On 09/27/2012 11:01 AM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> On 09/26/2012 11:57 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>
>> On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wr
On 09/27/2012 09:47 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> On 09/27/2012 11:01 AM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>>
>> On 09/26/2012 11:57 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
&
On 10/03/2012 08:46 AM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
>>
> I was under the impression that you are running a FTP server inside
> and were facing problems with the incoming traffic for the same. If
> you are primarily concerned with the outgoing traffic through two ISP
> links, please follow the following
On 10/09/2012 05:36 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 05:24 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 09/27/2012 06:36 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> I was trying to figure out what criteria to use to mark the connection.
>>> FTP is such a
>>> braindead applicati
Hello,
I have the following setup on linux 2.6.32... CentOS 6.x :
ipsec tunnel eth0-10.255.3.254/25 - eth1-pub add1 <-> eth1-pub add2 -
eth0-10.255.5.254/25
I am trying to SNAT remote private address 10.255.5.128/25 packets when
they come out of the ipsec tunnel to make it appear like it was fro
Never mind. I got it to work. I already had the ping going when I added the
iptables SNAT rule,
conntracking or route caching made it not work. I stopped the ping for a minute
or so then
restarted it and it worked and did the SNATing as I expected.
On 10/13/2012 06:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote
On 06/07/2016 04:46 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley wrote:
I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network
connections are static.
There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one big
one is that the 'network
Hello,
I've found it is helpful to limit the length of the packet you are capturing by
using
something like -s 256.
On 08/14/2016 06:04 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On 14/08/16 12:20, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
Hi folks,
I've discovered something. See below:
The packet rate is also not that high.
On 10/27/2016 09:43 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Il 27/10/2016 13:58, Leonard den Ottolander ha scritto:
Hi,
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 11:25 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
That's the line you are look
Hello,
Can someone explain why a static library would make calls to dlopen?
openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64
/usr/lib64/libcrypto.a
In trying to staticly link against the above I get
/usr/lib64/libcrypto.a(fips.o): In function `verify_checksums':
(.text+0x62b): undefined reference to `
On 02/02/2017 10:12 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
-Original Message-
From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Matt
Garman
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 8:52 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Spotty internet connection
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:13 PM, TE Dukes
On 02/03/2017 01:23 PM, Matt Garman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:08 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
for Comcast/Xfinity, I'm using a Arris SB6183 that I got at Costco. this
is a simple modem/bridge, so /my/ router behind it gets the public IP.
Note that some residential ISPs may not offer "nake
On 03/08/2017 05:43 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
> On 08/03/17 10:38, John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote:
>>
>>> ifconfig enp0s25 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
>>> route add default gw 192.168.0.254 enp0s25
>>> echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf
>>> echo namese
On 03/08/2017 05:52 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
>> Not really, Redhat/Centos has a lot to offer, but for me, networking is a
>> one-time configuration, and the best way to configure it is using something
>> that falls within this principle:
>>
>> https://e
On 03/08/2017 07:39 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Steve Clark wrote:
>
>> Yes it is really hard!
>>
>> ip address add 192.168.0.1/24 dev enp0s25
>> ip route add default via 192.168.0.254 dev enp0s25
>> echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.
On 04/09/2017 04:30 AM, J Martin Rushton wrote:
> On 09/04/17 05:39, Anthony K wrote:
>> According to "Arthur Schopenhauer":
>>
>> "All truth passes through three stages.
>> First, it is ridiculed.
>> Second, it is violently opposed.
>> Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
> Al
On 04/10/2017 05:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/10/2017 1:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> In what universe are those "consistant" device names, as opposed to
>> eth[0...]? And how could it help automated scripts that you can run on
>> *any* system you're administering?
> if I have a Intel gi
Hi,
Where is the source rpm for firefox-52 I can't seem to find it googling for it.
Thanks,
Steve
On 04/21/2017 08:00 AM, centos-announce-requ...@centos.org wrote:
> Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
> centos-annou...@centos.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
Sorry for the noise I found it.
On 04/21/2017 08:56 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where is the source rpm for firefox-52 I can't seem to find it googling for
> it.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> On 04/21/2017 08:00 AM, centos-announce-requ...@centos.org wrote:
>
Hello,
How do I allow root log in on GDM.
The only people that have access are admins - so I am not worried about
someone screwing things up.
Thanks,
--
Stephen Clark
Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this transmission
may contain privileged and confidential and/or pr
On 4/8/21 3:50 PM, Tony Schreiner wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 2:33 PM Nicolas Kovacs
<mailto:i...@microlinux.fr> wrote:
Le 08/04/2021 à 18:58, Steve Clark via CentOS a écrit :
How do I allow root log in on GDM.
tl;dr: you don't.
Log in as a non-root user, and when you d
On 4/9/21 11:31 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 4/9/21 5:18 AM, Steve Clark via CentOS wrote:
On 4/8/21 3:50 PM, Tony Schreiner wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 2:33 PM Nicolas Kovacs
<mailto:i...@microlinux.fr><mailto:i...@microlinux.fr><mailto:i...@microlinux.fr>
wrote:
Le
Hi List,
I see on CentOS 7 it has log4j-1.2.17...
Is ok 2 use. I know the CVE was against 2.0 fwd but not knowing if something
was backported to 1.2 ?
Thanks,
Steve
--
Stephen Clark
NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.
Sr. Applications Architect
Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contai
On 12/14/21 8:07 AM, Steve Meier wrote:
Hello Steve,
Am 2021-12-14 13:42, schrieb Steve Clark via CentOS:
Hi List,
I see on CentOS 7 it has log4j-1.2.17...
Is ok 2 use. I know the CVE was against 2.0 fwd but not knowing if
something was backported to 1.2 ?
Thanks,
Steve
log4j Version 1.2
Hi List,
does anyone use the lux repo. I needed
perl-Mail-POP3Client-2.19-5.el7.noarch.rpm except for el8, it was in epel for
el7
only place I found it was at
repo.iotti.biz/CentOS/8/noarch/perl-Mail-POP3Client-2.19-1.el8.lux.noarch.rpm
Thanks,
Steve
Email Confidentiality Notice: The informati
301 - 325 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
