Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.0 /proc Backup/Restore

On Thursday 10 January 2008 23:18:33 Krautkramer, John wrote: > Hi, > > > > I've recently switched to CentOS 5.0 from RedHat 9.0 and found a new > directory /proc which contains "virtual" files according to the docs. > When I try to run my normal backup which uses cpio to create archives, > it comp

Re: [CentOS] Major update and again no new repodata

On Friday 18 January 2008 12:42:32 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Yesterday I pulled down a major update to OpenOffice. But no updates to > repodata. > > I waited a day to see if there was some reason for the lag (like more > rpms needed to complete the set), but still today, no repodata to pull > down

Re: [CentOS] Auth/Security tool at first boot

On Friday 25 January 2008 17:21:47 Joseph L. Casale wrote: > What is the name of this tool that appears when you reboot from install and > allows you to setup your selinux, iptables and auth configuration? > > Thanks! > jlc firstboot !!! Tony > ___ >

Re: [CentOS] Dump on remote filesystems?

On Tuesday 29 January 2008 12:43:48 Tom Brown wrote: > > I have a couple C5 systems I want to back up. My plan is to, one way > > or another, back them up to a C5 machine in my office. I have samba > > installed on the systems to back up, the machines are mounted on the > > system in my office, a

Re: [CentOS] backup to disk

On Saturday 29 March 2008 18:54:38 Ray Leventhal wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for common practices for backing up user data to disk. My > user data is all in /home. I'm also interested in what folks are doing > for things backing up os and configs. > > Any pointers on setting up rsync, cpio, etc

Re: [CentOS] aide questions, please

On Thursday 10 April 2008 13:51:02 Steve Campbell wrote: > Michael Simpson wrote: > > On 4/9/08, Steve Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jim Perrin wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Marc Wiatrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think those errors are because selinux is off.

Re: [CentOS] NIS binding probs w/Firewall and SELinux

On Friday 07 September 2007 00:58, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > > Is there a file I can edit to ensure SELinux is disabled? The system was > initially installed with SELinux Enabled, then disabled later by me. set SELINUX=disabled in /etc/sysconfig/selinux Tony > > In the meantime, I did find > htt

[CentOS] Vsftpd problem

Hi all, I have a filesystem which I need to make available through ftp ( vsftpd ). I have this as separate filesystem as it needs to be available through apache and NFS also. It's our local mirror. I've set up vsftpd and put a test directory in /var/ftp/pub and it works. However I can't see

Re: [CentOS] Vsftpd problem

On Tuesday 26 June 2007 13:16, Jim Perrin wrote: > On 6/26/07, Tony Molloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is this a permissions problem or does vsftpd not allow separate > > filesystems to be seen. > > Have you looked in the log files for errors? Are you using selinux

Re: [CentOS] Vsftpd problem

On Thursday 28 June 2007 08:58, Feizhou wrote: > > That's probably it. The SELinux problem strikes again. > > If you hate SELinux that much, just turn it off. I don't "hate" it. I just forget that it causes problems sometimes when it's not configured properly. Tony >

Re: [CentOS] Vsftpd problem

On Thursday 28 June 2007 10:18, Feizhou wrote: > Tony Molloy wrote: > > On Thursday 28 June 2007 08:58, Feizhou wrote: > >>> That's probably it. The SELinux problem strikes again. > >> > >> If you hate SELinux that much, just turn it off. > > &

[CentOS] Configure WiFi at install on CentOS Stream 9

Hi, I'm trying to install CS-9 and need to have WiFi setup on boot. I've tried installing with KVM as a test but only get the choice of an ethernet connection at install time. I've tried installing onto a spare laptop and it gives a choice of ethernet or WiFi for network connections. I choose WiF

Re: [CentOS] Centos, Samba , WIN7

On Friday 14 January 2011 07:56:16 Timothy Kesten wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I've fresh installed CentOS 5.5 and realized, that Samba is in version > 3.0.33-3. > Is it possible to conect WIN7 in a Samba-Domäne with this version? > And I've read abaut RHEL 5.6 with samba 3.5.4. > Can I expect, that th

Re: [CentOS] Centos, Samba , WIN7

On Saturday 15 January 2011 04:41:01 Rob Kampen wrote: > Ryan Wagoner wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Timothy Kesten wrote: > >> Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2011, 11:27:22 schrieb John Doe: > >>> Google for "samba windows.7" and click on first answer... > >> > >> I knew, that samba > 3.3 i

Re: [CentOS] cobbler installation of CentOS-5.5

On Monday 28 March 2011 16:37:33 Timothy Murphy wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> 2. The CentOS OS seems to be available in 7 or 8 CDs. > >> (I tried downloading the DVD ISO with ktorrent, > >> but this was a complete failure. > >> It started OK, but then created literally thousands of links >

Re: [CentOS] nlockdmgr listen on privileged port

On Wednesday 30 March 2011 20:35:13 Tim Dunphy wrote: > hey list! > > I am attempting to shore up some centos machines (ranging from centos > 5 to centos 5.4) for pci compliance by changing the port that > nlockdmgr listens on to function under a privileged port. > > So what I did was try to ha

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 & HandBrakeCLI

On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 08:55 -0400, mail...@toolz.com wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University > of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > On 2020-07-13 05:09, Kay Died

Re: [CentOS] New administrator and upgrading systems

On Wednesday 21 October 2009 16:31:13 Alan McKay wrote: > > it will work when your mirror has 5.4 > > ahhh, OK. What if my mirror is the same box? Will that work too? > I cannot see any reason from here why it would not. > > I keep a local mirror on my desktop (the box in question) and am just

Re: [CentOS] Missing yum-priorities in 5.4?

On Thursday 22 October 2009 13:04:05 Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > > Behalf > > >Of Morten Torstensen > >Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:37 PM > >To: CentOS mailing list > >Subject: [CentOS] Missing yum

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:iptables ?

On Saturday 31 October 2009 07:48:05 hadi motamedi wrote: > Dear All > To open a port , I know that I need to go to "System -> Administration -> > Security Level and Firewall" -> Other ports and then I can open port-5901 > as tcp protocol . Can you please do me favor and let me know how it can be >

Re: [CentOS] Inquiry:iptables ?

, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > On Saturday 31 October 2009 07:48:05 hadi motamedi wrote: > > > Dear All > > > To open a port , I know that I need to go to "System -> Administration > > > -> Security Level and Firewall" -> Other por

Re: [CentOS] vsFTP Question

On Thursday 05 November 2009 19:44:55 Victor Subervi wrote: > Hi; > Now that it's installed, how do I start it and add a user? I can hardly > believe there is *no* documentation! > TIA, > Victor man vsftpd /usr/share/doc/vsftp-* Tony -- Dept. of Comp. Sci. University of Limerick. _

[CentOS] Amavisd and ClamAV

Hi, I want to move my mail server from sendmail to postfix over christmas. I've got a test server running with the following: postfix dovecot postgrey amavisd-new clamav spamassassin I've followed the howto's on the wiki with the exception that I installed amav

Re: [CentOS] Amavisd and ClamAV

On Friday 27 November 2009 09:49:54 John Doe wrote: > From: Tony Molloy > > > Things work OK with the exception of clamav. When I start clamav I get > > the following error. > > [r...@newgoext ~]# service clamd.amavisd start > > Starting clamd.amavisd: ERROR: Missi

Re: [CentOS] An error message I don't recognize

On Thursday 10 December 2009 17:28:45 Bob McConnell wrote: > I have recently been told I will have to maintain some CentOS servers at > work. Since I have only been using Slackware for the last 16 years, I > decided to install CentOS on one of my servers at home to get an idea of > the differences.

[CentOS] Problem with Full install of 5.2, missing rpm

Hi, I did a standard i386 install of 5.2 on a test machine. Then I ran the following command yum install \* and got the following error. Error: Missing Dependency: pilot-link-devel >= 0.11.8 is needed by package gnome-pilot-devel Checking my local repo and my usual upstream mirrors for pi

Re: [CentOS] Problem with Full install of 5.2, missing rpm

On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:21:31 Karanbir Singh wrote: > Tony Molloy wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos > > /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm > > /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-dev

Re: [CentOS] Problem with Full install of 5.2, missing rpm

On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:21:31 Karanbir Singh wrote: > Tony Molloy wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos > > /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm > > /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-dev

Re: [CentOS] Problem with Full install of 5.2, missing rpm

On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:27:27 Karanbir Singh wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: > > Tony Molloy wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos > >> /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm > > > &g

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy

On Saturday 05 July 2008 16:47:03 Jay Leafey wrote: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > I am trying to install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 from rf and it is failing > > suggesting it needs /usr/bin/false. #yum whatprovides "/usr/bin/false" > > yields nothing. > > > > My CentOS 5.1 machines don't have this, and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy

On Sunday 06 July 2008 05:07:38 Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >I had no trouble copying it or linking it. > > Yes, but how does that satisfy yum? > jlc If the dependancy is purely on /usr/bin./false then when you copy it I think yum should find it. The problem would be if yum checks it's db to see

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy

On Sunday 06 July 2008 07:20:33 Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >Why don't you try it and see what happens. > > I did, which is what lead me to believe it only checks the db:) > jlc Sorry, Tony Then you have a problem ;-) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy

On Sunday 06 July 2008 11:39:50 William L. Maltby wrote: > On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 06:52 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote: > > > > > > The problem would be if yum checks it's db to see if it has previously > > installed /usr/bin/false and find that it hasn't. In that c

[CentOS] Yun Update problem

Hi, I've just done a clean install of centos-5.2 x86-64. When I do a update I get the following errors = Package Arch Version RepositorySize

Re: [CentOS] Yun Update problem

On Tuesday 15 July 2008 18:34:51 Kenneth Burgener wrote: > On 7/15/2008 9:57 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > (34/92): selinux-policy-2 100% |=| 381 kB > > 00:00 > > http://thomond.csis.ul.ie/mirrors/centos/5/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-po > >licy

Re: [CentOS] Yun Update problem

On Tuesday 15 July 2008 18:47:51 Tony Molloy wrote: > On Tuesday 15 July 2008 18:34:51 Kenneth Burgener wrote: > > On 7/15/2008 9:57 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > > (34/92): selinux-policy-2 100% |=| 381 kB > > > 00:00 > > > http://thomond

Re: [CentOS] Yun Update problem

On Thursday 17 July 2008 01:45:50 Camron W. Fox wrote: > Tony Molloy wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 July 2008 18:47:51 Tony Molloy wrote: > >> On Tuesday 15 July 2008 18:34:51 Kenneth Burgener wrote: > >>> On 7/15/2008 9:57 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > &

Re: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?

On Wednesday 23 July 2008 13:45:31 Kai Schaetzl wrote: > I want to try out fail2ban and notice that both, kbs-CentOS-Testing and > ATrpms, have shorewall as a dependency. I do not use shorewall and have > never used it. I have my own iptables/firewall script and am happy with > it. Can I install sh

Re: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?

On Wednesday 23 July 2008 14:31:11 Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Tony Molloy wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:53:49 +0100: > > I installed fail2ban from rpmforge and it has no dependencies. > > Ah, thanks, I thought I had installed an rpm earlier that didn't have > dependencies,

[CentOS] Applications on different deskops at startup

Hi, I've just converted my laptop to Centos 6 from Fedora ( gnome 3 made the latest fedora unusable ) and I have one problem. I have several desktops with applications running on them, mainly terminals. At login all the terminals start on desktop 1. How do I get them to start on the desktop t

Re: [CentOS] Applications on different deskops at startup

On Friday 25 November 2011 00:31:09 Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Vreme: 11/24/2011 09:14 PM, Kahlil Hodgson piše: > > On 24/11/11 22:27, Tony Molloy wrote: > >> I have several desktops with applications running on them, > >> mainly terminals. At login all the terminals s

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

On Sunday 08 January 2012 23:19:39 Bennett Haselton wrote: > On 1/8/2012 7:28 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > On 01/08/2012 03:15 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote: > >> It's a file created by one of my CGI scripts. (The web server > >> is accessed by several hostnames which are dynamically assigned >

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

On Monday 09 January 2012 12:06:04 Bennett Haselton wrote: > On 1/9/2012 3:41 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > First I'm no SELinux expert ;-( but I've ben following this > > thread with interest. It apears to be going around in circles. > > > > The only time I&#

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

On Monday 09 January 2012 20:00:29 Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Monday 09 January 2012 11:45:26 Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon > > will not change the labels. It would be best to just remove the > > content from /tmp and allow new content to

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

On Tuesday 10 January 2012 04:05:43 Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Monday 09 January 2012 15:29:59 Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > file_t means the file has no label, so the only way to create > > this type of file would be to remove the security attributes on > > the file. On an SELinux system, file_t shou

Re: [CentOS] LDAP howto using ds-base and ds-admin and related consoles

On Thursday 30 July 2009 19:23:24 Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Rob Kampen > wrote: [snip] > > > I have read many hundreds of pages, have purchased O'reilly's LDAP System > > Administration but cannot seem to get my dirsrv based LDAP to function. > > I do understand that ds us

Re: [CentOS] LDAP howto using ds-base and ds-admin and related consoles

On Friday 31 July 2009 15:05:29 Craig White wrote: > > I'm going through the Howto:Samba from at > > the moment and hopefully that will get me started. > > > > But what would be nice is: > > > > 1. Howto:migtate existing NIS to CentosDS > > 2. Howto:migrate existing Samba to CentosDS > > >

Re: [CentOS] LDAP howto using ds-base and ds-admin and related consoles

On Friday 31 July 2009 16:12:12 Craig White wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 16:00 +0100, Tony Molloy wrote: > > > But this all would be virtually impossible without a decent > > > > knowledge of > > > > > how LDAP works and that is regardless

Re: [CentOS] Dell E6410

On Monday 25 October 2010 20:21:43 Bo Lynch wrote: > On Mon, October 25, 2010 3:19 pm, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > 2010/10/25 Bo Lynch : > >> Just recently bought a Dell E6410 with a Intel® HD Graphics with > >> ExpressCard with I7-640m processor. Having some issues getting a > >> graphical > >> env

Re: [CentOS] difference between cron and shell invocation.

On Tuesday 07 December 2010 14:34:33 James B. Byrne wrote: > I have a fairly involved root cron task that I moved verbatim from > another server. On the original server, this task ran without > problem. On the new server, when this task runs via cron, which I > confirm is happening by looking in t

Re: [CentOS] need filesystem recommendation

On Saturday 11 October 2008 15:11:57 Mag Gam wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a backup site and I would like to rsync from production to > backup site. However, I would like to have all backups be compressed > so I can save space. Can anyone recommend a good way to do this? I am > currently using tar an

Re: [CentOS] nfs mounted /home and selinux

On Thursday 30 October 2008 21:00:35 Marc Wiatrowski wrote: > I'm trying to set the context on an nfs mounted /home. I believe > exactly like in Redhat's Deployment Guide at > > http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.2/html/Deployme >nt_Guide/ch45s02s03.html > > > On my system

Re: [CentOS] Can't update CentOS 5.2

On Saturday 10 January 2009 12:45:13 Mário Gamito wrote: > Alain PORTAL wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Le samedi 10 janvier 2009, Mário Gamito a écrit : > >> I have Internet connection, but I cant ping mirrorlist.centos.org and > >> http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5&arch=i386&repo=os just stalls. > >

Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors

On Tuesday 31 March 2009 18:41:48 Florin Andrei wrote: > On one mirror that I tried, at least. > > So, is it live yet? :-) Well It's live on my local mirror. I've just done a yum update on a test server and everything seems OK. So it looks like the wait was worth it. Good job to all those CentO

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade

On Wednesday 01 April 2009 08:00:12 Tony Molloy wrote: > On Wednesday 01 April 2009 03:34:03 Ned Slider wrote: > > Thomas Dukes wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Just did yum update. There were numerous packages to be updated. I > > > get this is

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade

On Wednesday 01 April 2009 03:34:03 Ned Slider wrote: > Thomas Dukes wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Just did yum update. There were numerous packages to be updated. I get > > this is the newest release of Centos. > > > > The update bombed stating I need nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5. I did a rpm -q nss > > and

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade

On Wednesday 01 April 2009 02:36:36 Thomas Dukes wrote: > Hello, > > Just did yum update. There were numerous packages to be updated. I get > this is the newest release of Centos. > > The update bombed stating I need nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5. I did a rpm -q nss > and nss-3.12.2.0-4.el5 is install in C

Re: [CentOS] NFS client firewall config?

ountd > 151 tcp 4003 mountd > 152 udp 4003 mountd > 152 tcp 4003 mountd > 153 udp 4003 mountd > 153 tcp 4003 mountd > Hi, NFS by default uses random high numbered ports. See "48996 nlockmgr"

Re: [CentOS] NFS client firewall config?

On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:23:43 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > On Thursday 18 February 2010 11:00:53 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Which ports do I need to have open on an NFS client's

Re: [CentOS] crontab and/or anacrontab ?

On Thursday 11 March 2010 12:50:13 Timothy Murphy wrote: > Is one meant to have one or the other? > If so, which is recommended? > I have > > [...@helen etc]$ cat anacrontab > # /etc/anacrontab: configuration file for anacron > > # See anacron(8) and anacrontab(5)

Re: [CentOS] crontab and/or anacrontab ?

On Thursday 11 March 2010 16:00:49 Timothy Murphy wrote: > Tony Molloy wrote: > > anacron is for machines that are not up 24x7 so they could miss some of > > the times when "cron jobs" were to be run. So anacron wakes up and checks > > the /etc/anacrontab file

Re: [CentOS] crontab and/or anacrontab ?

On Thursday 11 March 2010 16:17:13 Timothy Murphy wrote: > Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > let's take the case that you have a power failure or a scheduled > > maintenance with your system for instance in the early morning hours, > > from 03:00am - 05:00am. cron.daily is set by default to run at 04:02a

Re: [CentOS] Not firewall, but what?

On Friday 07 May 2010 05:38:45 Jussi Hirvi wrote: > Ok, thanks for ideas - many new things to test. So far no luck. > > Too bad i don't have first-hand access to any of the client machines who > *do* have this problem. > > Next, I will go and switch the ethernet cable to a different slot on the >

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

On Wednesday 19 May 2010 15:46:57 Anthony Caetano wrote: > Hi > > We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (**), the > CentOS one is 4602MB (***) split over two DVDs. Is this reasonable and > correct? Any ideas why would there be such a discrepancy if they are > built from

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 ISO size vs RHEL

On Wednesday 19 May 2010 17:24:49 Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 May 2010 15:46:57 Anthony Caetano wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > We use CentOS and RHEL, the 5.5 RHEL ISO for x86_64 is 3.7GB (

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 on optiplex 745

On Monday 28 June 2010 12:58:36 Janez Kosmrlj wrote: > Hi, > we have some old dell optiplex 745 machines which have the Intel 965q > chipset. The problem is, that they freeze as soon as the system tries to > start the X system. It happens even before any log is written. This happens > almost every

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.5 install, missing libraries: where did I go wrong?

On Saturday 15 August 2015 06:59:36 Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I had a CentOS 6.5 CD for a clean install, and I did a desktop > install. Then I did a yum update to bring it up to 6.7. So far, so > good. > > I run a bunch of scientific programs that use C++ compilers and > li

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2 laptop Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (rev c4)

On Thursday 14 April 2016 03:42:50 Philip V wrote: > With CentOS 7.2 a laptop wireless card is recognized in dmesg, but > nonfunctional. Toggling the hardware wifi switch causes the > Bluetooth icon to appear and disappear. The network configuration > window shows the Wireless tab greyed out. Re

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2 laptop wireless Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (rev c4)

On Friday 15 April 2016 07:24:40 Andreas Benzler wrote: > Good morning Philip, > > Some of you say Centos 7.0 works why not download this kernel from > vault.centos.org and install with yum > install kernel…rpm? > > Sincerely > > Andy > CentOS 7.0 works when install

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2 laptop wireless Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (rev c4)

On Friday 15 April 2016 08:34:06 Tony Molloy wrote: > On Friday 15 April 2016 07:24:40 Andreas Benzler wrote: > > Good morning Philip, > > > > Some of you say Centos 7.0 works why not download this kernel > > from vault.centos.org <http://vault.centos.org/> and in

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2 laptop wireless Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (rev c4)

On Friday 15 April 2016 13:48:58 Brandon Vincent wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > So any ideas. > > I may have missed this but what model laptop are we talking about? > > Brandon Vincent > _

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2 laptop wireless Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (rev c4)

On Friday 15 April 2016 15:37:26 Tony Molloy wrote: > On Friday 15 April 2016 13:48:58 Brandon Vincent wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Tony Molloy > > wrote: > > > So any ideas. > > > > I may have missed this but what model laptop are we talkin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2 laptop wireless Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (rev c4)

el/x86_64/ ? > > > > Sincerely > > > > Andy > > > > Am Dienstag, den 19.04.2016, 20:12 -0400 schrieb Philip V: > > > Toshiba Satellite Pro P870 > > > Part PSPLFU-039011 > > > > > > (I have the same symptoms as Tony reported.) > &g

[CentOS] Possible repo polllution

Hi, I've just been checking my local copy of the CentOS repos. I found 200+ i386/i686 packages in both the updates/5/RPMS and updates/6/Packages directories. I checked with my rsync site ( ftp.heanet.ie ) and the equivalent UK site ( ftp.mirrorservice.org ) and they both carried these pack

Re: [CentOS] Possible repo polllution

On Friday 30 November 2012 14:21:12 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Tony Molloy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've just been checking my local copy of the CentOS repos. I > > found 200+ i386/i686 packages in both the updates/5/RPMS and > > updates/6/Packages direct

Re: [CentOS] Large yum update

On Saturday 19 January 2013 03:51:53 E.B. wrote: > Hi, > > On about 8am GMT Jan 18, my server reported an unusually large > number of yum updates available. > > I think this is due to the release of CentOS 5.9: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.centos.announce/7203 > > However, I just w

Re: [CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

On Thursday 21 February 2013 11:25:44 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On 02/21/2013 04:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 21 February 2013 01:28, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> It looks like no system, internal or external could access the > >> DNS on my new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and

Re: [CentOS] Run multiple instance of apache

On Monday 27 May 2013 12:29:18 Rainer Duffner wrote: > Am Mon, 27 May 2013 14:16:45 +0300 > > schrieb Mihamina Rakotomandimby : > > On 2013-05-27 14:14, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > > When your infrastructure is completely virtualized, it may make > > > no sense. > > > But some people still prefer to

Re: [CentOS] 404 Error

On Sunday 16 June 2013 06:19:33 Mark LaPierre wrote: > Hey Y'all, > > I got this error from yum > > http://vault.centos.org/6.4/os/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] > PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found" > > Has the path to the repo changed? > http://vault.cento

Re: [CentOS] run script on cron job only run on first Saturdat every month???

On Tuesday 30 July 2013 22:58:34 John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/30/2013 2:32 PM, Keith Keller wrote: > > 15 04 1-7 * 6 /home/app/oracle/backup/monthlybk.sh > > maybe... > > 15 04 * * 6 test $(date +"%d") -le 07 && > /home/app/oracle/backup/monthlybk.sh > > (untested) Run an incremental back

Re: [CentOS] Disappearing Network Manager config scripts

On Monday 05 May 2014 00:22:52 Evan Rowley wrote: > When I started this thread a week ago, I certainly did not expect > this many replies. Without a doubt it seems Network Manager is a > controversial topic. I still haven't worked out my Network Manager > woes and just lost an hour troubleshooti

Re: [CentOS] Dual boot with 2 drives

On Saturday 09 August 2014 11:23:10 Alan McRae wrote: > No problems Joe. I have done this multiple times. > > I assume you have Fedora 20 on sda (the first disk) with > the bootloader (grub2) on sda. Your BIOS will be set to boot sda. > > You install CentOS 7 on sdb (obvious). > > Your options a

[CentOS] Upgrade to m7.0 retaining some existing partitions

Hi, I want to install 7.0 replacing an existing 6.5 installation. When I choose custom partitioning I can delete the old 6.5 partitions and create new partitions 7.0 but there doesn't appear to be any way to retain an existing partition, say /home for instance, over the installation. Am I

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade to m7.0 retaining some existing partitions

On Friday 22 August 2014 14:00:45 you wrote: > Le 19.08.2014 08:44, Tony Molloy a écrit : > > I want to install 7.0 replacing an existing 6.5 installation. > > > > When I choose custom partitioning I can delete the old 6.5 > > partitions and create new partitions 7

[CentOS] RPM install/upgrade problem

Hi, For the last few updates I'm having a yum problem. # yum update gives the following error for e.g. Running transaction Updating : bash-4.2.45-5.el7_0.2.x86_64 1/10 Error unpacking rpm package bash-4.2.45-5.el7_0.2.x86_64 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/bin/

Re: [CentOS] RPM install/upgrade problem

d. Funny thing was late last week it upgraded the bash rpm but failed on the bash-doc rpm. So in the end I just reinstalled the server and everything went fine. Thanks, Tony. > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > For the last

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 re-install

On Thursday 06 November 2014 14:27:31 James B. Byrne wrote: > On Wed, November 5, 2014 19:41, Richard wrote: > > Original Message > > > >> Date: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 15:53:53 -0500 > >> From: "James B. Byrne" > >> To: centos@centos.org > >> Subject: [CentOS] CentO

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 re-install

On Friday 07 November 2014 13:43:42 James B. Byrne wrote: > On Thu, November 6, 2014 10:02, Tony Molloy wrote: > > Hi James, > > > > From an old email of mine to the list. > > > >> Hi Tony > >> > >> Did you receive an answer to your q

Re: [CentOS] Frefox update from firefox-60.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 to 60.2.1-1.el7.centos.x86_64 lost master password

one 7. Shutdown firefox and restart it, master password and accounts gone check recreated key3.db file and it has permissions as above. I'm stumped. Any ideas gratefully accepted ;-) Tony. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Tony Molloy Home ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Frefox update from firefox-60.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 to 60.2.1-1.el7.centos.x86_64 lost master password

; > Akemi > > Hi Akemi, That sorted the problem for me, thanks. Now to start re-entering all my previously stored passwords. Lucky I have a list of sites if not the usernames/passwords ;-( Regards Tony > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > >

Re: [CentOS] Frefox update from firefox-60.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64 to 60.2.1-1.el7.centos.x86_64 lost master password

On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 17:55 +1300, Rob Kampen wrote: > On 05/10/18 01:27, Tony Molloy wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 21:27 +1300, Rob Kampen wrote: > > > On 04/10/18 05:45, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:19 AM Stephen John Smoogen

Re: [CentOS] [OT] EPEL update?

the problem The same dependency holds for several mate packages. So either hold back on the update until mate is updated or build it yourself are the choices.. Regards, Tony. > -- Tony Molloy Home ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] [OT] EPEL update?

On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 09:16 -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 12/04/2018 09:08 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > > > > The same dependency holds for several mate packages. > > > > So either hold back on the update until mate is updated or build it > > yourself ar

Re: [CentOS] [OT] EPEL update?

On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 12:56 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 12:18, Richard net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Date: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 17:08:52 + > > > From: Tony Molloy > > > > > > On Mon, 2018-

Re: [CentOS] C7 on Dell Precision 7530

//lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I see you got no replies to your question so here goes. I've got CentOS 7 running on a Dell Precision 7510 workstation. It has NVidia graphics but I've never had problems with Intel graphics on any CentOS box bef

[CentOS] Possible Font problem with CentOS 7

ext box at the bottom of the page and I can select it. I suspect I'm missing some common font(s). Any ideas. Regards, Tony -- Tony Molloy Home ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Possible Font problem with CentOS 7

depend on what you're using for a system theme. But the > setting you need to fix is under Text and Background Color. > Thanks, that sorted the terminal problem. Now for the e-mail problem. Regards, Tony > On Wed, 06 Nov 2019 19:45:22 + > Tony Molloy wrote: > > >

Re: [CentOS] Possible Font problem with CentOS 7

ov, 2019 at 19:45:22 +, Tony Molloy wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've got a possible font problem with a fully updated CentOS 7 > > system. > > > > An example with the man command. > > > > #man kill > > > > Should retu

Re: [CentOS] What about Mate Desktop on Centos 8?

recent post to the list where someoen ported the Fedora > > rpms, does that help you? > > > > I see, that is indeed unfortunate. Although I have been using Linux > for some time, I am a complete beginner to compiling etc. > > Do you ha

Re: [CentOS] What about Mate Desktop on Centos 8?

e-1.20 for CentOS 7. Sorry for the noise, should read the e-mail before replying ;-( -- Tony Molloy Home ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

  1   2   >