Missing Dependency: device-mapper >= 1.02.32-1 is needed by
package lvm2-2.02.46-8.el5.i386 (base)
It would appear that these packages do exist, although earlier versions:
# rpm -q device-mapper
device-mapper-1.02.13-1.el5
Any thoughts would be appreaicated.
Regards,
Rohan.
--
Ruadhán Gillec
Hmm no. Time to read the notes. Thanks for your help!
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009, Robert wrote:
>
>
> Rohan Gilchrist wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I thought I'd wait a little while before upgrading to 5.4, but am
>> running into the following errors:
>>
>> -
Still the same problems I'm afraid. I read the release notes and
followed them to the letter.
I'm now seeing:
Finished Dependency Resolution
lvm2-2.02.46-8.el5.i386 from base has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: device-mapper >= 1.02.32-1 is needed by package
lvm2-2.02.46-8.el5.i386
: mirror.newnanutilities.org
* updates: mirror.ubiquityservers.com
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
Installed Packages
device-mapper.i386
Rohan
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Rohan Gilchrist wrote:
>
>> Still the same problems I'm afraid. I
Thanks for your help Bart. I had to download the device-mapper RPMs and
manually upgrade them first. Once I'd done that, the upgrade went fine.
Bart Schaefer wrote:
The mirrors that are being selected for you must not be fully up to
date. I don't know why that would be the case, but from a
n
I could only connect 3 times out of 10. This was from my
Mac laptop running Leopard. It would appear that something abnormal
is happening on this host.
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Tharun Kumar Allu wrote:
> Hi I have been facing a strange connectivity problem from CentOS and
> Fedora boxes.
>
> When I t
I'd love to attend, but tomorrow is my birthday and I've already made plans.
Regards,
Rohan.
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
> From Karan's blog:
>
> A few of us are going to be getting together for drinks on the Tuesday
> 29th Oct 2009, everyone is welcome to come along. I'll get there for
> abo
So you're saying that your default gateway is an IP address that's part of a
*different* network/subnet?
I don't know how this network has been designed, but typically I would expect
that your default gateway would be something like
188.72.255.1
rather than 217.20.117.1 that you've mentioned e
8 matches
Mail list logo