>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of Joshua Baker-LePain
>Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:47 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
>
>> By default, CentOS v5 requires
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of Rudi Ahlers
>Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:55 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
>
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of Tom H
>Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 1:03 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
>
>
>In our environment, leaving your desk without
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of John Hodrien
>Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 2:02 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
>
>>> I don't know the exact path but you c
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of Ross Walker
>Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 3:27 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Cc: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
>
>I wonder if ther
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of Joshua Baker-LePain
>Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:49 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
>
>I was going to leave this alone,
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of Mike McCarty
>Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:08 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
>
>OTOH, I have cats :-)
Funny you should
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:00 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos -
>ATH9K disaster
>
>About 5 years
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of Brian Mathis
>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:03 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos -
>ATH9K disaster
>
>CentOS is great f
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 >3 signals> GSM
# Div of Org Pharm Chem,Mobile: +46 (0)701-718023
# Box 574, Uppsala University, Fax: +46 (0)18-471448
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of compdoc
>Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:09 PM
>To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64
>
>>For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology prev
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of cpol...@surewest.net
>Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 5:02 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>&g
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>Behalf Of Sean
>Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 9:29 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] premature question on 5.6
>
>Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>>
>> You need to check ext4 is supported
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Tom H
>Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 6:26 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6
>
>> You have my permission to use something else. Does that help?
>
>Good answer!
"M
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Alain Péan
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:09 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>May I ask the develloppers if we can have some update about the statu
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:25 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>You beat me to it: *PLEASE* don't start this up again
I go
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Alain Péan
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:34 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Timothy Murphy
>Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:33 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>However, I don't think people who ask reasonable questions politely
>
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Robert Heller
>Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 3:25 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Cc: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] interview request for ppl who have Shockwave/.Firefox
>working
>
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of ken
>Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:02 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] about:plugins <-Re: interview request for ppl who have
>Shockwave/.Firefox working
>
>Under "Tools..."
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Yves Bellefeuille
>Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:38 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] interview request for ppl who have Shockwave/.Firefox
>working
>
>Anyway, did you dow
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Gilbert Sebenste
>Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 4:03 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 will not install due to Firefox error
>
>Any ideas? All the packages seem to b
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of David Sommerseth
>Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:42 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
>
>Which is why I'm investigating a migration to Scientific Linux.
[
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Ed Westphal
>Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 2:24 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] 5.6 update experience - EXCELLENT!
>
>Just updated 98 packages on this ole hardware raid 10 b
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Mathieu Baudier
>Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 5:22 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6
>
>(especially for focusing on 5.6 before 6.0)
Hear-here!
--
/Sorin
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Phil Schaffner
>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:55 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext4 support in anaconda?
>
>S.Tindall wrote on 04/10/2011 01:46 PM:
>> Just boot the inst
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Phil Schaffner
>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:55 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext4 support in anaconda?
>
>S.Tindall wrote on 04/10/2011 01:46 PM:
>> Just boot the inst
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 4:52 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6
>
>(In addition to the update, NO MORE "WHEN WILL 5.6 COME OUT?!?!?!?!?!!!"
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Torres, Giovanni (NIH/NINDS) [C]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 2:34 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
>
>On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:23 AM, Matt
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Lars Hecking
>Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:11 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
>
>
>> OTOH, gparted doesn't see my software raid array ei
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Matthew Feinberg
>Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 9:29 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
>
>Hardware or software raid. Is there an advantag
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Christopher Chan
>Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 3:45 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
>
>While we are at it, disks being directly connecte
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Christopher Chan
>Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 4:49 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
>
>>> While we are at it, disks being directly conne
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Christopher Chan
>Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 2:34 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
>>>
>>> Oh yeah, we are on PCIe and NUMA architecture
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Peter Kjellström
>Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 3:31 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
>
>On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 03:10:33 PM Lars Heckin
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of fakessh
>Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 8:17 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: [CentOS] the mirrors are still not updated
>
>
>hello centos network
>
>ads on the list centos-annonces Thurs
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Dick Roth
>Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 12:44 PM
>To: CentOS List
>Subject: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
>
>Good Morning--
>
>I'm looking to shore up security in my system and with comm
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of lheck...@users.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:29 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
>
>
>> IMO the default install of gpg is good enou
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of ML
>Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 9:46 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] [Slightly OT] Data Preservation
>
>HI All,
>
>So I have 5 1U servers (running Windows) that have Ultra
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of ML
>Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 11:42 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] How fast?
>
>How fast does a a small DNS Server need to be? I will have about 10
>servers and a few w
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Paul Heinlein
>Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:35 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] How fast?
>
>The bigger issue is ensuring that an older computer has enough disk
>spa
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of vijay shanker
>Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 8:47 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: [CentOS] My doubts with apache server on centos installation
>
>I am not able to understand what is th
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Torkil Zachariassen
>Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 7:39 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Security updates for Centos 5.3
>
>On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:11 -0500, slchavar
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Morten Torstensen
>Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:37 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] Missing yum-priorities in 5.4?
>
>Is this missing on purpose? Function merged with a
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Tony Molloy
>Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:32 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Missing yum-priorities in 5.4?
>
>The problem is not with updated systems but with newl
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 7:22 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Docx format ?
>
>Niki Kovacs wrote:
>> Roger asked:
>>>
>>> Is there any way I c
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of mark
>Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 5:44 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Docx format ?
>
>>> Open Office 3 will do it.
>>> Yep, as well as .xlsx
>>
>> What about Powe
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Sorin Srbu
>Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 9:22 AM
>To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Docx format ?
>
>>> What about Powerpoint pre
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of MHR
>Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 10:03 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Docx format ?
>
>On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Sorin Srbu w
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Alvaro Schneider Guevara
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:40 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Linux router with CentOS
Hello everybody.
I'm wondering here if is it possible to setup a CentOS machine a
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of KJS
>Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 6:16 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux router with CentOS
>
>PFSense or IPCop, IPCop is a little easier to configure IMO.
Is I
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann
>Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2009 11:22 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Deleting contents of /tmp on shutdown
>
>On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:05 PM,
>-Original Message-
>From: Eero Volotinen [mailto:eero.voloti...@iki.fi]
>Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:27 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list; Sorin Srbu
>Cc: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Deleting contents of /tmp on shutdown
>
>>> I ha
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Karanbir Singh
>Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 12:12 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] C5 updates?
>
>yes, and they seem to have - yet again - changed some major packages
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Karanbir Singh
>Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 12:46 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] C5 updates?
>
>On 12/14/2009 11:42 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
&g
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Lanny Marcus
>Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:53 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] OT: GNOME Panel Menu - Notification Area 2.16.1- operator
>error
>
>How can I get this GNO
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Lanny Marcus
>Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:51 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] SOLVED: Re: OT: GNOME Panel Menu - Notification Area
>2.16.1- operator error
>
>When I log
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Jussi Hirvi
>Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:07 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine
>
>What should I do to make an existing CentOS (5.4) disc boot up on
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Jussi Hirvi
>Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:39 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Old hd, new machine
>
>On 16.12.2009 12:16, Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of John R. Dennison
>Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 12:00 AM
>To: John R Pierce
>Cc: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Urgent request
>
>On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 02:37:52PM -0800
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Thomas Dukes
>Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 12:53 AM
>To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Urgent request
>
>We have backups but its only database files. C-Systems got u
,
Sorin
-------
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 >3 signals> GSM
# Div of Org Pharm Chem,Mobile: +46 (0)701-718023
# Box 574, Uppsala University, Fax: +46 (0)18-4714482
# SE-751 23 Uppsala,
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Barry Brimer
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:15 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>I use rsnapshot .. which manages sets of rsync backups using hardlin
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Max Hetrick
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:36 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>> Somewhat s
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:49 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>Between compression and pooling, I get about 10x the raw data being
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Alan McKay
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 3:01 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>BackupPC over here - very happy with it for Linux and Windoze, at home
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of John Doe
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:04 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>[...]
>If you need to run multiple Apache's for different services then
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Gabriel Rosca
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:09 PM
>To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>I like better Bacula ...
>
>Personal I have Bacula ... configure
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Gabriel Rosca
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:21 PM
>To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>They have open source
>
>www.bacula.org
My mistake. Thanks for t
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Brian Mathis
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:32 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>Do you currently need that disk space for something else?
No, I don
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Max Hetrick
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:39 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>The reason I really like BackupPC is the compression you can get. It
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:57 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>On 1/13/2010 9:08 AM, Gabriel Rosca wrote:
>>
>>
>> My google searches
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 5:17 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>> I've never had any problems with software raid5 in linux before, but
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of S.Tindall
>Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:30 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>So just use the stock epel package and you don't need to modify apache.
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Benjamin Franz
>Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:12 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>If you have any budget at all, invest in bigger drives. 7200 RPM 1
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 3:14 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>If you have any opportunity to change things, I'd get some larger dri
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 3:55 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>> I haven't got a budget really. Today I asked for a new group-printe
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Brian Mathis
>Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:07 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>[...]
> So you need to be able to walk the fine line
>between these t
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:48 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>Unfortunately, the only way commodity priced things get large scale
>re
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of nate
>Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:00 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>I still feel burned from IBM's 75GXP fiasco ~7 years ago, even
>joined the laws
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 3:14 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>Yes, but if you use the epel rpm, either mount it at /var/lib/BackupP
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Benjamin Franz
>Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 2:26 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>I was thinking about your long term here. Make sure to use LVM to
>c
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 2:42 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>The other question to ask is whether an offsite copy is needed. After
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Benjamin Franz
>Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 2:43 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>> With six drives installed, there is no more space to add more drive
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Les Mikesell
>Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 2:49 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
>You might want to join the mail lists:
>http://backuppc.sourceforge.net
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 5:14 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
>
I was thinking about your long term here. Make sure to use LVM
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Arturas Skauronas
>Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 6:50 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
Guys, BackupPC works like the proverbial charm.
Thank you very much
I did the upgrade dance with yum once when going from Fedora 5 to 7. It
worked, but took a lot of time and left a helluva' lot of obscure lib-failures
and stuff. I eventually got it working but I never felt sure it wouldn't fail
on me whenever. After running the upgraded system for a month or so w/
stest 4.6 -> 5.1 upgrade path
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Sorin Srbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did the upgrade dance with yum once when going from Fedora 5 to 7. It
> worked, but took a lot of time and left a helluva' lot of obscure
lib-failures
> and stuff. I eve
Something just occured to me on this this...
Suppose I have an old Amd 486DX2/40, could this oldie be setup so that it
boots a minimal (blocky) GUI over NFS to be able to run xmms or something like
that? Has anybody tried (something similar like) this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PRO
I realise linux distros are rather a "religious" matter where each
individual/user/sysadmin/whatever think that "their" particular distro is the
best. 8-)
With that said, in my case, chosing CentOS was actually a no-brainer, as our
department had already settled with RHEL3/4 for application rea
Everything was orangy, yellow or weird green in the 70s... ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:11 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [CentOS] School Server Setup]
MHR wrote:
>
7 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Re: [Fwd: Re: School Server Setup]
on 6-11-2008 10:45 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
> Everything was orangy, yellow or weird green in the 70s... ;-)
>
I think you took some of the bad acid! ;-P
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Toby Bluhm
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:24 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [CentOS] School Server Setup]
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> Everything was orangy, yellow or weird green in the 70s... ;-)
>
>
Throw in a little brown and you've de
I used Azureus. Worked fine. The image'll be used for new installs, for
already installed machines yum update works faster.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jerry Geis
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 6:58 PM
To: CentOS ML
Subject: [CentOS] bit
I got mine down at 10-12Mbps at work, and nearly as fast at home. And that was
yesterday when supposedly everybody and their dogs were downloading 5.2. OTOH,
that might be why it went so fast... 8-)
Are you sure your ISP doesn't cap/stop/whatever p2p generally? If you are,
what kind of settings ha
But... That's what the checksums are for. Don't you trust them?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rudi Ahlers
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:32 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] What torrent are y'all using?
Michael A. Pete
Why don't you clone your machine, or use Vmware or something, and do an test
before you do it with your production-machine? Asking this sort of question is,
well, rather meaningless IMO. Your setup is unique considering what tweaks you
might've done to it. YMMV as they say. What works for me, do
Ok, any particular reason why not?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:54 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Automatic site selection for dowload
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> There is n
What is this?? OOO-replies?
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 7:44 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Yogunluk: Yogunluk: Yogunluk: Yogunluk: [CentOS] Clamd not working
>
>Yogunlugumuza gore
1 - 100 of 659 matches
Mail list logo
