Re: [CentOS] Firewall frustration

2007-12-31 Thread Robert Spangler
On Mon December 31 2007 07:58, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Full discloser time. My day job is with ICSAlabs. My area is security > protocols research (like setttin up the initial IPsec certification > criteria), but when I visit the labs there are all those firewall > products up and running

Re: [CentOS] ICMP: 62.x.x.x: Source Route Failed

2008-01-19 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 09:14, ann kok wrote: > ICMP: 62.x.x.x: Source Route Failed Literally, it means that you send packet with "IP source and record route option" it was routed via router 62.x.x.x and was rejected by it. ICMP reason subcode 0x5, used with ICMP reason code 0x3 to expla

Re: [CentOS] name resolution question

2008-01-19 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 18 January 2008 17:57, Joe Greenseid wrote: > Can anyone explain the following behavior to me? What does your resolve.conf and hosts look like? -- Regards Robert Smile... it increases your face value! Linux User #296285 http://counter.li.org ___

[CentOS] Up2date

2008-01-20 Thread Robert Spangler
Hi all, I want to use UP2DATE to alert me to updates that are available but still use yum to make the update. Up2date alerts me and i see what is available and then update with yum. Up2date icon still shows updates are available. How can I get up2date to know that the system has been updated

Re: [CentOS] Why iptables are not working?

2008-01-23 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 06:25, Tolun ARDAHANLI wrote: > in our server we dont have "iptables" command! and i am trying to install > it with that > > yum -y install iptables > > after this command it says that "...nothings to do". Do you have any > suggestion for installing the iptables? >

Re: [CentOS] Why iptables are not working?

2008-01-23 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 17:58, John R Pierce wrote: > > > > It is most likely installed as this is default unless you tell the > > install program not to install it. > > > > To start IPTALBES: > > > > service iptables start > > > > To ensure it starts all the time on reboot: > > >

Re: [CentOS] Up2date

2008-01-25 Thread Robert Spangler
On Sunday 20 January 2008 13:11, Robert Spangler wrote: > I want to use UP2DATE to alert me to updates that are available but still > use yum to make the update. Up2date alerts me and i see what is available > and then update with yum. Up2date icon still shows updates are available.

Re: [CentOS] log outbound port 80 connections

2008-02-05 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 12:00, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j LOG --log-prefix "WWW " I was thinking more along these lines for a rule: iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -m state --state NEW -j LOG --log-prefix "[WWW] : " --log-tcp-options --log-ip-optio

[CentOS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-10 Thread Robert Spangler
Hi, I seem to not be able to connect to the folding site and receive new work. Anyone else having this issue? Port 8080 is open as well as the other web ports on the firewall. I can ping the host but get nothing when I open a web browser to it. Anyone else having the same issues? Where can

Re: [CentOS] help with x config on centos 5.1

2008-02-18 Thread Robert Spangler
On Monday 18 February 2008 08:20, Jerry Geis wrote: > Typically I dont have issues with configuring X. However this time its > an issue. > I have an NVIDIA graphics card trying to do 1920x1080. > > If I configure the screen by hand with the nvidia config utility it > works at 1920x1080. >

Re: [CentOS] SAMBA is driving me crazy

2008-02-24 Thread Robert Spangler
On Saturday 23 February 2008 17:07, scaglietti amore wrote: >  i have CentOS-5.1 with samba-3.0.25b-0.el5.4 >  and i took this workin well smb.conf from slackware12 What not just use SWAT to configure your samba settings? -- Regards Robert Smile... it increases your face value! Linux User #2

[CentOS] Gateway FHD2400

2008-03-11 Thread Robert Spangler
Hi, Anyone have this type of monitor hooked up and running? Any issues that I should be aware of? I've hooked this monitor up to my system. I have a Nvidia card FX550 with 256MB Ram. I haven't done anything special with it, still learning the in's and out's of the monitor. So far so good.

Re: [CentOS] Open extra ports on firewall?

2008-03-14 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 14 March 2008 12:32, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Right now, on one of my desktops, I've installed AMSN, which requires > opening a series of ports. I've configured the app to use ports 7000 to > 7010 (TCP and UDP). When running system-config-securitylevel-tui, the > last line enables to def

Re: [CentOS] Open extra ports on firewall?

2008-03-15 Thread Robert Spangler
On Saturday 15 March 2008 01:14, Niki Kovacs wrote: > > Check out this site. It's a tutorial fro IPTables. > > > > http://iptables.rlworkman.net/chunkyhtml/index.html > > Funny you send me this link. I know Robbie Workman as an ex-fellow > Slackware user. > > And I also know some basic ipta

[CentOS] Printer drivers

2008-03-20 Thread Robert Spangler
Hello, I see in the repo there are some printer drivers like foomatic and hpijs. I'm just wondering if there are plans to also include hplip in the future? -- Regards Robert Smile... it increases your face value! Linux User #296285 http://counter.li.org ___

Re: [CentOS] Printer drivers

2008-03-21 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 20 March 2008 21:24, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > I see in the repo there are some printer drivers like foomatic and > > hpijs. I'm just wondering if there are plans to also include hplip in > > the future? > > hplip is included in CentOS-5 but not in CentOS-4. Any plans to port to Cent

Re: [CentOS] Securing SSH

2008-03-25 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 12:55, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Tim Alberts wrote: > > So I setup ssh on a server so I could do some work from home and I > > think the second I opened it every sorry monkey from around the world > > has been trying every account name imaginable to get into the system. >

Re: [CentOS] Securing SSH

2008-03-26 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 07:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > The idea of only allowing for strict ip address is good but what if you > > are on the move? > > If you have a static IP address, this is not a problem. You VPN into your > home LAN and from there to the restricted machine. If you are g

Re: [CentOS] bind issue on centos 5

2007-07-06 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thu July 5 2007 06:29, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] master]# cat example77.com.zone > $TTL86400 > @ IN SOA gateway.example77.com. root.example77.com. ( > 2006101604 ; Serial > 1800 ; Refresh >

Re: [CentOS] new CentOS 5 install, 'Network is unreachable'

2007-08-04 Thread Robert Spangler
On Fri August 3 2007 23:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've a new CentOS 5 minimalist install; this will be the name server > from my prior thread. I have configured eth0 during setup with the > static IP the unit will have when in production. During this setup > phase, selinux is set to per

Re: [CentOS] repost: SELinux questions, upon restarting BIND

2007-08-17 Thread Robert Spangler
On Fri August 17 2007 09:16, Ray Leventhal wrote: > As this remains an issue for me, I'm reposting. Please forgive the > redundancy, but I've been unable to find the answer and am hoping for some > guidance. OK, are you running named in a chroot env? > > >

Re: [CentOS] "Site down for maintenance" - How is this accomplished?

2007-08-24 Thread Robert Spangler
On Fri August 24 2007 15:12, Brian Mathis wrote: > On 8/24/07, Chris Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 23, 2007, at 10:30 PM, Feizhou wrote: > > > Keep or setup a box inhouse to show the message, when the servers > > > are online in the data center, switch ips for the names over and >

Re: [CentOS] centos5 iptables expert needed

2007-08-28 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tue August 28 2007 12:27, Dave wrote: > Hello, > I'm setting up a centos5 router for a friend. It will direct traffic > to an internal webserver, already in place, as well as run squid proxy. It > should do nat and have a firewall with iptables. I've set up routers before > for this purpo

Re: [CentOS] What is eating my memory?

2007-08-30 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thu August 30 2007 00:08, William Warren wrote: > easier waylog in as root and type the word free to get a much > slimmer version of that information. If the numbers look odd(after > posting them here) then the more expansive option below is needed. You don't need to log in as root to

Re: [CentOS] DROP packet in the network card

2007-08-31 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thu August 30 2007 16:06, ann kok wrote: > there is number in RX-DRP but RX-ERR is 0 > > ls it normal? > > how is problem to make this RX-DRP Normally not unless you buffer is full. This happen when you receive packets faster then the kernel can process them. I've seen this on servers th

Re: [CentOS] named & rndc

2007-09-21 Thread Robert Spangler
On Fri September 21 2007 18:50, Craig White wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# kill 26598 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# service named restart > Stopping named:[FAILED] > Starting named:[ OK ] After you have ki

Re: [CentOS] is there an smp kernel?

2007-10-15 Thread Robert Spangler
On Mon October 15 2007 13:13, Jim Perrin wrote: > On 10/15/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well ... that "SMP" appears in uname -a even on a single-cpu system. > > Oops :-P > > I've only got multi-cpu systems these days and didn't test it out in a > vm. Glad to see you're keepin

Re: [CentOS] Best laptop for CentOS

2007-11-10 Thread Robert Spangler
On Sat November 10 2007 09:34, Paul wrote: > > Unfortunately, at least here in France there's no ing way to have a > > laptop without Microsoft Windows installed. I'm 100% GNU/Linux since > > 2001 or so, but I must have paid for five or six licenses since. > > I thought that I read that so

[CentOS] Firfox plugins but no sound

2007-11-12 Thread Robert Spangler
Hello everyone, I run a 64bit system here and install flash plugins for firefox using nspluginwrapper. I get the movies but there is no sound. Flashplayer is: flash-plugin-9.0.48.0-release.i386.rpm nspluginwrappers are: nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.5-1.x86_64.rpm nspluginwrapper-i386-0.9.91.5

Re: [CentOS] Firfox plugins but no sound

2007-11-12 Thread Robert Spangler
On Mon November 12 2007 12:28, Shibu C Varughese wrote: > Robert Spangler wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I run a 64bit system here and install flash plugins for firefox using > > nspluginwrapper. I get the movies but there is no sound. > > >

Re: [CentOS] Firfox plugins but no sound

2007-11-12 Thread Robert Spangler
On Mon November 12 2007 13:30, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > Robert Spangler wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I run a 64bit system here and install flash plugins for > > firefox using > > nspluginwrapper. I get the movies but there is no sound. >

Re: [CentOS] Firfox plugins but no sound

2007-11-14 Thread Robert Spangler
On Mon November 12 2007 15:54, James Pearson wrote: > On 12/11/2007, Robert Spangler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon November 12 2007 13:30, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > Robert Spangler wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > >

Re: [CentOS] OT: Scripting with sudo password

2007-11-14 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wed November 14 2007 14:41, James A. Peltier wrote: > Completely off topic, but I'm sure someone out there is using scripts > that require a sudo password of some sort, so I'll ask. > > What are people doing to automate tasks that required sudo passwords in > order to run? sudo without a p

Re: [CentOS] Firfox plugins but no sound

2007-11-15 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thu November 15 2007 06:04, James Pearson wrote: > If you have a 64 bit distro installed, then aplay will be 64 bit - > running: > > file `which aplay` Nope, but rpm -qa | grep alsa-util told me that I have the 64bit installed, which by the way does work fine. > should confirm this. To ru

Re: [CentOS] Firfox plugins but no sound

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Spangler
On Fri November 16 2007 06:06, James Pearson wrote: > > Might have to walk down this same path Thnx for all your help and time. > > The 32 bit kernel support for playback on 64 bit machines for older 2.6 > kernels (including the RHEL4/CentOS4 kernel) didn't work properly until > ALSA 1.0.15.

Re: [CentOS] How to setup both Transpaent Proxy and firewall on the same Machine.

2007-06-13 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tue June 12 2007 03:50, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > And, Then, I did below command. > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT > --to-port 3128 Which side is eth0 pointing to? LAN or Internet? If it's the Internet side then you need to change the above to th

Re: [CentOS] BQ/CentOs port forwarding

2007-06-14 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thu June 14 2007 18:06, Richard Veale wrote: > Just bought a new BQ/CentOS box with full NuOnce load (Linux > 2.6.9-55.ELsmp, gcc 3.4.6, Red Hat 3.4.6-8, Apache 2.0.52, BQ 5102r), to > replace my old Qube 3 pro, I have NAT setup (eth0 = inside, eth1 = outside) > but need to get port forwarding

Re: [CentOS] bind issue on centos 5

2007-07-04 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wed July 4 2007 08:47, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > i ma trying to setup bind-chroot on centos 5. > its named.comf file is confused to me. I can not get it up and running. > How can I fix it? I'm sure that nothing has changed from 4.5 to 5 so my thoughts are you are not placing the files in

Re: [CentOS] input/output error while copy

2011-01-14 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 14 January 2011 04:01, Ritika Garg wrote: > When I give the command "cp file1 file2" then the error comes: > cp: cannot create regular file `file2': Input/output error > > This occurs sometimes and it occurs when I am giving the command inside a > external hard disk which is mounted

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.6 is out

2011-01-14 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 14 January 2011 05:45, Mister IT Guru wrote: > On 13/01/2011 21:45, Daniel Heitmann wrote: > > On 13.01.2011, at 22:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > >> You should probably give RH a call with your questions, or try this > >> mailing list: > > > > Or wait a few more weeks for CentOS 6, i

Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?

2011-01-20 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 20 January 2011 09:14, Ross Walker wrote: > On Jan 19, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Bob Eastbrook wrote: > > By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes > > up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user, but how > > can I disable this system-wide? Ma

Re: [CentOS] redirecting traffic using iptables

2011-01-31 Thread Robert Spangler
On Monday 31 January 2011 07:46, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: >iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to > $PROXY:3128 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 443 -j > DNAT --to $PROXY:3128 > > browser tell me "invalid request". >From the man pages:

Re: [CentOS] iptables nat table rules

2011-02-08 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 13:36, Carlos S wrote: > I am forwarding traffic on port 8080 to port 80 with following rule. > # iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j > REDIRECT --to-port 80 Shouldn't that be '--to-ports'? http://www.zoominternet.net/~lazydog/iptables-tuto

Re: [CentOS] iptables nat table rules

2011-02-09 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 16:43, Carlos S wrote: > Thanks for the help. You are welcome. > Robert, you pointed out the mistakes correctly. Not sure why I used > iptables-save command at first place... Most likely because in ever other distro and web page that is the way to do it. It's ju

Re: [CentOS] /etc/hosts - hostname alias for 127.0.0.1

2011-03-07 Thread Robert Spangler
On Monday 07 March 2011 15:22, the following was written: > Keith Keller wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote: > >> Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this > >> sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the >

Re: [CentOS] /etc/hosts - hostname alias for 127.0.0.1

2011-03-09 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 08 March 2011 12:39, the following was written: > >> And giving it 127.0.0.1 would tell it others to ignore it, I think. > >> > >> Where did your user come up with this idea - clearly, they have *no* > >> clue what they're doing, and need at least a brown bag lunch about > >> TCP/

Re: [CentOS] /etc/hosts not resolving hostnames

2011-04-08 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 08 April 2011 14:32, the following was written: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:27 PM, wrote: > > Johan Martinez wrote: > > > I have modified /etc/hosts file with IP address and hostname entries. > > > However, host command is returning 'Host vhost1.example.com not found: > > > 3(NXDOMA

Re: [CentOS] Build a Firewall (Can I learn to do this...)

2009-10-01 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 01 October 2009 16:56, ML wrote: > I have a home business circuit and I am gearing up to host my business > affairs in my place. I have Comcast and 13 static IP's. > > I have an extra PIII 1U, 2 9gb SCSI, 1gb RAMm dual NICS. If you can, I would place a 3rd NIC into this device and

[CentOS] Rythmbox and MP3

2009-10-10 Thread Robert Spangler
Hello, Can anyone tell me how to get the 2 in the Subject line to work? I have read a lot about adding this or that repo but still no joy as usually deps are missing. :( Thnx -- Regards Robert Linux User #296285 http://counter.li.org ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Rythmbox and MP3

2009-10-11 Thread Robert Spangler
On Sunday 11 October 2009 01:22, Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote: > > Can anyone tell me how to get the 2 in the Subject line to work?  I have > > read a lot about adding this or that repo but still no joy as usually > > deps are missing. :( > > > > Usually rpm -Uhv > > http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el

Re: [CentOS] Rythmbox and MP3

2009-10-11 Thread Robert Spangler
On Sunday 11 October 2009 05:35, lostson wrote: > > > Can anyone tell me how to get the 2 in the Subject line to work? I > > > have read a lot about adding this or that repo but still no joy as > > > usually deps are missing. :( > > Personally I use rpmfusion repo which you can fine here > >

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

2009-10-19 Thread Robert Spangler
On Monday 19 October 2009 17:18, Bowie Bailey wrote: > The logs on my mail server are filling up with this kind of thing: > > Oct 19 17:03:51 bnofmail kernel: REJECT: IN=eth0 OUT= > MAC=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX SRC=195.140.240.6 > DST=XX.XX.XX.XX LEN=189 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL

Re: [CentOS] sudoers file

2009-10-28 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 04:11, vijay shanker wrote: > This file MUST be edited with the 'visudo' command as root. NO, it MUST not be edited with 'visudo'. YES, you should use 'visudo'. You can edit sudoer with vi or vim and save the changes too. Just read what it tells you you need to do

Re: [CentOS] combining iptables parameters

2009-10-29 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 16:36, Marcus Moeller wrote: > Dear Ryan. > > >> is there a way to combine iptables parameters like: iptables -A OUTPUT > >> -p UDP & -p TCP -d $IP1 & -d $IP2 ? > > > > Each of those parameters is called a "match", in IPTables-speak. You > > can specify multiple

Re: [CentOS] grub problems

2009-10-29 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 15:47, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > This is irritating: I've got a server I just upgraded to 5.4, then > rebooted, only to discover that it just *sits* there at the grub boot > menu. I looked at grub.conf, and uncommented hiddenmenu (which should have > been done long

Re: [CentOS] iptables -d fqdn instead of IP

2009-10-29 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 16:44, Marcus Moeller wrote: > does it work to define iptables rules with a fqdn as destination > instead of an IP address? Or is it useful to resolve the name first > using e.g. nslookup, writing the result to a variable which is then > used within the -d statemen

Re: [CentOS] iptables -d fqdn instead of IP

2009-10-30 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 29 October 2009 19:57, Ryan Lynch wrote: > No offense, Robert, but I don't think yours is a very helpful > statement. I think it is about time you get off my back! > When someone asks about alternative web servers, do we just > tell them "Best bet is to stay with Apache"? That'

Re: [CentOS] Syslog do not work

2009-10-30 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 30 October 2009 16:34, tim_da...@cbca.com wrote: > The syslog is not working Is it rumnning? check it with ps -ef | grep syslogd > and also I installed Webmin, also it does not > work, > this is what the error is " > > Info Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage " >

Re: [CentOS] How Can I change CentOS CLI Screen Resolution to smaller text (without GUI)?

2009-11-08 Thread Robert Spangler
On Sunday 08 November 2009 20:59, Sam Acosta wrote: > I'd like to view the Screen resolution in smaller text on my server > terminal. The server is not installed with any GUI so it's in plain text > mode. Try adding 'vga=795' to the end of the kernel line in grub.conf file. -- Regards Rob

Re: [CentOS] port forwarding using iptables

2009-11-25 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 25 November 2009 13:57, Boris Epstein wrote: > Happy Thanksgiving! Same to you too. > Does anybody know if there is a convenient utility to configure > iptables on a CentOS 5.4 or 5.3 machine to do port forwarding? And if > not, where and how does one put the requisite commands?

Re: [CentOS] Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall

2009-12-18 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 18 December 2009 16:05, Peter Serwe wrote: > I don't know jack about IPSet, but I know enabling or disabling hosts in > bare stock PF without the gui in front of it is about as easy as it gets. IPTALES is the same; iptables -A [INPUT/FORWARD] -d -j [REJECT/DROP] > The PF configura

[CentOS] Centos & UPS

2009-12-26 Thread Robert Spangler
Hello, I received for X-mas an APC UPS system form my computer. I'm looking for how I can integrate it into the system so that the system will shut down either after the UPS power is low enough or a timed event after the power is out will automatically shutdown. Would also like it to be smart

Re: [CentOS] Problems with IPTABLES recent module.

2010-01-08 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 08 January 2010 15:32, James B. Byrne wrote: > :BRUTE_FORCE - [0:0] > > . . . > -A BRUTE_FORCE -p tcp -m tcp -m state -m recent --set -i eth0 > --dport 22 --state NEW > -A BRUTE_FORCE -m comment -j RETURN --comment "Return to calling chain" > COMMIT Check out this TUTORIAL http:

Re: [CentOS] routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

2010-01-20 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 13:57, Frank Cox wrote: > On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 09:50 -0800, R-Elists wrote: > > ummm, why do the two different networks need an IP on the same > > subnet ? > > I have had a number of people ask me why I want this arrangement, where > I have two modems on a single

Re: [CentOS] DNS issue.. help ?!

2010-01-26 Thread Robert Spangler
On Monday 25 January 2010 09:35, Roland Roland wrote: > it's all working fine, right now i want to change the main public dns > from one IP to another to do some testing (the new public dns ip has > records which the old one doesnt have and it's done as such for testing) > > so i got into /etc

Re: [CentOS] pls help about changing network card but assign to another ethx

2010-02-04 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 04 February 2010 14:21, adrian kok wrote: > Hi > > I change eth1 from realtek to dlink but the centos is showing eth2 instead > of eth1 Edit your ifcfg-eth1 and add the MAC Address of the card. I would do this for every interface. -- Regards Robert Linux User #296285 http://cou

Re: [CentOS] ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.

2008-04-18 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 18 April 2008 12:23, Masry Alex wrote: > #that's what the mentioned article suggested..I'm not sure it's working! > *raw > -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j NOTRACK Do you have a chain called NOTRACK? What is setup under it? > COMMIT > *filter > -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT

Re: [CentOS] network Interface

2008-04-22 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 01:49, gopinath wrote: > if i run ifconfig it displays the eth0 its ip and Hwaddress > > if i boot to Centos 5.1 or Redhat 7.3 the pc is able to communicated to > everyone on the networks. > > Please help me out. How about check the configs against one another on all 3

[CentOS] Problems with KMail and signatures

2008-04-24 Thread Robert Spangler
Hello, For some reason KMail is all but coming to a stand still when I open messages with any kind of signature. So I goto the configuration page of KMail Security Crypo Back ends and I see nothing is checked off. So I hit rescan and get the error that is listed in the attachment. Anyone els

Re: [CentOS] Problems with KMail and signatures

2008-04-24 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 24 April 2008 14:07, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Thursday 24 April 2008 18:58:24 Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Thursday 24 April 2008 18:45:40 Robert Spangler wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > For some reason KMail is all but coming to a stand still

Re: [CentOS] NFS mount problems

2008-04-26 Thread Robert Spangler
On Saturday 26 April 2008 09:05, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > > > Bringing up interface borg2: RTNETLINK answers: File exists > > > > > Error adding address 192.168.0.40 for eth0. > > > > > > > > > > but ifconfig shows the correct address for eth0. > > > > > > > > > Apr 26 11:11:52 borg2 automo

Re: [CentOS] NFS mount problems

2008-04-26 Thread Robert Spangler
On Saturday 26 April 2008 10:19, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Saturday 26 April 2008 14:29, Robert Spangler wrote: > > >  > > This is a firewall issue.  If I turn off the firewall everything > > >  > > works. NFS and SMB are marked as trusted services, but it se

Re: [CentOS] NFS mount problems

2008-04-28 Thread Robert Spangler
On Monday 28 April 2008 10:47, Philip R. Schaffner wrote: > For relatively simple situations Firestarter may be worth a look as a > GUI front end: > > http://www.fs-security.com/ > > There is an EL4 binary version on the above site, but it builds OK from > SRPM on CentOS-5: > > > http://supe

[CentOS] Centos Freezing

2008-05-13 Thread Robert Spangler
Hello, For some reason at different times Centos will freeze and not allow me to do anything. This doesn't happen while I'm working on the system but after I have locked my session and then return. It could goes days without a lockup and then the next time I try to log in it'll be frozen. I

Re: [CentOS] Centos Freezing

2008-05-16 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 15 May 2008 21:51, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Robert Spangler wrote: > > For some reason at different times Centos will freeze and not allow me > > to do anything. This doesn't happen while I'm working on the system but > > af

Re: [CentOS] Centos Freezing

2008-05-17 Thread Robert Spangler
On Saturday 17 May 2008 08:12, B.J. McClure wrote: > I had a similar situation on CentOS 4.x and on 5.0, different boxes. In > both cases it was resolved by replacing a bad stick of RAM. If the box > can be off line I would suggest a 24 hour run of memtest. On my systems > it only occurred

Re: [CentOS] IPTables help

2008-05-23 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 23 May 2008 21:31, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > Actually I have written a small tutorial on iptables, but I haven't > translated it into english. I'll let you know when it's done. Hopefully it > will be useful for others. Please have someone, or for that matter a few people, who have a good

Re: [CentOS] IPTables help

2008-05-24 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 23 May 2008 11:03, Fajar Priyanto wrote: >  On Thursday 22 May 2008 22:30:29 Joseph L. Casale wrote: >  > I have a dual homed server in an install for someone who is very cost >  > sensitive. This server originally is being setup as an Asterisk server, >  > but now the simplest thing for

[CentOS] FireFox

2008-05-27 Thread Robert Spangler
Can anyone tell me if there are plans to update Firefox to the new 3.0 for Centos 4.5? Seems like only the 1.5 version has been placed in the repos and I think it should be time for an upgrade. If I'm looking in the wrong place let me know also. Thnx. -- Regards Robert Smile... it increas

Re: [CentOS] FireFox

2008-05-27 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 19:31, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Robert Spangler > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can anyone tell me if there are plans to update Firefox to the new 3.0 > > for Centos 4.5? Seems like only the 1.5 ver

Re: [CentOS] FireFox

2008-05-29 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 20:19, MHR wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Spangler > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can I use one out of the Fedora's repos? If so, which repo? > > You can just pull down the latest version from mozilla.or

Re: [CentOS] iptables starting while disabled

2008-06-14 Thread Robert Spangler
On Saturday 14 June 2008 09:49, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >chkconfig iptables off > > That was how I disabled it originally yet it was being started by > something else. jlc Did you install another firewall front end? Something like Firestarter? -- Regards Robert Smile... it increases you

Re: [CentOS] Understanding iptables

2008-07-10 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 10 July 2008 18:08, MHR wrote: > In following up on the rsh "problem" I was having earlier, I decided > to try out the suggestion Felipe sent about using > system-config-securitylevel-tui to open up ports 513 and 514, but that > doesn't seem to do the job, either. > > # iptables -

Re: [CentOS] Understanding iptables

2008-07-11 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 10 July 2008 22:49, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > > Could you post /etc/sysconfig/iptables? > > /etc/sysconfig/iptables doesn't necessarily reflect what is running > right now, and you can't include the counters with it. I'm not interested in the counters I want to see how the rul

Re: [CentOS] Help with iptables rule for blocking UDP port 53

2008-07-15 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 14:43, nate wrote: > Try to insert the rule (-I) instead of append (-A). I recall encountering > weirdness between using the two different methods for adding a rule. > I don't know why, but it seems to make a difference in some cases. > The man page doesn't make it clea

Re: [CentOS] Help with iptables rule for blocking UDP port 53

2008-07-15 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 16:57, nate wrote: > > (-A) Appends the new rule at the end of the chain. > > > > (-I) will insert it at the beginning when no line number is given. > > > > Man iptables for this information > > I read the man page and it didn't make sense I guess because my > rules

Re: [CentOS] Firewall in CentOS 5.1

2008-07-24 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 24 July 2008 03:34, Gopinath Achari wrote: >Please suggest me a good firewall package for Cent OS 5.1 Server. This > server is going to face to internet and will be accessed by the branch > offices. IPTABLES is the best firewall you are going to get on Linux. Sure you can use a

Re: [CentOS] BIND and a second server resolving itself

2011-10-07 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 07 October 2011 06:25, the following was written: > In the named.conf, located on main.example.com, I am adding my entire 16 > IP block of addresses along with my localhost > options { > allow-recursion { localhost; xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx /29;}; > allow-query { localhost; xxx.xxx

Re: [CentOS] Emergency help needed on host network randomly stop working.

2011-10-12 Thread Robert Spangler
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 03:43, the following was written: > Hi, >This is a Centos 5.5 host with one xen guest. >About 2 weeks ago, the host randomly lost network connection. By > this I mean I could not connect to the services on it, or ping it. > Also was the status of the guest.

Re: [CentOS] configure network bridge listing bridged intefaces

2012-02-03 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 03 February 2012 08:07, the following was written: > Hi all, > > Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge > named br0. > > Searching the web I only found about creating a file > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to > explic

Re: [CentOS] configure network bridge listing bridged intefaces

2012-02-03 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written: > On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge > > named br0. > > > > Searching the web I only found about creating a file > > /et

Re: [CentOS] configure network bridge listing bridged intefaces

2012-02-05 Thread Robert Spangler
On Saturday 04 February 2012 19:18, the following was written: > On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote: > > On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written: > >> On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > >> > Hi all, >

Re: [CentOS] iptables nat PREROUTING chain

2012-02-14 Thread Robert Spangler
On Tuesday 14 February 2012 15:21, the following was written: > Is there a way to add a rule to the nat table (CentOS 5.7) that would > alter the port number of tcp packets destined for the server itself? I > have ip_forwarding enabled, but the packets don't seem to hit the > prerouting chain

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.2 software raid 10 with LVM - Need help with degraded drive and only one MBR

2012-03-02 Thread Robert Spangler
On Saturday 03 March 2012 00:35, the following was written: > I escalated to the DC manager and this is what he replied: > > "I'm sorry your having a hard time with software raid on your server and > our install process. From what I remember talking with out techs long > ago about this is, tha

[CentOS] Running processes

2012-03-08 Thread Robert Spangler
Hello, I was wondering if anyone could tell me why so many processes are started on my system? Here is a list of them. I am trying to figure out why they are running and if I can stop them. Thnx. USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S<

Re: [CentOS] Running processes

2012-03-08 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 08 March 2012 20:44, the following was written: > From the looks of things, you have 8 CPUs (or cores), and these standard > > processes are being started on a 1 per core basis. > > I have a quad-core proc, and have 4 of each of those processes (0-3). That is what I was thinking bu

[CentOS] File permissions

2012-03-10 Thread Robert Spangler
Hello, I need to know if there is something I am missing about file permission as I believe I am seeing some strange stuff on my system. I have a directory as follows: drwxrwxrwx 7 root root 4096 Mar 10 13:35 temp In this directory I have a file: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 137 Oct 30 0

Re: [CentOS] File permissions

2012-03-11 Thread Robert Spangler
On Saturday 10 March 2012 13:45, the following was written: Thnx everyone. I was under the impression that even though you had access to the directory you still could not touch a file that you were not part of the owner or group unless the bits were set. -- Regards Robert Linux The adventu

Re: [CentOS] router NAT problem

2009-06-11 Thread Robert Spangler
On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:14, Mintairov Mikhail wrote: > iptables -F > iptables -F -t nat > iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -s 192.168.127.0/24 -j SNAT > --to-source [my internet ip] I know how some like to do the SNAT thing, but a simple rule will get t

[CentOS] More then one version of KDE

2009-06-19 Thread Robert Spangler
Hello, Is it possible to have more then one version of KDE installed and switch between them? I'd like to try out the new KDE but don't want to lose what I have now. Thnx -- Regards Robert Linux User #296285 http://counter.li.org ___ CentOS mail

  1   2   >