Re: [CentOS] How to display the IP on the welcome screen

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Sorin Srbu >Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:12 AM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to display the IP on the welcome screen > >

Re: [CentOS] How to display the IP on the welcome screen

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Sorin Srbu >Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:20 AM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to display the IP on the welcome screen > >>

Re: [CentOS] Centos-release srpm

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Karanbir Singh >Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:32 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos-release srpm > >Should get fixed for 5.5 :) > >I've just built the rpm for cen

[CentOS] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5

oblem with. All others I've updated to v5.5 so far have worked w/o a hitch as upgrades go. Thanks for any help. -- BW, Sorin ------- # Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer] # Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone:

Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Mogens Kjaer >Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 10:54 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5 > >On 05/17/2

Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of cornel panceac >Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 10:59 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5 > > I'm getting a segmentation

Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Sorin Srbu >Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 11:22 AM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5 > >

[CentOS] [Solved] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Sorin Srbu >Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 11:29 AM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault when updating to CentOS v5.5 > >&

Re: [CentOS] [WTA] Automatically blocking on failed login

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of David Suhendrik >Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 6:55 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: [CentOS] [WTA] Automatically blocking on failed login > >Hello All, >I had problems with the security

Re: [CentOS] [WTA] Automatically blocking on failed login

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Mr Gabriel >Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 9:34 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] [WTA] Automatically blocking on failed login > >Maybe he should go with Centos based solution

Re: [CentOS] [WTA] Automatically blocking on failed login

>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Tom Yates >Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 11:19 AM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] [WTA] Automatically blocking on failed login > >if this is of interest to you i wrote it the

Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Niki Kovacs > Sent: den 11 december 2014 08:55 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6? > > I just spent a couple of unnerving hours trying to make Dropbox work

Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Niki Kovacs > Sent: den 11 december 2014 11:32 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6? > > Le 11/12/2014 10:58, Liam O'Toole a écrit : > > That procedure

Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Niki Kovacs > Sent: den 15 december 2014 07:28 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6? > > I just tested this on a fresh installation of CentOS 6.6 (in > Vi

Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 15 december 2014 11:12 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6? > > > I just tested this on a fresh ins

Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Chris > Sent: den 15 december 2014 19:57 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6? > > On 12/15/2014 12:52 PM, Sorin Srbu wrot

[CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

Hi all, Just switched my home computer from Windows 7 to CentOS 6.6 and I'm having a slight bit of trouble with the bittorrent-clients. * Transmission is fine but lacks "a bit" in features. * Vuze is my preferred bt-client but gives me horrendous gfx-artifacts, like not showing the torrent na

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

Isn't that a KDE-specific program? Works with Gnome as well? //Sorin Sent from my tablet, please excuse the brevity. Alexandru Chiscan wrote: ktorrent Lec ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

With ktorrent? No idea. Didn't even think of checking that one out. //Sorin Sent from my tablet, please excuse the brevity. Jeff Allison wrote: What's missing? On 28/12/2014 8:30 pm, "Alexandru Chiscan" wrote: > ktorrent > > Lec > > ___ > CentOS ma

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

ed packages for Deluge in my nux-dextop repo if it helps you. Also check rtorrent out. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Sorin Srbu" > To: "(centos@centos.org)" > Sent: Sunday, 28 De

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

__ From: centos-boun...@centos.org [centos-boun...@centos.org] on behalf of Jeff Allison [jeff.alli...@allygray.2y.net] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 14:11 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients No I meant Transmission. On 28 December 2014 at 22:15, Sorin Srbu wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] Bittorrent clients

Later Deluge versions seem to need a newer python than available in CentOS-Base.repo. 8-/ I'm not sure I dare replace the current python, as I believe yum is dependent on python. Maybe I'll just stick with Transmission and the Deluge from Epel. Thanks guys for your hints and help for now! -- /S

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

Hey, ktorrent looks pretty good! Thanks for the hint! -- /Sorin From: centos-boun...@centos.org [centos-boun...@centos.org] on behalf of Alexandru Chiscan [l...@easterng.ro] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 10:30 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentO

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

: Bittorrent clients My versions quite old but you can change the sort order to all of those things, the trackers etc are visible in the inspector. There's no columns, but it's not that kind of GUI. On 29 December 2014 at 00:47, Sorin Srbu wrote: > Oh, well, there's no coulmns

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

ktop managers provided that you install the required libraries. The same is true for gnome programs. LEC ----- Reply message - From: "Sorin Srbu" To: "Centos" Subject: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients Date: Sun, Dec 28, 2014 13:14 Isn't that a KDE-specific program

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Alexandru Chiscan > Sent: den 28 december 2014 16:22 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients > > >Hey, ktorrent looks pretty good! >Thanks for the hint!

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Eliezer Croitoru > Sent: den 28 december 2014 16:25 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Just wo

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Martin Cigorraga > Sent: den 28 december 2014 18:44 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients > > Did you try Transmission? You can install just the daemon

Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid LSI Megaraid not working since Centos 6.6

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE > Sent: den 14 januari 2015 14:16 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid LSI Megaraid not working since Centos > 6.6 > > Le 05/01/2015

Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam-ldapd, kerberos, etc)

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: den 21 januari 2015 05:47 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam- > ldapd, kerberos, etc) > > On 0

Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam-ldapd, kerberos, etc)

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Fred Smith > Sent: den 21 januari 2015 15:35 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam- > ldapd, kerberos, etc) > > > > > Befor

Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam-ldapd, kerberos, etc)

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Fred Smith > Sent: den 21 januari 2015 16:35 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam- > ldapd, kerberos, etc) > > > > Can't s

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6 > its been withdrawn upstream. > > given the level of interest

Re: [CentOS] Nvidia Mod Update

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Ned Slider > Sent: den 8 februari 2015 12:12 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia Mod Update > > Yes, just to reiterate: > > yum erase kmod-nvidia > yum install kmod-

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: den 7 maj 2015 19:09 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution > > my year of monthlies and month of dailies of 25 servers has be

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Timothy Murphy > Sent: den 7 maj 2015 23:21 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution > > >> The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: den 8 maj 2015 17:12 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution > > On 5/7/2015 11:44 PM, Sorin Srbu w

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 11 maj 2015 07:49 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution > > > Main Config: > >Sc

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: den 11 maj 2015 08:19 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution > > On 5/10/2015 11:03 PM, Sorin Srbu wr

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: den 11 maj 2015 09:25 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution > > On 5/10/2015 11:57 PM, Sorin Srb

Re: [CentOS] NUX Skype for Linux

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of James B. Byrne > Sent: den 16 juni 2015 14:55 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] NUX Skype for Linux > > I had cause to install the Skype for Linux package from the NUX repo. >

Re: [CentOS] NUX Skype for Linux

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: den 16 juni 2015 20:59 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] NUX Skype for Linux > > >> I had cause to install the Skype for Linux package from the N

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Max Pyziur > Sent: den 28 juni 2015 20:50 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home > server > > I'm rebuilding a machine to function

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 29 juni 2015 08:11 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home > server > &

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: den 29 juni 2015 08:29 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home > server > > O

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: den 29 juni 2015 09:03 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home > server > > O

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of James B. Byrne > Sent: den 29 juni 2015 15:10 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home > server > > > > Please note: I'm not

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: den 29 juni 2015 17:25 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home > server > > > The WiFi solution I us

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

> On 06/29/2015 06:46 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > Even considering a minimal CentOS install, is that still less minimal > > than e.g. Smoothwall or Ipcop? > > Yes, a minimal install of CentOS is probably larger (less minimal) than a > specialized distribution. > > > In

Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of ken > Sent: den 20 augusti 2015 19:27 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray > > I'm suprised no one yet has mentioned authoring movies. Maybe th

Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Chris Yereaztian > Sent: den 21 augusti 2015 10:29 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray > > Sorin, authoring a movie usually refers to actually c

Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Chris Yereaztian > Sent: den 21 augusti 2015 19:53 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray > > Ken, I'm sorry, I had no intention of fighting anyone

Re: [CentOS] Oracle java RPM

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu > Sent: den 4 september 2015 21:22 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Oracle java RPM > > On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 16:16 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome Issues on CentOS 6

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Tim Evans > Sent: den 20 oktober 2015 14:46 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome Issues on CentOS 6 > > > I was seeing issues like that on centos-7 with a coup

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome Issues on CentOS 6

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Richard > Sent: den 20 oktober 2015 18:52 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome Issues on CentOS 6 > > On a centos-7 machine where I was having this issue, upda

[CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

gle Chrome on CentOS and how to get around this problem? Are the views on this matter still infected? I'm not looking forward to go back to the sluggish Firefox. 8-/ -- BW, Sorin --- # Sorin Srbu, Sysadmin # Uppsala Unive

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John Hodrien > Sent: den 24 januari 2016 12:47 > To: CentOS mailing list > Cc: Mark LaPierre > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent > > My opinion is that there's a silent majority wh

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Richard > Sent: den 25 januari 2016 16:19 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6? > > > You're just seeing this now on a 6.7 system? I don't believ

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Leon Fauster > Sent: den 25 januari 2016 17:03 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6? > > > upstream provide a EL6 supplementary repository with c

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Peter Duffy > Sent: den 26 januari 2016 13:16 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent > > reminds me of first installing windows 95 (by the > choice of my then

Re: [CentOS] In A UEFI World, "rm -rf /" Can Brick Your System

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: den 1 februari 2016 20:34 > To: CentOS > Subject: [CentOS] In A UEFI World, "rm -rf /" Can Brick Your System > > As a public service announcement, recursively r

Re: [CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of EGO-II.1 > Sent: den 9 februari 2016 09:00 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk > > > > >> the only truly safe way to destroy data on m

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John Hodrien > Sent: den 29 februari 2016 17:55 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > > Fully updated 7.2 system. I installed the corr

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: den 29 februari 2016 19:50 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > Because I was looking late Friday afternoon,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Akemi Yagi > Sent: den 3 mars 2016 08:20 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Akemi Yagi > Sent: den 10 mars 2016 20:27 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > > > > Looks like installing openshot 2.x on C7 isn't as trivi

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Chris Beattie > Sent: den 11 mars 2016 16:53 > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > On 3/11/2016 2:02

Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of g > Sent: den 24 mars 2016 16:56 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ? > > if you have a file in profile directory, add this to it. if not, > cre

Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of g > Sent: den 24 mars 2016 17:22 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ? > > > now i goofed. :-\ > > > if you have file "user.js" in profile

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 14 mars 2016 07:31 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > > >>> Looks like in

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

ttp://appimage.org/ > So the appimage did not work on EL6? > > Anyway, hope to see more apps like this. :-) > Big win for the users usability wise, not sure how security will be impacted. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nux! > Sent: den 7 april 2016 15:04 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > Well, by the looks of it, it bundles all the deps in one archive,

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Lamar Owen > Sent: den 7 april 2016 16:21 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > It does take more disk space to do this. > > And while I ha

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nux! > Sent: den 7 april 2016 18:09 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > Indeed, it's pretty new AFAIK and I am as surprised Openshot are u

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Phelps, Matthew > Sent: den 18 april 2016 14:34 > To: Karanbir Singh > Cc: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6? > > Have you, as the CentOS project

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: Dell GX270 fails to power down (but reboots)

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Traut Sent: den 8 november 2012 10:42 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: Dell GX270 fails to power down (but reboots) >I looked at the capacitors, they seem good, n

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johan Scheepers Sent: den 28 november 2012 08:10 To: centos Subject: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection >Installed Centos 6.3 live-cd. Looking good but * no internet >conn

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Johan Scheepers > Sent: den 30 november 2012 19:09 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection > > I am a pensionar and have lots of time.

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Johan Scheepers > Sent: den 1 december 2012 10:05 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection > > Good day to Sorin and Earl, > > Apprecia

Re: [CentOS] gftp ?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz > Sent: den 7 december 2012 14:29 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] gftp ? > > Centos 6.3 > > Just tried to install gftp, and no package found. > > Where is

Re: [CentOS] Happy new years everyone

fred smith skrev: >> Everyone, have a great and safe new years. See you all in 2013. > >KB: > >My thanks to you and all the other team members who make Centos happen! +1. Many thanks to the CentOS-team, as well as this list for turning-point help over the year. It has been invaluable. Wish you

Re: [CentOS] Large yum update

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Tony Molloy > Sent: den 19 januari 2013 10:43 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Large yum update > > Yep CentOS 5.9 was released on thursday. 100+ package updates > depe

Re: [CentOS] Dell Precision M6700 with centos 5?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Eero Volotinen > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 8:39 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] Dell Precision M6700 with centos 5? > > any experiences with centos 5/rhel 5 insta

[CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps?

I see Johnny Hughes has released CR-updates for CentOS 6. Is CentOS 6.4 brewing yet then? 8-) -- BW, Sorin --- # Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer] # Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 >3 sign

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nux! > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 10:23 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps? > > On 28.02.2013 08:31,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Johnny Hughes > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 6:46 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 in the making perhaps? > > > Is CentOS 6.4 brewing yet then? 8-) >

Re: [CentOS] acrobat reader for x86_64?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Fred Smith > Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 5:03 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] acrobat reader for x86_64? > > Adobe doesn't seem to have acroread for x86_64 linux, or a

Re: [CentOS] acrobat reader for x86_64?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 4:29 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] acrobat reader for x86_64? > > Adobe *does* have a 64-bit repo. Install it as fo

Re: [CentOS] How's 5.10 coming along?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Jim Perrin > Sent: den 14 oktober 2013 22:04 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] How's 5.10 coming along? > > > Just wondering how the build of 5.10 is coming along. Is the

[CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server

aidcontroller?), would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. -- BW, Sorin --- # Sorin Srbu, Sysadmin # Uppsala University # Dept of Medicinal Chemistry # Div of Org Pharm Chem # Box 574 # SE-75123 Uppsala # Sweden# # Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 #

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server

> -Original Message- > From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net] > Sent: den 4 november 2013 13:48 > To: CentOS mailing list; Sorin Srbu > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server > > Am 04.11.2013 13:44, schrieb Sorin Srbu: > > I&#

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nux! > Sent: den 4 november 2013 14:02 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server > > Please check this page, if you have the driver from the man

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: den 4 november 2013 18:06 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server > > > Any hints as to where to start reading up, as

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John R Pierce > Sent: den 4 november 2013 18:08 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server > > On 11/4/2013 4:44 AM, So

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Les Mikesell > Sent: den 4 november 2013 18:31 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server > > BackupPC pools data with hardlinks so you have to

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Keith Keller > Sent: den 4 november 2013 20:19 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server > > > What about this 1 GB RAM per TB disk-space for XFS

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > Sent: den 4 november 2013 22:30 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server > > In that case it might be better to switch t

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of SilverTip257 > Sent: den 5 november 2013 14:36 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server > > > > In that case it might be better to switch to XF

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Les Mikesell > Sent: den 5 november 2013 15:09 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server > > > Can e.g. BackupPC handle several file systems to

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: den 5 november 2013 15:35 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server > > > According to Wikipedia RHEL 7 is scheduled fo

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >