Re: [CentOS] Is Centos 5.5 too old fro Google Chrome?

2011-04-03 Thread Vnpenguin
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 06:51, Todd Cary wrote: > I tried to install Google Chrome and received the dependencies > error.  Is Centos too old for the new Chrome or is there an older > Chrome version that is compatible? You need CentOS 6 or Fedora 14 to run Google Chrome :-) ___

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 on X86_64: yum installs both i386 and x86_64 packages

2009-10-13 Thread Vnpenguin
I removed all i?86 on my x86_64 servers. No problem. -- http://vnoss.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.4 .x86_64 and perl.i386

2009-10-25 Thread Vnpenguin
Why need perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 on x86_64 box ? On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 16:02, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > To All, > > Thanks to the CentOS guys for 5.4; sure appreciate your work. > > I have one question.  I had to remove perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 on two > x86_64 machines in order to get per

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2.x

2009-11-02 Thread Vnpenguin
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 20:46, CentOS List wrote: >> Are there reliable repositories for PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5? > > Try epl. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL > > I don't think you can found PHP 5.2 at EPEL repo. However I can found PHP 5.2.10 & 5.3 at Remi repo (http://rpms.famillecollet.com/en

Re: [CentOS] anyone tried firefox 3.5 under centos 5.4

2009-11-11 Thread Vnpenguin
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 15:35, Jim Perrin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Janez Kosmrlj > wrote: > > Works fine for me using rpms (rebuilt from the src.rpms) on http://mharris.ca/ > > They're basically slightly altered fedora rpms. You have to read the > spec to see the build arguments

Re: [CentOS] Cloned Centos Boxes - First Run to run again?

2010-01-10 Thread Vnpenguin
In my case I installed & configured one box. Make a image with Clonezilla & deploy to another boxes. On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:26, Mr Gabriel wrote: > I need to build a bank of 12 centos boxes, for an experiment I'm doing. > I don't want to install centos 12 times, I'm using virtual box across

Re: [CentOS] Problem with nvidia-drv-x11 when upgrading to CentOS 5.2

2008-06-28 Thread Vnpenguin
My nvidia driver (installed from Nvidia.com's package under CentOS 5.1 x86_64, not rpm) runs well under CentOS 5.2 without any modification. On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Bernhard Gschaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > I know that the nvidia-drv-x11-package is from RPMForge, but I th

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's

2012-02-26 Thread Vnpenguin
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:54, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do. > Yep, rpms LO from libreoffice.org work very well on my CentOS box. ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Terminal - name too long

2010-11-25 Thread Vnpenguin
Just for prompt ? If yes, just play with PS1 : export PS1="\...@myhost \w" If not I think you have to change your hostname, right ? On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 21:36, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Good day, > >> [jo...@unknown2a68 ~]$ > > How/where could I make the above a lot shorter please. >

Re: [CentOS] Terminal - name too long

2010-11-25 Thread Vnpenguin
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 23:02, Johan Scheepers wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: >> On 11/25/10 12:36 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote: >>> Good day, >>> [jo...@unknown2a68 ~]$ >>> How/where could I make the above a lot shorter please. >> >> A) choose a shorter hostname >> >> B) change your defa

Re: [CentOS] Re: slow Perl on CentOS 5

2008-08-27 Thread Vnpenguin
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Mark Pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone want to try and get this built on C5.2? > ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/8/SRPMS/perl-5.8.8-40.fc8.src.rpm > > the above runs in about .4 sec, while on C5.2 it takes 8-12 seconds. > Can not

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 driver for Marvell Yukon 88E8042 PCI-E Fast Ethernet controller

2008-12-10 Thread Vnpenguin
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If the 88E8042 shares the same driver as 88E8056, check out this forum thread: > > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=12895&forum=40 > > Scroll down to note #5 and get the kABI tracking

Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2.x rpm for Centos 5? (any news)

2008-12-23 Thread Vnpenguin
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:48 PM, mbneto wrote: > I've searched the archives and found a post last march about a rpm version > of php for centos. > > Any news about it? > Is it still in testing? > Any known issues? > Where do I get it? > Why need php 5.2.x on CentOS while php 5.1.x works like a ch

Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux

2008-12-28 Thread Vnpenguin
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Mag Gam wrote: >> I am planning to use ZFS on my Centos 5.2 systems. The data I am >> storing is very large text files where each file can range from 10M to >> 20G. I am very interested on the compression feature of ZFS, and it >> seems no oth

Re: [CentOS] RH devel kernels for Centos repo

2009-01-03 Thread Vnpenguin
2009/1/3 David Hrbáč : > Hi, > RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built > against Centos tree are available here: > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/ Is this safe to use ? -- ht

Re: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?

2009-01-23 Thread Vnpenguin
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the > latest updates support it? > We have one box i7 with CentOS 5.2 here. It works very well ;-) > uname -a Linux xxx 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 11:57:43 EST

Re: [CentOS] Old Small Box

2009-01-27 Thread Vnpenguin
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: > I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive > and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it? I have a box PII 333MHz + 128 MB ram running (sshd, samba, httpd,...) CentOS 4.x at home. -- http://vnoss.org ___

[CentOS] After electric breaking: HARDWARE ERROR Kernel panic

2009-02-13 Thread Vnpenguin
Hi all, After an electric breaking, my server (Centos 5.2 x86_64 with all updates) can not boot. The error message on screen is: --- Memory for crash kernel (0x0 to 0x0) notwithin permissible ra

Re: [CentOS] ASUS PT6 or Intel DX58SO for CentOS?

2009-02-16 Thread Vnpenguin
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Chris Boyd wrote: > I'm looking at setting up a new machine to run CentOS 5 and a few > VMWare machines to test Windows XP, Vista, and 7. I'm working with a > custom PC shop and they've recommended I use either the ASUS PT6 or > Intel DX58SO. Any feedback good o

Re: [CentOS] ASUS PT6 or Intel DX58SO for CentOS?

2009-02-16 Thread Vnpenguin
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:54 PM, wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 01:42:46PM +0100, Vnpenguin wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Chris Boyd wrote: >> > I'm looking at setting up a new machine to run CentOS 5 and a few >> > VMWare machines to test Window

Re: [CentOS] After electric breaking: HARDWARE ERROR Kernel panic

2009-02-17 Thread Vnpenguin
Fixed ! I boot with old kernel and reboot again with new kernel. That's ok now Thanks -- http://vnoss.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 i m having problem with gnome

2009-03-10 Thread Vnpenguin
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Tariq Ismail Dalvi wrote: > Hello to all, > > I am having a web server mail server Mysql and name server > on single machine my os is CentOs 5.2 and desktop > gnome everything was working fine now couple of days > back I was using text editor, Fire Fox and GIMP at

Re: [CentOS] Free online book about Linux, based on CentOS 5 (in french)

2010-02-27 Thread Vnpenguin
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:47, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > Last summer I published a cookbook-style detailed introduction to Linux, > based on CentOS. I recently decided to make a free online version > available as well. > > Those among you reading french might be interested. Here's the link : >

Re: [CentOS] Problems after update to 5.5

2010-05-15 Thread Vnpenguin
Just updated ~15 box x86_64 here to CentOS 5.5. Kernel 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 works without any problem. Thanks CentOS team for this excellent work! On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 13:27, Colin Coles wrote: > Hi, >  I have updated 8 machines so far and 2 are refusing to boot on > 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 kernel,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS on desktop

2010-05-23 Thread Vnpenguin
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:51, Jack Hokus wrote: > Hello, > > I use CentOS on desktop. I want to have a new versions of these > programs: OpenOffice, Emacs  and K3B. For OpenOffice you can download rpm of latest release at openoffice.org and install them (via script, not yum). I used OOo 3.2.0 fo

Re: [CentOS] Samba3x daily logged errors with Win7 clients

2010-05-27 Thread Vnpenguin
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 14:08, Steve Snyder wrote: > In the course of upgrading from CentOS 5.4 to CentOS 5.5 I changed from > using the samba (v3.0.x) packages to the samba3x (v3.3.8) packages, > mostly because the newer version was said to better support Win7.  The > Samba server services Linux,

Re: [CentOS] Yum archive for PHP greater than 5.2.1 for CentOS 5.4?

2010-06-24 Thread Vnpenguin
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 04:50, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > > Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than > 5.2.1 > as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer > I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my machines. > http:

Re: [CentOS] how to reformat a partition to ntfs?

2010-08-02 Thread Vnpenguin
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:14, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > With the Windows XP CD. Do a google search on how to install Windows, > or contact Microsoft if you don't know. Excellent respond! Love it :) > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:11 AM, hadi motamedi wrote: >> Dear All >> I want to install win xp on my

Re: [CentOS] Libreoffice.org "official" RPMs in yum friendly format

2012-04-29 Thread Vnpenguin
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 13:55, Nux! wrote: > I thought I "spammed" here as well last night when I sent to the SL > list, but appears not. Sorry for the noise. > > Anyway, for those of you interested to run the RPMs from the > libreoffice.org tarball instead of the stock packages, I put them all i

[CentOS] CentOS-fasttrack.repo not found in mirror.centos.org

2012-08-14 Thread Vnpenguin
Hi, On the page http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories?action=show ... CentOS-6 Fasttrack is now available and can be accessed with the repo configuration here . But link is died: http://mirror.centos.org/centos

Re: [CentOS] Wiki dead links CentOS-Fasttrack

2012-08-18 Thread Vnpenguin
Reported by me 4 days ago, but no reply yet. It seams that nobody pays attention to that! VN_ On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Leonard den Ottolander < leon...@den.ottolander.nl> wrote: > Hello, > > The links under the CentOS-Fasttrack paragraph at > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Re