Re: [CentOS] KVM problem after update to 5.6

2011-04-11 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Riccardo Veraldi wrote: > > Hello, after updating to Cents 5.6 and so to kvm-83-224 > my KVM virtual machines qemu qcow2 based images do not start anymore. > Looking at VM console the error message is that VM media is not bootable. > > What's wrong with qemu images

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

2011-04-11 Thread Tom Brown
>> I'm hazarding a guess here - that the os/{i386,x86_64}/CentOS/*.rpm's that >> have 'centos' in the name have had changes made for CentOS. The others >> have not and the sources are available from upstream at eg >> >> http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/ >

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

2011-04-11 Thread Tom Brown
> Instead of removing the unwanted .repo files, replace them with empty files. > That way an upgrade should just result in a .rpmnew file being created. because by removing them from the centos-release package and rebuilding it they are not there in the first place. ___

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring power consumption

2011-04-13 Thread Tom Diehl
run the server. (along with lots of other info) > > An external device would be fine if I could somehow transfer the > information to my centos server where I want to remotely access / > process this information. Since killawatt was brought up, how about http://www.ladyada.net/make/t

Re: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?

2011-04-18 Thread Tom Sorensen
that is causing the issue). If, for some reason, you cannot update then you should seriously consider whether or not those systems can connect to the Internet, or if you should get the glibc from Scientific Linux that has the 3 patches that do not cause an issue in the meantime. Tom Sorensen _

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

2011-04-20 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:06 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:27:16PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: >> >> Maybe having it said so publicly and be such a respected Linux community >> member may help certain people wake up and smell the coffee. > > Respected?  I can't recall a si

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access

2011-04-27 Thread Tom Grace
On 26/04/11 22:19, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > Nomachine is the best solution. You are connected via SSH tunnel so you > are protected. Also, you do not have to be logged on to Gnome/KDE to use it. > And there is more. There is option to setup Java based NX server so you > ca

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

2011-05-08 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:19 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 01:34:54PM -0400, Tom H wrote: >> >> If CentOS had a communication policy, it could spare itself these >> types of articles... > > No.  These types of articles will continue t

Re: [CentOS] Blog article about the state of CentOS

2020-06-17 Thread Tom Bishop
*snip > > > Thank you for sharing, I found it interesting. > > My 2 Cent > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos +1 Longtime user but with the current sturcture they have turned it (centos8) i

Re: [CentOS] Blog article about the state of CentOS

2020-06-20 Thread Tom Bishop
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020, 5:41 AM Peter wrote: > On 20/06/20 3:29 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > How is this going to be fixed .. Welcome to CentOS Stream > > > > Stream will be , once it is fully implemented, the ACTUAL development of > > RHEL the 'next point release' on git.centos.org in the open. >

[CentOS] Dumb Centos 8 DNF mirror question...

2020-08-12 Thread Tom Bishop
I have several Centos 8 machines that I update and every now and again I will go through and update all of them and one of them will get a slow mirror, like downloading the kernel at 50kb etc. With the newer version I am unable to figure out how to force it to update the mirror list and hopefully

Re: [CentOS] Dumb Centos 8 DNF mirror question...

2020-08-12 Thread Tom Bishop
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:02 AM Tom Bishop wrote: > I have several Centos 8 machines that I update and every now and again I > will go through and update all of them and one of them will get a slow > mirror, like downloading the kernel at 50kb etc. With the newer version I > am unab

Re: [CentOS] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-08 Thread Tom Bishop
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:07 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > The future of the CentOS Project is CentOS Stream, and over the next > year we’ll be shifting focus from CentOS Linux, the rebuild of Red Hat > Enterprise Linux (RHEL), to CentOS Stream, which tracks just ahead of a > current RHEL release. CentOS

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-08 Thread Tom Bishop
LOL, laughing with you not at you, license free RHEL. Just RHEL (IBM) wanting to increase the coffers for RHEL. I know, I know thats not whats really happening but yeah that is what is really happening. If you want a tested production worthy server install based on RHEL then you will have to pay

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-08 Thread Tom Bishop
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 10:15 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 12/8/20 10:41 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:39 AM Jonathan Billings > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:28:30AM -0500, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >>> You have published a CentOS Lifecycle that states the

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-08 Thread Tom Bishop
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 10:59 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 12/8/20 11:29 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > I see a lot of promises that Stream will have better engagement with > > the community. Why would we trust these promises? > > "Better engagement with the community" of course requires that th

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-08 Thread Tom Bishop
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 11:11 AM Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/8/20 11:02 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:59 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 12/8/20 11:29 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > >>> I see a lot of promises that Stream will have better engagement with > >>>

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-08 Thread Tom Bishop
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 11:29 AM Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/8/20 11:19 AM, Marc Balmer via CentOS wrote: > > Am I the only one to perceive CentOS/RedHat team members responses as > quite arrogant? > > I am sorry you feel that way. I was trying to help. Red Hat has > several programs where they g

Re: [CentOS] Moving to CentOS 8 Stream

2020-12-09 Thread Tom Bishop
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 8:01 AM Pete Biggs wrote: > > It's got to be done, so may as well test it ... > > The FAQ says to do: > >dnf install centos-release-stream >dnf distro-sync > > This I did and everything went fine. I checked before doing the distro- > sync and there was a load of new S

Re: [CentOS] Moving to CentOS 8 Stream

2020-12-09 Thread Tom Bishop
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:32 AM Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > > > I thought I saw a reply from Johnny that streams wasn't quite ready, > maybe > > > he will chime in but that's what I thought I saw in a response. > > What, in amongst the hundreds of messages, he said it wasn't ready!! > Why publis

Re: [CentOS] [EXT] Re: https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-09 Thread Tom Bishop
Well looks like the jokes have already started, some one from work sent this to me this morning - https://centos.rip/ No association etc not sure who etc... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] dnf script to cherry pick updates and maintain RHEL compatibility

2020-12-09 Thread Tom Bishop
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 12:27 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 06:02:37PM +, James Pearson wrote: > > why don't they just make RHEL available to all for 'free', and you just > > pay for support if you need it - i.e. a bit like it is now, RHEL if you > > pay, CentOS if you don't

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream from bottom works, what is this?

2020-12-10 Thread Tom Bishop
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:09 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 05:02:17PM +, Bernstein, Noam CIV USN NRL > (6393) Washington DC (USA) via CentOS wrote: > > That's my understanding, iff you automatically install all CentOS stream > > updates the moment they become available.

Re: [CentOS] Announcing Open-sourced & Community-Driven RHEL Fork by CloudLinux

2020-12-10 Thread Tom Bishop
+1 Looks like between Springdale, Rocky and CloudLinux there will be options. Such a bad decision that RH made to do this... On Thu, Dec 10, 2020, 1:05 PM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Someone is smarter then Red Hat/IBM, "Carpe Diem": > > Announcing Open-sourced & Community-Driven RHEL Fork by C

Re: [CentOS] Announcing Open-sourced & Community-Driven RHEL Fork by CloudLinux

2020-12-11 Thread Tom Bishop
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 7:53 AM Scott Robbins wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 01:09:46PM +, Liam O'Toole wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Dec, 2020 at 07:48:25 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > > > One assumes however, that this wouldn't happen with OEL, though one > never > > > knows. > > > > OEL = Orac

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 future

2020-12-15 Thread Tom Bishop
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 11:06 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > I don't think there will be a course change either, but for different > reasons. The motivation isn't "cashing/selling out". It's... actually the > stated motivation > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/faq-centos-stream-updates#Q2 > > > --

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 future

2020-12-15 Thread Tom Bishop
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 12:07 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:24:03AM -0600, Tom Bishop wrote: > > I know you and other RHEL folks keep saying this about cashing out etc, > but > > they could have kept stream and Centos stable at the same time but chose &

Re: [CentOS] Blog article: CentOS is NOT dead

2020-12-15 Thread Tom Bishop
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 5:35 PM Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/15/20 5:11 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:04 PM Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > >> On 12/14/20 8:25 AM, James Pearson wrote: > >>> Nicolas Kovacs > > Here's an interesting read which makes a point for CentO

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

2021-01-05 Thread Tom Bishop
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021, 5:03 PM Jamie Burchell wrote: > > Probably. For a lot of users, Stream is a drop-in replacement that's > better than CentOS was > > We will need to (manually) migrate to Stream 9.x after 5 years instead of > 10 though? > > Well that's the part that hasn't fully been laid o

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

2021-01-06 Thread Tom Bishop
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, 2:44 PM Jamie Burchell wrote: > I'll be the first to admit I don't like change and arguably I'm in the > wrong industry for that, but that's another matter. However I don't want to > throw away years of experience with CentOS/Fedora and time invested (mine > personally and my

Re: [CentOS] almalinux?

2021-04-07 Thread Tom Bishop
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021, 9:11 AM Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 4/5/21 1:42 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > On 4/5/21 12:55 PM, Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote: > >> Also maintained by business unit, which might impact later changes > >> when you > >> tight your prod to it. > > > > A major part of the announcemen

[CentOS] C7: NM and changing MAC addresses

2021-10-11 Thread Tom Yates
t the first or second frame with the "bad" mac address is always a BOOTP/DHCP frame, so i'm open to the idea that this is dhclient being "helpful", rather than NM. does anyone have any idea which daemon or service is responsible for this MAC-rebadging, and/or

Re: [CentOS] C7: NM and changing MAC addresses

2021-10-11 Thread Tom Yates
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, José María Terry Jiménez wrote: El 11/10/21 a las 13:00, Tom Yates escribió: On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, José María Terry Jiménez wrote: Hello Perhaps the solution is this: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/70215HWADDR= thanks, but either that link is broken, or the

Re: [CentOS] C7: NM and changing MAC addresses

2021-10-12 Thread Tom Yates
go down the pipe invisibly, save for its effect on my internet traffic. -- Tom Yates - https://www.teaparty.net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] C7 pam_oath.so changes group ownership of system file

2022-06-04 Thread Tom Yates
]$ sudo -l One-time password (OATH) for `me': [...] User me may run the following commands on dormouse: (ALL) ALL [me@dormouse ~]$ ls -la /etc/users.oath -rw---. 1 root me 550 Jun 4 10:33 /etc/users.oath -- Tom Yates - https://w

Re: [CentOS] How will fragmentation help Red Hat

2023-07-13 Thread Tom Bishop
great idea to make more money they have the right based on the GPL to do it..I moved a few servers to Rocky when they killed Centos but this is it for me, I will migrate my remaining servers over to anything but Redhat, they are dead to me. I had been using Centos for many years, when Karanbir Singh was running things and they would go to meet ups and you could get t-shirts etc..Was a great run but Redhat has ruined all that and now I just could care less what Redhat does from here on out. I'm nobody, but where I do work we have options for which linux distro that we want to run, I can assure you I will not be spinning up an Redhat instances...fool me once, fool me twice... Tom Bishop ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How will fragmentation help Red Hat

2023-07-13 Thread Tom Bishop
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:48 AM Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 2023-07-13 03:12, Simon Matter wrote: > > As I found out yesterday, the fragmentation of the "Enterprise Linux" > > ecosystem just started to come true. > > > I've been trying to figure out what SUSE meant when they announced a > "hard

Re: [CentOS] How will fragmentation help Red Hat

2023-07-13 Thread Tom Bishop
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023, 12:17 PM Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-07-13 09:00, Tom Bishop wrote: > > as > > referenced by one of the many RH articles, we are all just freeloaders > > so we shouldn't be missed. > > > I don't believe there are any Red Hat arti

Re: [CentOS] Current RHEL fragmentation landscape

2023-07-22 Thread Tom Bishop
+1 Frank Personally I am moving all my workloads to anything but. It's clear the direction that Red hat is taking and so be it. I've seen it multiple times with open source projects that just seems like greed kicks in and it's all about making the most $$ that they can. Oh and let's be clear, for

Re: [CentOS] Current RHEL fragmentation landscape

2023-07-24 Thread Tom Bishop
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:13 AM Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 2023-07-22 09:55, frank saporito wrote: > > On 7/22/23 02:29, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> From my point of view, Red Hat doesn't really sell software. They > >> give away software. All of their software is available at no charge, > >> t

[CentOS] Centos-release srpm

2009-10-31 Thread Tom Diehl
Hi, Does anyone know where I can get centos-release-5-4.el5.centos.1.src.rpm? I have looked on several mirrors and that one seems to be MIA. Even Google does not seem to know where it is. I need it so I can rebuild it with my local yum repos in it. Regards, -- Tom Diehl tdi

Re: [CentOS] Centos-release srpm

2009-10-31 Thread Tom Diehl
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 10/31/2009 02:33 PM, Tom Diehl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Does anyone know where I can get centos-release-5-4.el5.centos.1.src.rpm? >> > > there are a couple of srpms that are still pending out, I'll get these >

Re: [CentOS] again, nic driver order

2009-11-22 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Gordon McLellan wrote: > The archives seem to suggest fiddling with udev to > be the answer.  So I modify /etc/udev/rules.d/60-net (or something) > and add a few rules found in an ancient example (those aren't my mac > addresses): > KERNEL=="eth?", SYSFS{address}==

Re: [CentOS] again, nic driver order

2009-11-28 Thread Tom H
i nic is last, so it ends up "owning" the eth0 alias. >> Changing SYSFS to ATTR should do it. > Tom, > > Now I get in the syslog: Unknown key: ATTR{address} > > I also tried ATTRS{address} seen in some examples, same error. > > Digging around google a bit mor

Re: [CentOS] again, nic driver order

2009-11-28 Thread Tom H
>> Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and >> fingers crossed, they seem to work! >> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8", NAME="eth0"  # >> pro/1000gt >> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:e0:81:b5:7a:30", NAME="eth1"  # >> internal 1 >> SUBSYSTE

Re: [CentOS] again, nic driver order

2009-11-28 Thread Tom H
>>> Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules, and >>> fingers crossed, they seem to work! >>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21:4d:c3:e8", NAME="eth0" >>> # pro/1000gt >>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:e0:81:b5:7a:30", NAME="eth1" >>> # internal 1 >>> SUBSYS

[CentOS] Auditd fails to start : Connection refused

2009-12-11 Thread Tom Laramee
of WRITE events for files in that directory (and preferably for all of it's subdirectories)? My kernel version is 2.6.18 (full info below). The audit version is audit.x86_64 0:1.7.13-2.el5 thanks --tom Name : kernel Arch : x86_64 Version: 2.6.18 Release:

Re: [CentOS] Solaris10 forum

2009-12-14 Thread Tom H
> Usually i call out on this list for help on the CentOS matters but today I > am fishing around trying to find an active forum for Solaris. > It's hard to match the community here but I'd like to find the Solaris list > where the most people are. > Just having trouble configuring multipathing on Q

Re: [CentOS] scp copy remote files does NOT copy link?

2009-12-21 Thread Tom H
>>> Does there has way scp not change "link" setup? >> I've always preferred 'rsync -essh -aHv  source host:path' over scp for >> remote copies.  It will generally get everything right and in the case >> where part of the content is already there it is much more efficient. > I know I'm going to b

[CentOS] Cnetos 5.4 ext3 question...

2009-12-28 Thread Tom Bishop
I could find this out but at the moment I dont have a copy of 5.4 running, can anyone tell me for a default centos5.4 install are ext3 barriers on by default? Thanks in advance... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/

Re: [CentOS] Cnetos 5.4 ext3 question...

2009-12-28 Thread Tom Bishop
2009 at 10:25:01AM -0600, Tom Bishop wrote: > > I could find this out but at the moment I dont have a copy of 5.4 > running, > > can anyone tell me for a default centos5.4 install are ext3 barriers on > by > > default? Thanks in advance... > > Pretty sure they are off

Re: [CentOS] Cnetos 5.4 ext3 question...

2009-12-28 Thread Tom Bishop
; > Ds. > > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Bishop > Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:57:10 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cnetos 5.4 ext3 question... > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > Cent

Re: [CentOS] Cnetos 5.4 ext3 question...

2009-12-28 Thread Tom Bishop
Thanks for the explanation, looks like I need to go read some more about barriers to truly understand what is going on. On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Dec 28, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:03 AM, < da.

Re: [CentOS] Hardening

2009-12-28 Thread Tom Bishop
Annother vote for bastille, it works very well. On 12/28/09, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> I would like advice for best practices to secure my linux boxes. Know if I >> have been hacked, know of security breaches, etc. >> >> Can anyone provide advice? > > Check out Bastille Linux. It'

[CentOS] Tyan s4985 motherboard and lm_sensors

2010-01-01 Thread Tom Bishop
Trying to get cpu temps from lm_sensors for a Tyan s4985 motherboard, just installed centos 5.4. Tyan release some lm_sensors conf files and other information which I have done, but I am not getting any cpu temps. I was wondering if anyone out there was running this board and if you have gotten t

Re: [CentOS] Extract Pax archive

2010-01-03 Thread Tom H
> Does anyone know how to extract a pax archive in Linux? I have been > trying with the pax but with no joy perhaps I did not put in the correct > switches. pax -r -pe -f archive.pax (the "e" is to preserve uid, gid, mode, atime, mtime) ___ CentOS maili

[CentOS] Centos 5.4 and TYAN s4985 motherboard....

2010-01-04 Thread Tom Bishop
Was wondering if anyone has any luck with the Tyan s4985 motherboard, I had loaded up the latest 5.4 release and in installed most everything that I wanted but when I loaded it up, as in processor wise it would lock up. Funny thing I could still ssh to it but not do a su - or anything from the cons

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.4 and TYAN s4985 motherboard....

2010-01-04 Thread Tom Bishop
I updated to 2.07 is that the latest? On 1/4/10, Dave Stevens wrote: > On Monday 04 January 2010 07:09:32 am Tom Bishop wrote: >> Was wondering if anyone has any luck with the Tyan s4985 motherboard, I >> had >> loaded up the latest 5.4 release and in installed most everyt

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.4 and TYAN s4985 motherboard....

2010-01-05 Thread Tom Bishop
loaded ubuntu 8.04 and running that right now :( since I needed to get something working, may wait till rhel6 comes along and switch when that sees the light of day, although I'm not sure when that might be...lol On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Thomas Harold wrote: > On 1/4/2010 10:09

[CentOS] Vmware server 2.0.2 and Centos 5.4

2010-01-10 Thread Tom Bishop
I know of the issue using vmware server 2.0.2 and centos 5.4, but is their any reason not to use the .rpm install of for centos? I have always used the .tar file but this time used the rpm and it appeared to install and not crash. I went ahead and did the glib correction but I was wondering if u

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-11 Thread Tom Georgoulias
o do anything special to see and use all of the disks. In my testing, the IO was faster and the storage easier to administer with when using Solaris and ZFS rather than with CentOS and software raid. That kind of box is just made for ZFS. Tom ___ CentOS m

Re: [CentOS] Vmware server 2.0.2 and Centos 5.4

2010-01-11 Thread Tom Bishop
Thanks, rpms have made me lazy ;) On 1/11/10, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Tom Bishop wrote: >> I know of the issue using vmware server 2.0.2 and centos 5.4, but is their >> any reason not to use the .rpm install of  for centos?  I have always used >&

[CentOS] KVM management tools.....

2010-01-12 Thread Tom Bishop
Looking at what my best options for managing KVM via a gui. Running Centos 5.4 and have several machines and want to migrate off of vmware server 2.x. So far it appears that the management tools haven't quite cought up to Vmware but are gaining and closing. I have been looking at convirt, and oth

Re: [CentOS] KVM management tools.....

2010-01-12 Thread Tom Bishop
Thanks and will do... On 1/12/10, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 12/01/10 15:13, Tom Bishop wrote: >> Looking at what my best options for managing KVM via a gui. > > consider posting to the centos-virt list ? > > -- > Karanbir Singh > kbsi...@karan.org | http://www.karan

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-12 Thread Tom Georgoulias
On 01/12/2010 12:20 PM, JohnS wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 16:16 -0500, Tom Georgoulias wrote: >> CentOS 5.4 x86_64 works fine on the x4540s, I've installed it myself and >> didn't have to do anything special to see and use all of the disks. >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Backup server

2010-01-13 Thread Tom Bishop
+1 for Backuppc. On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Sorin Srbu wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've built a new backup server for our linux-clients. > > > > Is Amanda the way to go for a backup-solution? > > > > It seems to be pretty powerful, if a bit finickety to set up init

[CentOS] Mediatomb compile from svn - centos 5.4

2010-01-18 Thread Tom Bishop
Anyone compiled Mediatomb from svn on centos 5.4 and had success? Trying to do this and want to make sure I have all of the dependencies met, thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] UID GID Problems.....

2010-01-19 Thread Tom Bishop
Hoping someone can help me fix something that I apparently messed up, i have the issue that when I untar a file as root the uid and gid that get set are not roots'. I had change a user uid and gid to 1000 via usermo -u etc but somehow it appears to have effected the root user. When I touch fi

Re: [CentOS] UID GID Problems.....

2010-01-19 Thread Tom Bishop
19, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Tom Bishop wrote: > > Hoping someone can help me fix something that I apparently messed up, i > have > > the issue that when I untar a file as root the uid and gid that get set > are > > not r

Re: [CentOS] UID GID Problems.....

2010-01-19 Thread Tom Bishop
and untar the users must have had a uid of a 1000 which on my system equated to my wifes uid...LOL, was too late and it never crossed my mind so when I saw the owner and group as my wife that it was just a shared uid...8>) Thanks for the tips On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:09 AM, wrote: > Tom Bis

[CentOS] /proc/mounts always shows "nobarrier" option for xfs, even when mounted with "barrier"

2010-01-21 Thread Tom Georgoulias
mounts /dev/vg1/homexfs /mnt xfs rw,attr2,nobarrier,noquota 0 0 [r...@host ~]# mount | grep xfs /dev/mapper/vg1-homexfs on /mnt type xfs (rw,barrier) Can anyone else confirm this behavior? Thanks, Tom ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://l

Re: [CentOS] /proc/mounts always shows "nobarrier" option for xfs, even when mounted with "barrier"

2010-01-21 Thread Tom Georgoulias
On 01/21/2010 04:13 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Tom Georgoulias > wrote: > >> Ran into a confusing situation today. When I mount an xfs >> filesystem on >> a server running centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5, the >>

[CentOS] Trying to rebuild srpm from fedora....

2010-01-31 Thread Tom Bishop
So I am trying to rebuild this source rpm from fedora 10, shutter-0.85.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -its a screen capture application ( http://shutter-project.org/ ) that I have been unable to find in any repos, although it is in the fedora repos. Thought I would give it a go and try to rebuild the rpm, so he

Re: [CentOS] Trying to rebuild srpm from fedora....

2010-02-01 Thread Tom Diehl
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Tom Bishop wrote: > So I am trying to rebuild this source rpm from fedora > 10, shutter-0.85.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -its a screen capture application ( > http://shutter-project.org/ ) that I have been unable to find in any repos, > although it is in the fedora repo

Re: [CentOS] Trying to rebuild srpm from fedora....

2010-02-01 Thread Tom Bishop
Thanks for the suggestions I will give mock a go and see what happenswill need to go read up and understand what mock is doing though On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Tom Diehl wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Tom Bishop wrote: > > > So I am trying to rebuild this source rpm

Re: [CentOS] Trying to rebuild srpm from fedora....

2010-02-01 Thread Tom Bishop
.tar filesany help or pointing in the right direction would be appreciated. I know what I need to do to the spec file just not sure how to achieve it...thanks. On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Ryan Wagoner wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: > > Thanks for t

Re: [CentOS] Trying to rebuild srpm from fedora....

2010-02-01 Thread Tom Bishop
-itsupport/usr/share/applications/shutter.desktop Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/applications/centos5-shutter.desktop On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: > > Thanks for the tips so I have go

Re: [CentOS] Trying to rebuild srpm from fedora....

2010-02-01 Thread Tom Bishop
Here is the section of the spec file: %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}* %{_datadir}/pixmaps/ %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/%{name}.* it appears to be coverd... On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Clint Dilks wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] Trying to rebuild srpm from fedora....

2010-02-01 Thread Tom Bishop
Im just not seeing it, prolly staring me right in the face...attached is the .spec file On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:33 PM, Tom Bishop wrote: > > Here is the section of the spec file: > > > %{_bindir}/%{name} > > %{_data

Re: [CentOS] Trying to rebuild srpm from fedora....

2010-02-01 Thread Tom Bishop
Thanks Russ, I saw all the deps on their page, I guess I'll stop beating my head against the wall...lol ;) On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:14 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > This CentOS wiki will help you: > > > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM > > > > Ak

[CentOS] Find and excluding directory

2010-02-02 Thread Tom Brown
Hi I have to use find to change the perms of a directory and files within that directory recursively but i need to exclude a directory within the top level directory, as its a netapp and so contains a read only .snapshot dir. I have tried... # find /var/data/foo -path '\.\/\.snapshot' -prune

Re: [CentOS] Find and excluding directory

2010-02-02 Thread Tom Brown
o used "+" as the terminator. That's just an efficiency issue. It > makes 'find' build command lines with as many matches as will fit rather > than invoking 'chown' separately for each one. > > Hi Robert many thanks - that resolved ths issue f

Re: [CentOS] Virtualization - what do You recommend?

2010-02-02 Thread Tom Bishop
So I have tried and used most, I am anxious to see redhats next version of KVM stuff that will make it into rhel 6, whenever that is, once the management tools on LINUX catch up I will be moving towards that. I am currently using vmware server 2 on centos 5.4 and while there were some issues there

[CentOS] Anyone using Active Driectory auth with Centos 5.4.....?

2010-02-08 Thread Tom Bishop
Setting up a new backuppc for a small group of device and I am running centos 5.4 with winbind setup and working. Everything is working and I would like the users to authenicate using their AD creds and was wondering what folks are using to do that with apache 2.2 and centos 5.4. I know about mod

Re: [CentOS] Anyone using Active Driectory auth with Centos 5.4.....?

2010-02-09 Thread Tom Bishop
now if it helps. > > On 2/8/10, Tom Bishop wrote: > > Setting up a new backuppc for a small group of device and I am running > > centos 5.4 with winbind setup and working. Everything is working and I > > would like the users to authenicate using their AD creds and was > won

Re: [CentOS] Anyone using Active Driectory auth with Centos 5.4.....?

2010-02-09 Thread Tom Bishop
> AuthzLDAPUserKey sAMAccountName > AuthzLDAPUserScopesubtree > AuthzLDAPGroupBase"CN=Users,DC=example,DC=com" > AuthzLDAPGroupKey cn > AuthzLDAPGroupScope subtree > AuthzLDAPMemberKeymember > AuthzLDAPSetGroupAuth ldapdn > require group managers

Re: [CentOS] Anyone using Active Driectory auth with Centos 5.4.....?

2010-02-09 Thread Tom Bishop
Point taken and I do understand, in reality I would rather have nothing to do with MS which is insecure from the start, ever try to firewall an SBS 2003 install, good luck, they recommend turning it off, go figurelol On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >This looks like

Re: [CentOS] Anyone using Active Driectory auth with Centos 5.4.....?

2010-02-09 Thread Tom Bishop
I just need something for apache auth. I have winbind working just fine for the other stuff...Thanks On 2/9/10, Jay Leafey wrote: > If you are using AD for JUST authentication and not user information, > you can use the PAM Kerberos stuff. We've been using it for a couple of > years from both Ce

Re: [CentOS] Anyone using Active Driectory auth with Centos 5.4.....?

2010-02-11 Thread Tom Bishop
I was able to get ldap auth working fairly easily, although getting SSL to work took a little bit more effort due to trying to get the ca.cert from the SBS server On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > Em 10-02-2010 00:43, Tom Bishop escreveu: > > I

[CentOS] CentOS 4.6 - dhcp issue

2008-04-16 Thread Tom Brown
Hi - On my CentOS 4 cobbler server i am having some odd dhcp issues. There is only 1 dhcp server on the network and the cobbler box manages the dhcp. When i kick off the PXE install during the PXE phase things seem OK then when anaconda tried to get an IP sometimes things work out fine and oth

Re: [CentOS] Edit to change startup from SMP to not so SMP

2008-04-17 Thread Tom Brown
I have an issue on a server that stops to ask SMP or not so SMP on bootup. Its a pain as its a remote unit, and if I update (or the power goes out for 3 hours) the server will not restart I remember back in the day editing a start up file to tell it what kernel to start... Is that the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.6 - dhcp issue

2008-04-17 Thread Tom Brown
these are not virtual machines? the cobbler server is (currently) a VM yes - the clients are not. Why should that make any difference? thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Edit to change startup from SMP to not so SMP

2008-04-17 Thread Tom Brown
Ok, it was grub, and this is what I have.. I see default=0 how should I change that to one of the items below Thanks, default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title CentOS (2.6.9-42.0.2.EL) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL ro

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.6 - dhcp issue

2008-04-17 Thread Tom Brown
Tom Brown wrote: these are not virtual machines? the cobbler server is (currently) a VM yes - the clients are not. Why should that make any difference? actually in that example the client was also a VM i remember now - but the symptoms are the same on 'real' client

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.6 - dhcp issue

2008-04-17 Thread Tom Brown
Apr 16 14:25:53 cobbler dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.12.212 (192.168.12.117) from 00:0c:29:16:f8:b5 via eth0: Any hint where that (192.168.12.117) comes from? I see that you have the same on your successful conversation, though. Is there a chance you have two DHCP servers on the LAN?

Re: [CentOS] libg++.so.2.7.2.8 available for CentOS 4.5 ?

2008-04-23 Thread Tom Brown
We have a legacy app and i need to find *libg++.so.2.7.2.8 in a package for CentOS 4.5 - I can only find this library in a package for RH 7.x and this cane be installed as it conflicts with stuff from compat-libstdc++-296 which we also need.* ** *Any ideas ?* ** *thanks* ** sorry

[CentOS] libg++.so.2.7.2.8 available for CentOS 4.5 ?

2008-04-23 Thread Tom Brown
Hi We have a legacy app and i need to find *libg++.so.2.7.2.8 in a package for CentOS 4.5 - I can only find this library in a package for RH 7.x and this cane be installed as it conflicts with stuff from compat-libstdc++-296 which we also need.* ** *Any ideas ?* ** *thanks* ** ___

Re: [CentOS] libg++.so.2.7.2.8 available for CentOS 4.5 ?

2008-04-23 Thread Tom Brown
Can't you just extract the required lib(s) from the older RPM? i can - i just wondered if there was a package - From all searching it seems not though so i will solve it another way. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.

[CentOS] tomcat5 - RHEL4.5 - CentOS 4.5

2008-04-24 Thread Tom Brown
Hi I am seeing this issue on a RHEL4 box but i presume that the same will be for CentOS4.5 I am trying to get tomcat5 up and running using only upstream rpm's, as opposed to own rolled like i have done before, and hitting this issue. I have JAVA_HOME set in /etc/tomcat5/tomcat5.conf and als

Re: [CentOS] tomcat5 - RHEL4.5 - CentOS 4.5

2008-04-24 Thread Tom Brown
WARNING: unable to set your JAVA_HOME. This may cause problems for any java applications you run --- I am : tomcat on hostname JAVA_HOME : /usr/jdk1.3.1_08 Any ideas why this is and where that JAVA_HO

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >