My apologies for posting an already solved problem, but dont know if its my
ignorance that is not getting me to my desired results.trying to mount
an external usb hard drive(ntfs) in my system.
In my CentOS box, I tried to install dkms, dkms-fuse, fuse and fuse-ntfs-3g
as follows(including wha
unt a different device under the /dev/mapper/ directory, (e.g.
/dev/mapper/nvidia_eahaabcc1). Please see the 'dmraid' documentation
for more details.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Justin Bull wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Sagar Koirala
> wrote:
> > My ap
And yes, this is the line from /etc/fstab file:
/dev/sdb1 /media/Expansion_Drive ntfs
pamconsole,fscontext=system_u:object_r:removable_t,exec,noauto,managed 0 0
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Sagar Koirala wrote:
> Thank you for your reply. I tried to give the mount comm
Now, I am getting the error messages as follows:
FATAL: Module fuse not found.
ntfs-3g-mount: fuse device is missing, try 'modprobe fuse' as root
Thanks for any help.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Sagar Koirala wrote:
> And yes, this is the line from /etc/fstab file:
I did yum update kernel-smp and rebooted the machine, and blops.the
drive opened!
Thanks for your help!
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:20, Sagar Koirala
> wrote:
> > ntfs-3g-mount: fuse device is missing,
I don't believe there are people like me :), doing things first and then
reading "pre-requirements" later.
Sincere thanks for your help that came through all the top-posted replies !!
:)
Cheers!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists
Hi,
I just bought a Seagate 1TB USB drive thinking that I could create a
few partitions in it, format in ext3 fs, then configure bacula to
setup a backup server in my CentOS box and backup my windows and mac
clients.
I have plugged the drive and mounted in /mnt/usbdrive and is seen as
/dev/sdb1 b
Thanks for your help Sean, did all the steps you mentioned. One thing
I don't understand, when partitions are created, why does Linux number
it awkwardly? For example, I created 1 Primary partition of 10% disk,
then created 1 Extended partition of 90% disk. Inside that extended
partition, I created
Hi,
I was using yum, which was working very well. Then I decided to try
yumex, and installed yumex, which again worked fine. But, after that,
when I came back to use console yum, it started giving error messages.
So, I removed yumex and tried, in vain. Then I removed yum, and
installed it with rpm
9 matches
Mail list logo
