>-Original Message-
>If I send him a message directly, and put him in the CC line too, will it
>start a loop of auto-replies...?
>How about I set up an account somewhere (gmail..), turn on a vacation
>message , and then send him a message.
>Just thinking
>Dennis
You geeks have too
nnis
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:26 PM
>> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>> Subject: RE: [CentOS] Yogunluk
>>
>> >-Original
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Karanbir Singh
>Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 12:34 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Automatic site selection for dowload
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> Ok,
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>AnneWilson
>Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:21 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: [CentOS] Copy of own messages
>
>For some reason I'm no longer seeing copies of my own messages. I've checked
>http://lists
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Jacques B.
>Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:47 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages
>
>On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:20 AM, AnneWilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>> For some r
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Kai Schaetzl
>Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 2:58 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:37:37 +0200:
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Johnny Hughes
>Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 3:45 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>> -Original Messag
>-Original Message-
>> Actually, the calculation is that it needs a GB of RAM for every TB of
managed data.
How do you reckon this? Ie, what's the basic assumption(s) for the statement?
Parity calculations for stripes or what? I don't follow.
I can't say I've ever heard any such like, so
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Steve Thompson
>Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 8:39 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?
>
>
>A cheap server: there are many different values
>-Original Message-
>>> A cheap server: there are many different values of cheap; it all depends
>>> on what you need it for.
>>>
>>
>> Yupp, break down the requirements into the following three options:
>>
>> * Good
>> * Fast
>> * Cheap
>>
>> Pick any *two*. You can never ever have all thr
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Rainer Duffner
>Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 12:27 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?
>
Actually, the calculation is that it needs a
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>MHR
>Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 3:14 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crashes on
dual-PIII
>Compaq ProLiant 3000
>
>> I have an Athlon 64 X2 4200+,
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>nate
>Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:12 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?
>
>Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
>Grow data online, convert between RAID
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Matt Hyclak
>Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:01 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
>
>> When I read the first part of the message, I had to check th
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Akemi Yagi
>Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:30 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
>
>> And who might this "revered" Jim Perrin be? Obviously he seem
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Stephen John Smoogen
>Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:46 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>
> He certainly is. Jim sweeps the floors for CentOS.
>
>And not very well.. bloody gum stuck to my shoe every tim
t; On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Sorin Srbu
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > And who might this "revered" Jim Perrin be? Obviously he seems to be some
kind
>> > of big cheese, but what does he do etc?
>>
>> He certainly is. J
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>John R Pierce
>Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 10:59 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> An
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Jim Perrin
>Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:02 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Floorsweepers (Was: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
failure)
>
>On Tue, Jul 1
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Les Mikesell
>Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 3:32 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>MHR
>Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 5:56 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
>
>[Lots removed]
>What am I missing?
Did you get the latest drive
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>MJT
>Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 7:57 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
>
>On Tuesday 29 July 2008 9:55:50 pm MHR wrote:
>> I just put
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>MHR
>Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:55 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
>
>I used to be able to fool s-c-d into using a generic CRT,
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Shawn Everett
>Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:07 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] Modem network card conflict
>
>If I flush the firewall rules: iptables -F
>Bring down the eth0 interface: if
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>MHR
>Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:36 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
>
>> About that generic CRT, have you by any chance tried gene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>MHR
>Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:59 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
>
>On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL P
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>MHR
>Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 7:06 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
>
>On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 a
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>MHR
>Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 7:08 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
>
>> Also, do you have a way to connect the monitor to a compu
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>MHR
>Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:05 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen - SOLVED
>
>Thanks to Ritesh Khadgaray:
>
>> Is there anything I'm
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of William Hooper
Sent: den 17 januari 2012 22:41
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] anyone doing automatic yum updates via yum-updatesd on
production servers?
>I would like to expa
AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>> I would like to expand on this a little. Once you get a certain
>>> number of machine it probably makes sense to have your own internal
>>> mirror.
>>
>> Is there any particular approximate number of machines you'd say
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: den 18 januari 2012 11:14
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] anyone doing automatic yum updates via yum-updatesd on
production servers?
On 01/18/2012 01:01 A
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Karanbir Singh
Sent: den 18 januari 2012 12:16
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] anyone doing automatic yum updates via yum-updatesd on
production servers?
On 01/18/2012 11:00 A
AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>> ideally a large number of machines, and a reasonable local connection
>>> with the ability to schedule and manage updates being applied on the
>>> machines ( so, rules out hosting setups )
>>
>> I might be interested, it depends
.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=22483>>, where
it's suggested one use yum-updatesd instead.
Is this still true? Should one avoid yum-cron if using CentOS 5?
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysa
Another smooth update. Thanks CentOS-team!
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 >3 signals> GSM
# Div of Org Pharm Chem,Mobile:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Toralf Lund
Sent: den 8 mars 2012 11:36
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Thunderbird and Firefox 10 font rendering
Does anyone else experience this? Any idea how to fix it (besides
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Toralf Lund
Sent: den 8 mars 2012 12:40
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird and Firefox 10 font rendering
BTW, besides the bluryness, the fonts also look thinner somehow;
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of fred smith
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 07:17
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 11:15:29AM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Hi,
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 08:54
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5
On 03/08/12 11:44 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> I know there might be s
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 10:17
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5
mostly, numerical scientific processing, and various sorts of multime
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 10:34
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5
On 03/09/12 1:28 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> 3D animation rendering
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Peter Kjellström
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 11:05
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5
> I know there might be some negative performance issues with certa
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of William L. Maltby
>Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 8:37 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem
>
>> The monitor is OK as it's atta
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Kaplan, Andrew H.
>Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:24 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: [CentOS] Network Install Procedure Question
>
>I wanted to do a netinstall of the 5.3 release, and
nnect the power connector to the
CentOS drive, the Windows installer happily goes on.
Is this to be expected, that Windows won't install if it sees a hd with
another OS as master?
Thanks for any hints.
--
BW,
Sorin
----
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Robert Heller
>Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 5:03 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Cc: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-booting CentOS and WinXP
>
>> > The most curious thing happ
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Sorin Srbu
>Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 8:48 AM
>To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dual-booting CentOS and WinXP
>
>Thanks for the confir
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:24 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Solved: Dual-booting CentOS and WinXP
>
>Note that it is also possible to set up VMware and
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of William L. Maltby
>Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 5:38 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Solved: Dual-booting CentOS and WinXP
>
>> * Install a new hd and jumper it as primary
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of William L. Maltby
>Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 11:32 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Solved: Dual-booting CentOS and WinXP
>
>> >I think for maximum performance, if you h
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Robert Heller
>Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 6:20 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Cc: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
>
>> It seems to me that CentOS
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Frank Cox
>Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 6:22 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Cc: Anne Wilson
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
>
>> It seems to me that CentOS would be pe
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Lanny Marcus
>Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:28 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
>
>Possibly the best way is for the updates to be setu
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of John Kennedy
>Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:34 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Cc: Anne Wilson
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
>
>As much as I like CentOS, I tend to
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Lanny Marcus
>Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:14 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
>
>Probably not the best distro for Laptops,
>but many
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of William L. Maltby
>Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:24 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
>
>> >Probably not the best distro for Laptops,
>> >b
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Robert Heller
>Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:52 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Cc: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
>
>The *Intel* WiFi-NIC (Intel
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of William L. Maltby
>Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 3:27 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
>
>
>> Ok, so what would you guys suggest using on a
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Robert Heller
>Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 4:42 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Cc: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
>
>> The firmware you mention,
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Rob Kampen
>Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 4:15 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
>
>I have installed and used CentOS on laptops just fine. Th
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of JohnS
>Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 6:35 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?
>
>> Ok, so what would you guys suggest using on a laptop, if Cen
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Jerry Geis
>Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 3:26 PM
>To: CentOS ML
>Subject: [CentOS] yum update error this morning
>
>I am getting the following "yum update" error this morning. C 5.3 x86_6
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Ralph Angenendt
>Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 3:32 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] yum update error this morning
>
>> TypeError: unsubscriptable object
>
>What everybody
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Ralph Angenendt
>Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:22 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] yum update error this morning
>
>> I did a yum clean all as well, but it didn't help. U
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Jeff
>Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:41 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] Evolution Question?
>
>I have a CentOS 5.3 Desktop and use Evolution to read mailing lists .
>When i
't be
discussed on-list but want to hint me anyway.
Thanks.
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 >3 signals> GSM
# Div o
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Karanbir Singh
>Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 2:04 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Windows Vista Tablet PC linux alternative
>
>> Would any of you guys know of some k
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Tosh
>Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:47 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Windows Vista Tablet PC linux alternative
>
>The mentioned software by Karanbir :
>cellwriter
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Jeff
>Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 12:40 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Evolution Question?
>
>>> I have a CentOS 5.3 Desktop and use Evolution to read mailing lists .
>>
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Dave
>Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:23 AM
>To: centOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] nvidia dual monitor setup centos howto
>
>[...]
>yum install nvidia-x11-drv.x86_64
>
>[...]
>Which ver
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Dave
>Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:43 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] nvidia dual monitor setup centos howto
>
>>>Which versions of RH or FC correspond reasonably well
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
>Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:29 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] nvidia dual monitor setup centos howto
>
>just to clear things up: the nvidia driv
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Ralph Angenendt
>Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 1:15 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mailing List "mail forwarding loop"
>
>Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> I've been getting over th
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Spiro Harvey
>Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 1:49 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really
helpful
>
>> [...] and i would *seriously* a
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Geoff Galitz
>Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:16 AM
>To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really
helpful
>
>FWIW, I think we should lighte
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Robert P. J. Day
>Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:05 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really
helpful
>
>p.s. let me make it clear w
eally take upwards of a minute or so till the
NetworkManager says it's now connected??
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 >3
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:01 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really
helpful
>
>And there is always the issue tha
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Michael Semcheski
>Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:57 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful
>
>On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:1
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Robert P. J. Day
>Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 11:57 AM
>To: CentOS discussion list
>Subject: [CentOS] RHEL, centos and seeing if i now understand this
>
>
> ok, given the flurry of respon
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Bill Campbell
>Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 5:23 PM
>To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] link to "commercial support" page isn't really
helpful
>
>>With risk of splitting hairs
ry standpoint.
Thanks.
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 >3 signals> GSM
# Div of Org Pharm Chem,Mobile: +46 (0)701-718023
# Bo
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Rudi Ahlers
>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 11:33 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
> What web photo gallery software do you guys use?
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Anne Wilson
>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 11:36 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>> What web photo gallery software do you guys use?
>
>In th
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of luc...@lastdot.org
>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 12:24 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>>> What web photo gallery software do you guys use?
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Anne Wilson
>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 2:14 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>> Konqueror?? That's a new one. Will check it up. Depending
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 3:01 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>> It doesn't have to be available in a rpm-package, just av
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Greg Bailey
>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 5:03 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>> What web photo gallery software do you guys use?
>>
>> My
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of John Thomas
>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 5:17 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> What web
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of nate
>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 6:10 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>> My requir
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 11:08 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
It doesn't have to be available in a rpm-package, just
at 9:09 AM, nate wrote:
>>
>> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>
>> > My requirements are only that the software should be simple to install,
>> > maintain and add more photos. I'm not a pro (a newbie more like it...)
when
>> > it comes to mysql and php, so this need
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Rainer Duffner
>Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:38 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>I don't see why anybody on this mailing-list should be in
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Bart Schaefer
>Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:01 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:55 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>> Seems like I also did not mention it must be free, as in n
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Scott Silva
>Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 7:50 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options [Solved]
>
>> Anyway, I installed Gallery2 yesterday evening and fin
>-Original Message-
>From: Ray Leventhal [mailto:cen...@swhi.net]
>Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:32 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Cc: sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>Sorry for the late post on this thread, but there's free client called
>'Jalbum'
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of luc...@lastdot.org
>Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:24 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>jalbum is a hog with large collections.. performance mu
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of John R Pierce
>Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 7:02 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> Checked
101 - 200 of 659 matches
Mail list logo
