On 04/07/2011 03:58 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 08:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> Please try to maintain some semblance of professionalism when you post
>> to this list.
> This coming from someone who frequently tells people to "SHUT UP" and go
> away and use something else. I guess th
On 04/07/2011 06:49 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>>> These people are priceless and don't deserve to be
>>> submitted to the harshness we have been witnessing lately.
>
> And everyone else is worthless and deserve the rudeness handed out by the
> devs?
> Why don't you make comment on that or is that p
On 04/07/2011 07:02 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 08:11 AM, Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
>> On 04/07/2011 03:58 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
>>> On 04/07/2011 08:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please try to maintain some semblance of professionalism wh
On 04/08/2011 01:12 AM, Tamada Wilder wrote:
> Ian Murray hits the point.
> now i followed this list for some mounth and im gonna change also my
> last boxes to SL.
> I've never seen so strange and useless comments from devs in any other
> mailinglist before.
> The information politic is just horri
On 04/08/2011 01:34 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:31:10AM +0300, Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
>> +1
> For the love of whatever $deity you believe in...
>
> If you're going to leave then go ahead and leave. But could
> you do so qui
On 04/11/2011 11:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:37:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report back
what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
On 04/12/2011 02:01 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 01:21 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>> Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/11/2011 12:20 PM:
>> ...
>>> No, re-read what I said. Ownership in the distro is quite a different
>>> ballgame from userend support.
>> Yes, but it seems to be rather closely
On 04/12/2011 02:37 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 12:31 PM, Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
>> I think you are avoiding the real issue here, again and again. It's not
>> about ownership. It's not about taking ownership.
>> It's about making the process open
On 04/12/2011 02:37 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 12:31 PM, Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
>> I think you are avoiding the real issue here, again and again. It's not
>> about ownership. It's not about taking ownership.
>> It's about making the process open
On 04/12/2011 08:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 05:19 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
>>> Fixing the timing of release is something we get from getting the
>>> process into the right place. And not the other way around. There seems
>> NO ONE IS SAYING TO PUSH CRAP OUT THE DOOR JUST FOR THE SA
On 04/13/2011 07:55 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/12/2011 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
There is no compelling reason
to tamper with a system that works that I have seen so far.
Is there any amount of elapsed time that will convince you otherwise?
I'l
Hello,
Is there any maximum number of IP aliases or IP ranges that ifup can
handle? Right now i have about 12000 IPs assigned to the server and when
trying to assign range number 47 (ifup eth0-range47), i get his error:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-post: line 21: 12733 Segmentation
fault
Hi all,
I can confirm this has happened to all my CentOS boxes in production.
Regards,
Radu
On 12/14/2010 03:15 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
Hi all,
After the latest security update for bind (which came out last night),
now there's a new message on syslog, (facility: daemon, severity:
warning)
On 05/16/2011 11:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/16/2011 3:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 05/16/11 1:18 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Yes, but whatever can't be automated here should benefit from doing the
>>> trial-and-error in parallel. And the potential improvements might come
>>> in the au
On 05/17/2011 12:15 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
>
>> The main "fear" the developers have is that somebody could steal their
>> work and come up with
>> another RHEL clone easily if they release their build sy
On 05/17/2011 12:47 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/16/11 2:41 PM, Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
>> I never said I want to do it.
> ah, so what DID you say? you want someone unspecified to do a
> better/different job for you than someone else is already doing for free ?
>
> man,
On 05/17/2011 12:51 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:41:23AM +0300, Radu Gheorghiu wrote:
On 05/17/2011 12:15 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
What a load of undiluted crap.
Please keep this for yourself.
Why when it's the truth. Does the truth hurt?
It may be the truth
t. I can assure you that the
>> current trolls will be back in their cages safely under their bridges in
>> short order.
>>
>>
>>
>> John
> Hang around in OpenBSD-misc or Full-Disclosure for a while to reset
&
18 matches
Mail list logo
