Do you have some data to back this up ?
Yes. Search for my contributions to the VirtualBox forums and the VirtualBox
bug reporting system. Also check for what experiences others are reporting
there. I'm sure you'll agree it would b
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 04:30:16PM -0400, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> I am interested in doing a number of security ideas to the firewall,
> iptables, on my webserver. If you have a program you would suggest or
> believe iptables is the proper solution, please feel free to post that.
For a set of useful
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 07:12:59PM -0400, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> I have a server sitting right on the net and the constant barrage of 100s of
> Ips trying thousands of times at port 22 is insane.
You're quite sane. Anyone likely to hit your ssh at its new port is likely
to try port 22 first. So if
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:26:00PM -0700, Don Krause wrote:
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html
That's an excellent little program. It can take some mucking about to find
the invocation that will save a particular file or set of files, but it
often can get the job done. It's
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:57:22AM +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> And yes I'd suggest fetchmail scripted to do this (given it is a one
> off)
Or fetchmail plus procmail to get it to the proper place.
Whit
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:
>When I reboot from CentOS to xp, the display card driver of windows xp
>is broken.I guess if the display card is switched in the CentOS?
>How to let these two system use the same display card?
No change is made in the display card by an OS that will affect how the card
wo
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:21:49AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> In some cases I've tried to edit in the right values but as the machine
> came up it renamed all of the ifcfg-eth? files with a .bak extension and
> created new ones using dhcp.
Since you're bringing that up - I've seen it too - what
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:46:19PM +0530, Agnello George wrote:
>Have a question , Suppose i had a client tell me that he can access the
>web page but it takes long time to view the pages the website is a
>static website ( suppose this website does not server dynamic data or
>d
Hi,
We've got a fresh CentOS 5.4 box, and the only glitch so far is that
/etc/init.d/smb doesn't start smbd. It claims it does - shows "[ok]" - but
only nmbd ends up running. Even setting a higher debugging level in the smbd
flags, nothing logs or shows on the console as to why smbd is immediatly
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:21:51AM -0400, Ryan Manikowski wrote:
> Have you run 'testparm' to verify the samba configuration does not
> contain any errors that are preventing the smbd daemon from loading?
I had not. Doesn't seem to tell us anything:
# testparm
Load smb config files from /etc/sam
> Does 'service smb restart' work after the rest of the system is up
> enough to log in? If so, maybe some of the underlying network services
> aren't ready when it starts at bootup.
/etc/init.d/smb restart does not restart it. Shows an error on smb shutdown
(of course, since it's not running),
> Increase the debug level for smbd by adding -d N (N = 0 ... 10) to
> SMBDOPTIONS in /etc/sysconfig/samba, restart smbd.
That was the first thing I tried. Nothing got logged or reported to console
- at all. The nmbd logs showed up as requested, but for smbd, nada.
Thanks for the suggestion,
Wh
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:58:07AM -0400, Ryan Manikowski wrote:
> As your config appears to be clean and free of errors that would prevent
> smbd from starting have you...
>
> ...tried starting smbd from the command line NOT using the init scripts?
>
> Make sure nmbd is started first: nmbd -D
>
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:41:22AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> . /etc/init.d/functions
> daemon smbd -D
It also seems perfectly happy with just "smbd -D" to start it, after system
startup.
But the two lines above do not work when from /etc/rc.local. Haven't tried
t
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:58:07AM -0400, Ryan Manikowski wrote:
> Make sure nmbd is started first: nmbd -D
You know, that's not the order the init.d/smb file has it in:
start() {
KIND="SMB"
echo -n $"Starting $KIND services: "
daemon smbd $SMBDOPTIONS
RETVAL=$?
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:39:28PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> You know, that's not the order the init.d/smb file has it in:
... except that file matches the order of the stock Redhat file, which is
working fine for us on several other systems.
This is just strang
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:47:50PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> That looks like the stock init file - but it might be a good idea to run
> 'rpm -V samba' to see if everything is standard. Running the init
> script with 'sh -x' might give you a hint about what it is doing - or
> you'll have to
More data:
"service smb restart" - does NOT get smbd running (although shows "OK")
"sh /etc/init.d/smb restart" - DOES get smbd running
The "service" man page claims the only environment variables it passes are
LANG and TERM. But that can't be the key, since
"/etc/init.d/smb restart" - does NO
> Maybe try "rpm -V samba" to verify all the samba files. You get any
> output then you have problems.
I take it this output:
# rpm -V samba
S.5T c /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb
S.5T c /etc/samba/smbusers
...T c /etc/sysconfig/samba
merely shows that these are files that don't precisely m
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 03:50:20PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> not until you run the command as suggested much earlier...
>
> /usr/sbin/smbd -iF
>
> which will launch it iteractively and output everything to standard out
> - the console itself and then let us know what it says.
Hi Craig,
/usr/
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:49:33PM -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> The service scripts can check for lock files. Do you have any stale
> locks in /var/run/subsys?
Thanks Kwan.
If I remove /var/run/smbd.pid (and /var/run/nmbd.pid for that matter), the
init.d/smb file still fails to get smbd running pe
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 04:40:26PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> sounds like a hardware issue - have you run memtest86 on this computer?
No, haven't. My experience with hardware issues is that they rarely
introduce 100% repeatable software errors. This one is entirely consistent
in its behavior, an
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 04:44:20PM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> I should have added that there should be a core dump in
> /var/log/samba/cores/smbd which if you could analyze, would give you some
> hints
As you might expect at this point, that's a totally empty directory. The
lack of a core dump m
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 07:58:19PM -0400, Ryan Manikowski wrote:
> Tell them to join the debian-users list and see what kind of intelligent
> discussion goes on there. They will be back to Centos in a week. =)
Too true!
Whit
___
CentOS mailing list
Cen
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 04:55:29PM -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
> I would start by comparing the values of all the environment variables
> between running as /bin/sh and /bin/bash:
>
> env > bash_env.txt
> /bin/sh
> env > sh_env.txt
> exit
> diff bash_env.txt sh_env.txt
Jerry,
That's a good idea.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:17:10PM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> Have you looked in /var/log/messages for errors from smbd? I don't
> remember seeing that anywhere in your T/S list.
Yup. I've grepped all the logs. Nothing from smbd at all. I also enabled
kern and daemon logs, just in case those
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:04:36AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> By any chance did someone add smbd to xinetd?
>
> If so then xinetd has the port open and the smbd process will not bind.
Nope. Not sure that would explain why a slight difference in how it's
invoked, through the same init.d script,
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24:00AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> The only difference here 'should' be that explicitly running 'sh' will
> invoke your own shell aliases and search PATH to execute sh, where if
> you omit it you'll get the #!/bin/sh interpreter specified in the script
> itself. Is
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:54:26AM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> # sh -x
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:52:51PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> A suggestion: in the script, add
> env > /tmp/smb.env
>
> or whatever you want to call it. Then you can compare and contrast with
> your environment.
Good idea. I'll try it when the system's back up. Someone's hunting up a
repla
Do you know that it's going out with valid headers, a "legal" helo address,
and the like? Many mail systems will use these as reasons to reject
connections when they're wrong. In the case of bad helo values, often it
won't get as far as the spam filter, since that's sent through before the
message.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:39:53AM -0700, John Doe wrote:
> What's the return value?
> service smb start
> echo $?
# service smb start
Starting SMB services: [ OK ]
Starting NMB services:
# echo $?
0
# ps aux | grep mbd
root 2520 0.0 0.0 107732
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:52:31PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What shell does the script specify at the top and what is found following
> $PATH?
Here's from the console:
# echo $PATH
/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/home/OpenBase/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/u
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:49:16AM -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> My gut tells me it's not hardware but willing to take it :)
>
> Have you tried adding a "set -x" to the top of the the smb startup
> scripts? I didn't see any such output in your replies so far.
Here you go:
# ./smb start
+ '[' -f /e
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:36:30PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> Here's the path seen within the init.d/smb script (from an inserted echo
> $PATH > file):
>
> /sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin
And if I set that path in a console session, smbd still works when called
directly:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> What happens when you manually try to execute the above commands?
# /bin/bash -c 'ulimit -S -c 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 ; smbd -D'
Not sure what that might in theory do, but it works:
# ps aux | grep mbd | grep -v grep
root 7870 0.0
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:57:46PM +0530, Jatin Davey wrote:
> I have a linux box which has CentOS running in it. I logged into the box
> using root and wrote a script in the /home/proc_threads directory. saved
> the file and quit. I changed the file permissions such that any user
> could execu
to give some message as
to why ... but it doesn't.
I wonder if the more recent X version of Samba is likely to work better, or
of the breakage here is related to using smbpasswd?
Whit
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:21:28AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> We've got a fresh CentOS 5.4 box, a
Finally, a clue!
Upgraded from the stock smbd version from the 5.4 iso to 3.0.33-3.28.el5,
and now an error message makes it into /var/log/messages:
May 24 15:29:12 xyz smbd[2674]: [2010/05/24 15:29:12, 0]
lib/messages.c:message_init(132)
May 24 15:29:12 xyz smbd[2674]: ERROR: Failed to initi
t; but not
from "sh /etc/init.d/smb start" or "smbd -D"?
All ideas are welcome. I'm seeing with the Google that Samba has long been
fragile about this stuff - but haven't found the fix yet.
Whit
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:56:30PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> May
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:38:59PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> Wondering aloud: where the smbpasswd *data* files copied? If so how,
> exactly? And from what version of samba were the smbpasswd *data*
> created with? And are the permissions of the smbpasswd *data* what they
> should be? Just g
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:47:00PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> Was this file *copied* from the Redhat 5.4 system(s) or created fresh
> under CentOS?
If you mean /etc/init.d/smb, it's CentOS's version. The entire difference
between the two, just for the record, is:
# diff smb /etc/init.d/smb
10
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 06:05:34PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> where "smb" is RH's version and /etc/init.d/smb is Cent's. I can't quite
> imagine that a difference between overwriting or appending path.txt is at
> the root of what I'm seeing though.
Corr
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 06:09:40PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> Correction: that wasn't a virgin version of Cent's. More in a moment.
This gets more bizarre. To a virgin version of Cent's /etc/init.d/smb - it's
a perfect match:
# diff ./smb /etc/init.d/smb
#
That&#x
Hi Brian,
I've been all over the environment comparisons before, I think. The question
currently is:
What can be the difference between
"/home/smb restart" - which works, and
"/etc/init.d/smb restart" - which fails
when a diff between the two smb files shows no difference?
This is with both
Les,
At risk of clogging mail boxes, see below, and note this line in the middle:
open("/var/cache/samba/messages.tdb", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0600) = -1 EACCES
(Permission denied)
Now, if I copy that modified smb file elsewhere and run it, for one
difference output stops without returning to prompt a
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 06:23:02PM -0400, Todd Denniston wrote:
> I have not been following this thread closely, but perhaps Robert was
> pointing at SELINUX and the
> need to keep the SE permissions intact as you copy/edit the file.
>
> i.e. you may need to:
> A) restorecon /etc/init.d/smb and a
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:33:53PM -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
> Are you running with SELinux on?
Now there's a good question, it turns out. I'd assumed CentOS followed the
pattern of most distros in having it not be in strictest mode
out-of-the-box, but in /etc/selinux/config:
SELINUX=enforcing
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:55:12PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:33:53PM -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
>
> > Are you running with SELinux on?
You were right Jerry!
echo 0 > /selinux/enforce
and then /etc/init.d/smb restart works! Thank you much Jerry!
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:46:56PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I would have looked at selinux first for any "odd failure", but I thought it
> related to the process itself and couldn't see any way that the process would
> be
> different when started as "sh /etc/init.d/smb restart" than simply
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:52:58PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
> Selinux alerts are in /var/log/audit/audit.log
Thank you for that. Cryptic, but there it is.
> The problem is if smbd doesn't create the messages.tdb file then it
> won't have the selinux rights.
I don't follow you. What else coul
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:03:38PM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> If you look at it as the two different commands, then they may have different
> permissions, owners, contexts, etc...
>
> /bin/sh vs /etc/init.d/smb
>
> I am just logically guessing here but ...
Let me follow your logic here. So th
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:09:33PM -0500, Jay Leafey wrote:
> In your case, there should have been AVC errors showing up in the
> audit log related to smbd. Using restorecon to fix up the security
> context on the files in /etc/samba might have resolved the issue
> quickly... but I guess the tric
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 12:44:41PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> and, yes, it ran CP/M, 1.4, then later 2.2
With ZCPR?
Whit
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 04:33:05PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> It is officially (according to RH, AFAIK) NOT recommended to go up a full
> release by update. Subreleases are fine, but you want a clean install for
> a new release (that is, 4.x to 5.x).
Ah, so that's still the RH way! That's w
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:22:22PM +0100, James Bensley wrote:
> redundancy, connectivity etc...) only to have something fail the next
> day (so it really paid off!) and then nothing has broken since?...Just
> goes to show you never know!
>
> Also recently upgraded my personal Ubuntu server to a
> > 2010/6/9 Boris Epstein :
> >> I have no problem setting my upload limit ( upload_max_filesize ) to 1
> >> GB but for some reason 2 GB or above seems to be no go. Would anybody
> >> know why? Could it be one of the many 32-bit vs 64-bit issues?
Other PHP settings, like post_max_size, also can
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:15:04PM +0200, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> All I can say is that I created that repo to be able to deploy it at
> work and home :)
> I just wanted to share it,
Anyone here have long-term experience with MooseFS? Is it solidly reliable?
Thanks,
Whit
___
rpmforge has it. For instance
# yum list | grep rrd
...
rrdtool-devel.x86_64 1.4.3-3.el5.rfrpmforge
...
- Whit
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
Trying to follow the recipe at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Cacti_on_CentOS_4.x
Which has a bit of an update for 5.x, but no joy.
Anyone know what this from Cacti should suggest?
Data Query Debug Information
+ Running data query [9].
+ Found type = '6 '[script query].
+ Found data query
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 04:38:17PM -0400, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
>I don't have an exact answer for you but you may find this tutorial
>useful.
>http://docs.cslabs.clarkson.edu/wiki/Install_Cacti_on_CentOS_5
Thanks. That summarizes nicely the steps I've taken. It's a bit better put
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:41:06PM +0200, Detlef Peeters wrote:
> You can try Munin for this.
Thanks. Hadn't look at that. A lively project in current development -
always good. Can't find anything about whether it can specifically graph
separate CPU core use - guess I'll have to install it and s
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:55:10PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I happen to like OpenNMS (http://www.opennms.org) but it is considerably
> more complicated than cacti to set up.
Thanks. I don't mind complicated if the documentation is clear. Cacti is in
that fuzzy area where it's not quite simp
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:46:16PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> The big difference is that OpenNMS typically needs no agent or per-host
> configuration because it works with snmp and auto-discovery of most
> services - and it handles routers/switches as well has hosts.
Getting off my topic, bu
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:31:42AM -0700, John Doe wrote:
> You could just use PNP and a custom script...
> http://docs.pnp4nagios.org/
PNP looks like a great project, when it matures. Someday it will be the
obvious answer, once someone writes a Nagios plugin that captures per-core
CPU load rathe
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 02:28:51AM -0700, John Doe wrote:
> I was able to make some plugins without too much problems (even discovered
> perl in the process)...
Agreed, it's easy enough to write Nagios plugins. I've done that too.
> Then PNP will "automaticaly" plot these values... but yes, if
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:01:26AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> If have firewalling to protect from security issues, why not just run an
> older
> version of cacti?
Sensible suggestion. One, it's not obvious where to find an older version.
Two, hours of attempting to get cacti to work have led
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 04:07:57PM +0100, Simon Billis wrote:
> Take a look at ganglia - http://ganglia.sourceforge.net/
>
> This may do what you need.
It's what I've ended up going with. (Munin also looked promising - if I
could get the syntax right to modify its CPU test for individual cores,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:37:11AM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 17/06/2010 23:20, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> > - best complied from source, there are big dependency problems with the
> > available rpms
>
> I find that very hard to believe - to the extent that I don'
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 06:51:52PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> Very few packages are ever best compiled from source on an
> enterprise distro.
>
> What, specifically, is wrong with the 3.0.7 in EPEL?
Um, that "yum install ganglia" produces a long list of package conflicts
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:22:35PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> Is this vitriol really necessary? I installed ganglia; not a
> single conflict.
Why yes, John, it is. The fine man said outright he didn't believe my honest
account, accusing me of making something up when I was onl
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:10:29PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:01:02PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> >
> > That being said, it's trivial to recompile the F13 RPM for 3.1.2 for
> > centos-5.
>
> And that would be the proper route to go instead of buildi
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:19:46PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> I just tried a ganglia install from EPEL; absolutely no issues
> at all. Perhaps if you'd bother to actually document these
> conflicts one of us might be able to help. That is if we're
> still willing.
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:19:46PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> > > If there were a good CentOS build of 3.1.7 I'd happily use it. But getting
> > > stuff from EPEL, which is essentially Redhat testing, is as silly as
> > > mixing
> >
> > Uh, you've confused EPEL and Fedora apparently.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:29:32PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And as others have said, /home, and maybe /opt, should *always* be other
> drives, or at least other partitions
Kind of makes you wonder why RH's default install is to shove everything but
boot into one partition these days,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:28:36PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Fun fact: Postfix-2.3.3 has been released in August 2006. Think about that.
To be fair, RH/CentOS also ships with Sendmail-8.13.8, also from August 2006.
What
a golden month for mail daemons that was.
The door's wide open for some
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 03:20:13AM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> But you are still making repeated announcements about packages here - I
> dont want to see every repo or development unit out there posting emails
> here for feedback about every component they built.
Please keep things in perspec
> Jane Curry wrote:
> > I'd try Zenoss. I wrote a big paper comparing Nagios, OpenNMS and
> > Zenoss (
> > http://www.skills-1st.co.uk/papers/jane/open_source_mgmt_options.html )
Thanks for sharing that, Jane. Great paper.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:40:10AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Also Op
It's getting set from /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-eth, line 285 and
following - although I haven't traced out the logic it's using to begin to
say why it's coming to the wrong conclusion in your case.
Whit
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:57:13PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> I have a machine wi
On the other hand, which interface is listed in the /etc/sysconfig/network
file? Is it your desired default?
Whit
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:57:13PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> I have a machine with two net interfaces.
>
> it seems to always pick the wrong one (eth1) as the default route.
__
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:54:49AM -0400, Jim Perrin wrote:
> 2010/6/28 Tsuyoshi Nagata :
> > Your answer is just install MySQL5.1 from source code.(make install)
> That's a horrible idea. At least use the package management system so
> that dependencies can be tracked properly. Installing from s
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:25:59AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> On 6/25/2010 8:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote:
> > - VMware Server seems like it's EOL, even though vmware hasn't
> > specifically said so yet
>
> Given that there are known serious bugs in 2.0.2[*] and that release is
> now 8 months old,
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:58:45AM -0400, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Susan Day wrote:
> > Hi;
> > I've got MySQLdb installed (bridge to Python) and I can't figure out how to
> > upgrade it. I did a find and got these paths:
> >
> > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlch
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:49:21AM -0400, Jim Perrin wrote:
> It actually counts for probably 20-30% of all the support necessary on
> the irc channels with people trying to update php/mysql or similar
> from source.
A large part of that problem is that people are asking for support in the
wrong
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:06:43AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> I second the emotion on VBox, its a nice piece of work.
>
> Read the license carefully, however. Its no longer free for use as a
> server in a business environment, only free for 'personal' use. Larry
> needs a new boat.
They
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:48:48AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:49:21AM -0400, Jim Perrin wrote:
> >>
> > No, the fact that your ability to 'yum update' and have the right thing
> > happen is broken is a big problem regardless of who/where yo
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:58:14AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > That's why I always thoroughly log all stuff installed by hand, along with
> > extra configuration steps taken with RPM-installed items, and make sure the
> > log's someplace where the next person can find it. In our case we maintai
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 08:47:17AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
> > In my world I have two parts of the file system, one containing OS and
> > apps that runs short-name standard and the other where the user data
> > files are contained that uses long names and sometimes unicode
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 05:21:36PM -0400, John Hinton wrote:
> My point is these 'security metrics' businesses that are paid, generally
> by credit card companies, to do these software scans and don't ever do
> these most basic checks. Not that my quoted text is the name of one of
> these compa
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:35:47PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> It has been stated many times and on many fora that Red Hat's bugzilla is
> not a mechanism for support. They are under no obligation to address
> issues raised there. Is it nice when they do? Absolutely.
There are two i
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 05:21:50AM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> e.g.
> System A
> eth0 -> lan switch/router 1
> eth1 -> lan switch/router 2
>
> System B
> eth0 -> lan switch 1
> eth1 -> lan switch 2
>
> Then somehow specify that, if lan switch 1 fails, the two systems will
> switch to usin
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:51:51AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
> Even if the limit were lower, such as 10 physical interfaces as mentioned
> before, I have to imagine that the host system would have issues dealing
> with the number of interrupts needed to *PROPERLY* service all of those
> interfaces
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:52:02AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> > Filed some bug reports, and it was evident from the response that very, very
> > few Linux users ever go> 4 eth's on a system. Thus the lack of properly
> > debugged IPv6 support for that then. Fortunately I don't (yet) need IPv6
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:47:00PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> I found one BIOS entry, "Virtualization technology"; it was initially
> disabled, but I enabled it before I installed CENTOS, and verified that it
> was still enabled later (I reported enabling it in my original message).
> I'll
In using virt-install, and then virt-viewer to create a CentOS 5.5 x64 guest
(in my case for KVM), using the text mode for the install, it failed on me
in a similar way just if I added extra package groups - just stalled. It
went forward successfully if I just went with the standard default at that
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:01:32AM +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
>
> On 7/18/10, Jerry Franz wrote:
> > Everything you listed is interactive realtime or near-realtime graphics
> > intensive. A cloud is not really suited to that kind of task to begin
> > with.
>
> I don't inderstand why it
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 07:58:02AM -0700, Mark wrote:
> And after that I can't reach the modem or the internet. If I run
> ifdown eth0 and then ifup eth0, I get the 192.168.0.100 IP address
> back, and I can reach the modem, but not the internet.
What do you see with "ip ro ls"? Is there a defaul
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
