Re: [CentOS] Centos podcast on FLOSS weekly

Frank Cox wrote: On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:05:14 -0400 Jorge Fábregas wrote: On Thursday 18 November 2010 12:18:16 Les Mikesell wrote: check out this week's (142) video podcast at http://twit.tv/floss Hey thanks for the tip. I just finished watching it (very interesting interview

Re: [CentOS] nspluginwrapper rpms on x86_64? (was: firefox. java. 64 bit. bleah!)

On Nov 21, 2010, at 8:10 AM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > Mike Fedyk writes: >> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Lars Hecking >> wrote: >>> ??Possibly. Or possibly not. On a closely related topic, can you comment on >>> ??whether or not it's a good idea to install the nspluginwrapper

Re: [CentOS] Postfix - message queue filling with Host or name not found - try again

Ben McGinnes wrote: On 17/11/10 7:26 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Examining the postfix queue with postqueue -p: I see many (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com type=MX: Host not found, try again) j

Re: [CentOS] CentOS vs. RHEL vs. Oracle Linux ?

Scott Robbins wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 04:30:32PM +, Hakan Koseoglu wrote: On 24 November 2010 15:13, Scott Robbins wrote: OEL is a funny one. The only reason it exists is to destroy the upstream. They're completely unlike CentOS in mentality. Their main

Re: [CentOS] Postfix - message queue filling with Host or name not found - try again

Mike Fedyk wrote: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Hi list, I have noted over the last week or so my DNS servers are dumping lots of messages for bogus domain lookups. Examining the postfix queue with postqueue -p: I see many (Host or domain name not found. Name service

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!

Daniel J Walsh wrote: I wrote this paper to try to explain what SELinux tends to complain about. http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/Presentations/selinux_four_things.pdf I am having difficulty with the pdf file - both adobe and kpdf have problems with the pages with screen shots

Re: [CentOS] 5.5 x86_64 live cd

cybernet wrote: A preliminary development version of ext4 was included in version 2.6.19^[4] of the Linux kernel . On 11 October 2008, the patches that mark ext4 as stable code were merged in the Linux

Re: [CentOS] server version on laptop

Johan Scheepers wrote: Good day, What can I expect if I should install a server version of a distro on my laptop, please. Thanks Johan Hi Johan, Pretty much the same as installing it on any other system. I run CentOS on multiple servers at home and my small business (5 last count) as we

[CentOS] CentOS-testing php issues

Hi List, I have been using the php 5.2.10 from the testing repo and note the following: the php-suhosin packages in testing do not match the php version PHP Warning: PHP Startup: suhosin: Unable to initialize module Module compiled with module API=20050922, debug=0, thread-safety=0 PHPcom

Re: [CentOS] installing windows 2008 server( VM) on a centosxenserver

Gabriel wrote: Google xlaunch for windows – run that baby, with the same ssh command, and it’ll work the same. A good ssh client for windows is Bitvise Tunnilier (I may have spelt it wrong, but google will help you out with that!) +1 - have used this for 6 years from windoze clients *Fro

Re: [CentOS] Converting to maildir

Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 09:56 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: On 1/4/2011 8:14 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Many people care about storage format. And they are misguided in doing so. Details of message storage is an internal [server's] problem. S

Re: [CentOS] Converting to maildir

Jason Pyeron wrote: -Original Message- From: Les Mikesell Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 12:28 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Converting to maildir On 1/4/2011 10:00 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Many people care about storage format. And they are misguided in doing so. Deta

Re: [CentOS] Compiling thunderbird

lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: As far as I can tell, all objects are being compiled with -fPIC. And -m64. Including gfxUserFontSet.cpp. It's a bug, and I was able to compile it by applying the fix from here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615196 So ar

[CentOS] latest kernel - version question

Hi List, just doing my weekly yum update and noticed that the kernel is designated .i686 but the headers package is .i386?? surely the headers should match the kernel geometry that it was compiled for? confused. TIA Rob <>___ CentOS mailing list CentO

Re: [CentOS] latest kernel - version question

On Jan 9, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 09:31:19 -0500 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> >> >> Hi List, >> just doing my weekly yum update and noticed that the kernel is >> designated .i686 but the headers package is .i386?? >> surely the headers should mat

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

Stewart Williams wrote: John R Pierce wrote: Stewart Williams wrote: John R Pierce wrote: Stewart Williams wrote: The block I/O is the thing that concerns me as mostly I am serving a 650MB file via samba to 5 clients and I think this is where I need the spee

Re: [CentOS] Poor RAID performance new Xeon server?

Hi Stuart Stewart Williams wrote: Hi Rob, Rob Kampen wrote: Hi, I too run quickbooks (2007) and offer the following scenario - 5 user licences (actually 2 times three user package were purchased). Previously I used version 2004 and this allows much better sharing of the data file

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9650SE tuning advice

Ray Van Dolson wrote: Hello fellow sysadmins! I've assembled a whitebox system with a SuperMicro motherboard, case, 8GB of memory and a single quad core Xeon processor. I have two 9650SE-8LPML cards (8 ports each) in each server with 12 1TB SATA drives total. Three drives per "lane" on each

Re: [CentOS] Does CentOS 5 support USB 1 ?

MHR wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Russell Bell wrote: We upgraded our Internet server to CentOS 5 from RedHat 4. : The hosts (across the country) tell us CentOS doesn't support USB 1 ! I find this unbelievable. Can anyone set me straight?

[CentOS] Web pages time out after server rebuild

Hi All, I have an old (2004) Intel based server with 4G of ram running Linux ndgonline.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux fully up to date using centOS rpms for apache, php, and mysql. I have just changed from dmraid to md raid for the OS on mirro

Re: [CentOS] Web pages time out after server rebuild

Scott Silva wrote: on 1-21-2009 7:14 AM Rob Kampen spake the following: Hi All, I have an old (2004) Intel based server with 4G of ram running Linux ndgonline.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux fully up to date using centOS rpms

Re: [CentOS] Web pages time out after server rebuild

nate wrote: Rob Kampen wrote: How do I get some extra log info to track this down? Have you tried to run 'show full processlist' on mysql while the query is running? It should show all active queries, what they are doing and how long they have been running

Re: [CentOS] Web pages time out after server rebuild

Rob Kampen wrote: nate wrote: Rob Kampen wrote: How do I get some extra log info to track this down? Have you tried to run 'show full processlist' on mysql while the query is running? It should show all active queries, what they are doing and how long they have been r

[CentOS] SELinux - null security context

I'm seeing this every hour when the hourly cron job runs NULL security context for user, but SELinux in permissive mode, continuing () I've tried fixfiles but obviously I'm missing something Any SELinux gurus that can point me in the right direction? Thanks Rob begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - null security context

Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hi, 2009/1/28 Rob Kampen : I'm seeing this every hour when the hourly cron job runs NULL security context for user, but SELinux in permissive mode, continuing Try to use "ps -Z" to see if all your processes have appropriate security

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - null security context

Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:00 -0500, Rob Kampen wrote: Last resort was the 'touch /.autorelabel' and reboot. This took nearly an hour but once it came up all was well. Thanks for the pointers Filipe. At what point would it be safe to go to enforcing? What logs s

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY

Jason Pyeron wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Brett Serkez Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:55 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY [OT]

Jason Pyeron wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Craig White Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 15:52 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 13:4

Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY

Sorry for the delayed response, needed to dreg the memory banks John wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rob Kampen Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:30 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks

Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?

dnk wrote: Hi there, I am currently setting up a server that will house my backups (simply using rsync). This system has 4 X 500 gb drives and I am looking to raid for max drive space and data safety. Performance is not so much a concern. My experience with software raids in nil, so so

Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?

08 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: Linux software raid works fine and I use this recipe http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Partitioning_RAID_/_LVM_on_RAID If you can afford a proper hardware raid controller for raid 6, that would be of better performance than linux software raid, other than that I have

Re: [CentOS] centos.plus kernels

Alain Terriault wrote: hi, I experienced 3 problems that i am 99% sure related to kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus.x86_64.rpm #1 on a nfs server problem : constantly appearing o

[CentOS] Thunderbird and Firefox

I have two CentOS plus x86_64 workstations that as far as possible I am trying to keep the same. One for home, one for my office. I have the 32 bit Firefox installed along with a number of plugins and have just found that firefox no longer plays any shockwave content on my work machine, I have

[CentOS] Firefox plugins gone (but only for one user)

Hi gurus I have a CentOS 5.2 current x86_64 that has Thunderbird and Firefox working well for one user account (my wife) but will not play nice for my account. I have uninstalled thunderbird and firefox (via yum) and re-installed - no change. I have just wiped the .mozilla folder and started af

Re: [CentOS] Firefox plugins gone (but only for one user)

Noob Centos Admin wrote: 2009/2/26 Rob Kampen : Hi gurus I have a CentOS 5.2 current x86_64 that has Thunderbird and Firefox working well for one user account (my wife) but will not play nice for my account. Have you tried creating a new profile (not new Linux account) in Firefox and

Re: [CentOS] Firefox plugins gone (but only for one user)

William L. Maltby wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 23:17 -0500, Rob Kampen wrote: Hi gurus I have a CentOS 5.2 current x86_64 that has Thunderbird and Firefox working well for one user account (my wife) but will not play nice for my account. I have uninstalled thunderbird and firefox (via yum

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

Robert Heller wrote: At Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:59:02 -0600 CentOS mailing list wrote: R P Herrold wrote: Here is the fallout: The poor end user 'knows' it was CentOS, because she was told by the respinner that it is 'CentOS with just one package replaced'. Who gets the black eye here?

Re: [CentOS] Disk usage for small files in ext3 in CentOS 5

Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hello, I noticed something unusual today. If I "du" a small file (couple of bytes) in CentOS 5, it tells me the file is using 8kb, while I was expecting 4kb which is the block size I'm using. I tried this on several CentOS 5 machine

Re: [CentOS] Wine

madunix wrote: Am running Centos5.2 64Bit, want to run windows application on it [...@linux10 ~]$ uname -a Linux 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 #1 SMP Wed Sep 24 19:32:05 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [...@linux10 ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.2 (Final) Which Wine version should i

[CentOS] Firefox seg faults

Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully current CentOS x86_64. Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386 [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i386 One machine (home)

Re: [CentOS] Firefox seg faults

Rob Kampen wrote: Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully current CentOS x86_64. Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386 [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire firefox-3.0.6-1.el5

Re: [CentOS] Firefox seg faults

William L. Maltby wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:30 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: Update: removed firefox and flash via yumex. removed the ~/.mozilla folder completely and started afresh. re-installed firefox - i386 version on a x86_64 system as this seem to be the safest and it

Re: [CentOS] Firefox seg faults

A. Kirillov wrote: Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully current CentOS x86_64. Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386 [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i3

Re: [CentOS] Firefox seg faults

A. Kirillov wrote: Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully current CentOS x86_64. Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386 [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i3

Re: [CentOS] Dell 120 GB 5400 RPM Encrypted Serial ATA Hard Drive

nate wrote: Agile Aspect wrote: Hi - I've been asked to re-partition a Dell 120 GB 5400 RPM Encrypted Serial ATA Hard Drive and install CentOS 5 on the new partition. It's a Dell Lattitude E5400 laptop. Is this even possible with encrypted drives? How is it encrypted? Some ne

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Rob Kampen Neal Development Group On Mar 27, 2009, at 18:39, Frank Thommen wrote: > nate wrote: >> Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> [...] >> >> I think it's safe to assume that the majority of CentOS users out >> there run CentOS on servers, not o

[CentOS] Samba and iptables - woes

Hi folk, I am trying to get iptables working on a samba server but find it is blocking something that prevents the windoze clients from being able to access the share. here are the bits from iptables: # nmb provided netbios-ns -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp -m udp -s 192.168.230.100/24 -i eth1

Re: [CentOS] Samba and iptables - woes

ass C. tried changing it to 192.168.230.0/24 as suggested by another, no difference still does not work; as I suspected the last octet can be any value it is effectively masked by the /24. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rob K

Re: [CentOS] Samba and iptables - woes

Craig White wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 00:19 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: Hi folk, I am trying to get iptables working on a samba server but find it is blocking something that prevents the windoze clients from being able to access the share. here are the bits from iptables: # nmb

Re: [CentOS] Samba and iptables - woes

Spook ZA wrote: Hi. 2009/3/31 Rob Kampen : Hi folk, I am trying to get iptables working on a samba server but find it is blocking something that prevents the windoze clients from being able to access the share. here are the bits from iptables: # nmb provided netbios-ns -A RH

Re: [CentOS] Samba and iptables - woes

on the other one due to routing rules, thus the client gets confused. Reading the man ip leaves me confused, I understand the basics but this is WAY over my competence level. What kind of rule do I need here, need some expert assistance please. Thanks Rob On 3/31/09, Rob Kampen wrote

Re: [CentOS] Samba and iptables - woes

Scott Silva wrote: on 3-30-2009 9:19 PM Rob Kampen spake the following: Hi folk, I am trying to get iptables working on a samba server but find it is blocking something that prevents the windoze clients from being able to access the share. here are the bits from iptables: # nmb

Re: [CentOS] contradictory netfilter default policy

Michael Klinosky wrote: I'm curious why CentOS contradicts its own (or, actually RH's) netfilter default policy. On http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/IPTables , at the end of section 1, it's stated that (generally) the default policy for INPUT is to DROP. So, why is it set to ACCEPT? Btw,

Re: [CentOS] Update from 5.2 to 5.3 kernel not on mirror

Blake Hudson wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] Update from 5.2 to 5.3 kernel not on mirror From: Michael Peterson To: CentOS mailing list Date: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:02:36 PM John R Pierce wrote: Michael Peterson wrote: I have tried today and at

Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA

Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:31 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: Craig White schrieb: Sure but that's not typically the realm I play in. My typical client is < 50 users and having a server just for authentication is harder to justfiy. In that case, shelling ou

[CentOS] Clamav question after upgrade to 5.3 and 0.95

Hi list, I have installed ClamAV from rpmforge and followed the excellent CentOS how to on installing amavisd - all has appeared to just work as advertised - thanks to all those involved in getting these instructions together. Come time to upgrade to 5.3 and ClamAV 0.95 (logwatch has been enco

Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault using flash-plugin under CentOS 5.3

carlopmart wrote: Hi all I have a very strange problem on my CentOS 5.3 laptop. I have installed latest firefox version from updates repository (3.0.7) with flash-plugin downloaded from adobe website. When i open firefox and i need to access to some web site with flash content, firefox cras

Re: [CentOS] Raid1 on CentOS 5.x 64bit

Paul Heinlein wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Matt wrote: Does anyone know of a howto on setting up raid1 on CentOS 5.x 64 bit? At install-time or after the machine is already running? I was trying at install time. Although, how difficult is it to make a .386 CentOS 4.

Re: [CentOS] Local root vulnerability in udev

Lanny Marcus wrote: On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: I just saw this thread in the OLM forum. Possibly of interest, since they say it includes CentOS 5, if the update hasn't been released yet. Always good to keep boxes updated, for security and stability reasons.

Re: [CentOS] Local root vulnerability in udev

John Austin wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:21 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: I just saw this thread in the OLM forum. Possibly of interest, since they say it includes CentOS 5, if the update hasn't

Re: [CentOS] Local root vulnerability in udev

Andrew Colin Kissa wrote: On 20 Apr 2009, at 3:39 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: John Austin wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:21 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote: I just saw this thread

Re: [CentOS] Local root vulnerability in udev

Lanny Marcus wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: I just killed the udevd on my two servers and await the update What are you looking for? Rob: Rick said the update for udev is now available. I haven't received the email with the announcment that

Re: [CentOS] QuickBooks Enterprise DB Server

On Apr 21, 2009, at 16:17, "Joseph L. Casale" wrote: > Anyone running this POS on CentOS and can spare some info? Support > is useless, and it's just not working:)I am not getting a qbdir.dat > file created, and the error log is, well, empty! > > jlc >

Re: [CentOS] Yum update corrupted something badly - can only get access through SSH terminal or Webmin

Dan Roberts wrote: thanks for the details - As the server lives in a closet without a monitor on it or even easy access I opted for Webmin so as to have the ability to get in and work with it. I will resubscribe and get back into a better habit - I had been checking every day a year ago,

Re: [CentOS] flash-plugin-9.0.124.0-1 having problems since firefox-3.0.7-3.el4.centos

Bart Schaefer wrote: Updated yesterday to the latest firefox from CentOS, and now RPMforge flash-plugin will only play a few seconds of video (such as CNN, iReport, etc.) at a time before becoming stuck; dragging the slider back a little allows it to play a bit further, but then it stops again.

Re: [CentOS] flash-plugin-9.0.124.0-1 having problems since firefox-3.0.7-3.el4.centos

Ralph Angenendt wrote: Rob Kampen wrote: Bart Schaefer wrote: glibc issues on el4 prevent upgrading to the newer flash-plugin or any of the newer modules from the Adobe repo. Hi Bart, why the old flash version? If people would read before they write ... Ralph

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote: > > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? > > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would >

Re: [CentOS] ClearOS rebuild

Ian Murray wrote: This week's FLOSS Weekly interview is about ClearOS (audio/video at http://twit.tv/floss168). Apparently they have taken the CentOS developer's frequently given advice to go away and do it yourself and will have a 'ClearOS core' release that is their own rebuild from

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hi guys, Sorry for the OT. For the last couple of weeks I notice that the static in my server room is worrisomely noticeable. I cannot see what may be causing it Care to share some of your experience what may be the cause and the remedy? Check the humidity - if it ge

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

Fajar Priyanto wrote: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Dan Carl wrote: If you spend a lot of time in your server room, you might also consider a fish tank. It will add moisture to your room and give you something to look at other than flashing leds:-) Is this a joke or a real thing? I

Re: [CentOS] Starting asterisk: /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk: line 86: ulimit: open files: cannot modify limit: Operation not permitted

Kaushal Shriyan wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Kaushal Shriyan wrote: Hi Please help me understand about the below issue ? [root@asterisk1 ~]# /etc/init.d/asterisk restart Stopping safe_asterisk:

Re: [CentOS] mounting a CentOS 5.5-based NFS partitions from a Mac OS X machine

Boris Epstein wrote: Is the OS X firewall blocking nfs? How are you mounting the export? If you're not trying it from within Terminal, does it work from within it? __ The OS X firewall dos not appear to be a factor. Actually it works just fine w

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 CDs isos...

Karanbir Singh wrote: On 07/12/2011 11:18 AM, John Doe wrote: Yeah, I just got the announcement, sorry... Dunno if it is Yahoo Mail but I keep receiving the mails from the mailing list in random timeline... By example, today I just received some mails from Saturday and Sunday... Yahoo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6

On 07/19/2011 10:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I finally switched workstations, and am running into a lot of truly annoying details with CentOS 6, and the software with it. For one, I'm doing this by webmail, and this version of Firefox *insists* on putting what I'm typing in gray, rather than

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6

On 07/19/2011 10:58 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 07/19/2011 10:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I finally switched workstations, and am running into a lot of truly annoying details with CentOS 6, and the software with it. For one, I'm doing this by webmail, and this version of Firefox *insists* on p

[CentOS] nfsv4 and kerberos - fails to mount

I have been trying all sorts of things to get this working. nfsv4 works fine if I just use the nfs-v3 form of export i.e. /nfs4exports 192.168.230.237/24(ro,fsid=0,sync,insecure,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check,squash_uids=0-99) /nfs4exports/NDG 192.168.230.237/24(rw,insecure,no_subtree_check,no

Re: [CentOS] nfsv4 and kerberos - fails to mount

On 07/19/2011 04:43 PM, Olaf Mueller wrote: Rob Kampen wrote: Hello, nfs4 with kerberos works fine here on CentOS 5.6. change exports to [...]gss/krb([...] [...]gss/krb([...] My /etc/exports says '... gss/krb5(...'. Got this already And 'SECURE_NFS="yes"'

Re: [CentOS] nfsv4 and kerberos - fails to mount

Rob Kampen wrote: On 07/19/2011 04:43 PM, Olaf Mueller wrote: Rob Kampen wrote: Hello, nfs4 with kerberos works fine here on CentOS 5.6. change exports to [...]gss/krb([...] [...]gss/krb([...] My /etc/exports says '... gss/krb5(...'. Got this already And 'SECURE_NFS=&

[CentOS] www.mydomain.org and mydomain.org should resolve to the same IP

Hi list, I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy. thus www.mydomain.org goes to one of godaddy's servers but the mydomain.org and mail.mydomain.org and ns1.mydomain.org all go elsewhere. My website desi

Re: [CentOS] www.mydomain.org and mydomain.org should resolve to the same IP

Stephen Harris wrote: On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:45:15PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: At Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:55:33 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: I am having a debate with one of my clients where I administer their domain and storage server but the website is hosted by godaddy.

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

Anne Wilson wrote: On 23 August 2011 10:46, Tony Mountifield wrote: In article , Anne Wilson wrote: On 22 August 2011 20:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum install postfix followed by a yum remove sendmail

Re: [CentOS] 6.0 Media problems

Karanbir Singh wrote: hi Ken, On 08/30/2011 03:04 PM, ken wrote: would be one place. But, given the way search engines might index pages, people could bypass that page and land directly on the mirrors page,

Re: [CentOS] 6.0 Media problems

ken wrote: On 08/30/2011 10:10 AM Karanbir Singh wrote: hi Ken, On 08/30/2011 03:04 PM, ken wrote: would be one place. But, given the way search engines might index pages, people could bypass that page and land directly on t

Re: [CentOS] Continuous releases and repository protection

James A. Peltier wrote: Maybe I missed something, but it appears that the CR repository is not compatible with yum priorities & possibly repository protection. I had priority=1 set on [base] and [updates] and no updates appeared. However, when I removed priority updates from cr became visibl

Re: [CentOS] XORG and LCD Projector

Andrew 'Dewa' B. Osmond wrote: dear guys, I have a problem between my CentOS 5.5 (on Axioo notebook) and LCD Projector. When I connect my notebook to LCD Projector, it can detect my notebook. But when I press Fn + F7 to activate dual monitor between my notebook and LCD Projector it goes to bl

[CentOS] javaWS under firefox on CentOS 5.6 fails to launch sound

Hi List, Before I spend hours chasing this - my initial google search seems to indicate that javaWS and JNLP apps with sound do not work on CentOS systems. The developer's website says they support :- *Linux* *Supported OS’s and recommended versions of Java* * Linux o openSUSE 11

Re: [CentOS] PDF Reader/Editor for CentOS 5.7 (32 bit)?

Lanny Marcus wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: I had, in the past, a .pdf reader that also permitted me to fill in some information, when I received a .pdf file. Received a contract via email and I would like to add some information and send it back vi

Re: [CentOS] Files being modified in /bin/

Jeremy Sanders wrote: Micky L Martin wrote: Because rpm and rpmverify also seemed to have been modified so I cannot trust 'rpm -V' package verification. Already did lsof and process tracing but to no avail. Does anyone have any idea how to find that culprit? Are you sure it's not pre

Re: [CentOS] mail issue help and need good mail server

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Thank you for your helping but why user keeps downloading mails what he downloaded before? I check the mail client setting and it works fine If it is not server control, any hints about this problem Here's one example: me. When I'm not at home, I read my email vi

Re: [CentOS] Desperately need help with multi-core NIC performance

Pete Kay wrote: Hi, I am running a VOIP application on Centos 5.3. It is a 16 core box with 12 G of mem and all what it does is passing packets. What happens is that at around 2K channels running g711 ( 64k) codec, all eth0 is used up and no more traffic can go through. So that's about 128

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Detection

Dan Burkland wrote: Hello all, I have been exploring the various intrusion detection systems available for the Linux platform and was wondering what ones you all would recommend? I have used AIDE before and while it is extremely easy to setup, it does not support the ability to send alerts as

Re: [CentOS] Burning data cd in CentOS?

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 5:32 AM, MHR wrote: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:38 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: I need to burn data cd on my CentOS and open the pdf file on my MS Windows client . My cd drive is at /dev/cdrom that is mounted as /mnt/cdrom . To this end ,

Re: [CentOS] centralised user authentication

Mathieu Baudier wrote: Apart from ipa are there any other good tools out there for centralised user auth? I am currently testing LDAP (openldap) combined with nss_ldap, configured with authconfig. It works and the nice thing is that you can have consistent authentication at

Re: [CentOS] aide updated packages

ceejay cervantes wrote: Any news on the latest aide package? Current version of aide on CentOS 5 is aide-0.13.1-4.el5. This version of aide produces the following message on /var/log/messages "aide: Libgcrypt warning: missing initialization - please fix the appl

Re: [CentOS] Yum/WGET/HTTP sourceforge etc.

On Apr 11, 2010, at 6:57 PM, tony.chamberl...@lemko.com wrote: > > I am having a problem with 5.4 that I did not have with 4.5. The > problem happens only sometimes but in specific > instances. Basically a summary of the problem is that certain > network transactions timeout. The specfic inst

Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT: which hardware for CentOS file server (Samba, 2 To storage, 50 users)?

Gé Weijers wrote: 50 simultaneous users will require more than a bargain desktop PC. I would go for low-end server hardware, which will get you ECC memory and more SATA ports. The cost is probably not significantly more than a _good_ quality desktop system. You may want to allow for

Re: [CentOS] burning an image

david walcroft wrote: On 04/15/2010 11:10 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: On 15/04/10 09:58, david walcroft wrote: I downloaded CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso but I haven't used Centos before and I've haven't used a -bin-DVD.iso before,every attempt so far to burn one has produced coasters,wha

Re: [CentOS] Debugging slow apache server?

On Apr 20, 2010, at 8:28 AM, Roland RoLaNd wrote: hello, i'm using an apache server to host 8 virtual hosts. even though this server is local.. 7 out of these 8 virtual hosts open extremly slow.. it takes around 10 seconds to open a page.. though the 8th (which is a completely differ

Re: [CentOS] X Servers xorg.conf file changing.

Don Krause wrote: On Apr 21, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Don Krause wrote: On Apr 21, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Ned Slider wrote: Don Krause wrote: Twice now over the past year, I've had something edit the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file without user intervention.

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading to 2.6.32

maillis...@gmail.com wrote: I want to upgrade a 5.4 box with the 2.618 kernel to a shiny new 2.6.32 kernel. Anyone done it? Is it possible? Are there gotcha's to watch out for? So why not try RHEL v6 beta? Any advice is appreciated. A link to a decent howto would be awesome. -

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >